Advanced Search Results
Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … Section 120B, 121A, 122, 123, 153A, 212, 420, 468, 471 of IPC, Section 9B(1)(b) of the Explosives Act, Section 5A and 6 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … Section 120B, 121A, 122, 123, 153A, 212, 420, 468, 471 of IPC, Section 9B(1)(b) of the Explosives Act, Section 5A and 6 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Sunder Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-11-2001
Criminal
2007(3)WLN95
IPC. However, SHO Madan Dan Singh investigated the case and filed challan Under Section 9B of the Explosive Act, 1884 against respondents No.2 and 3 accused and also for the offence Under Sections 286, 337, 338 and 304A … charges against the accused on 10.1.2000 for the offences punishable Under Sections 5A and 9B of the Explosive Act and also Under Sections 286, 337, … petition by the petitioner that on 5.5.1999 when the van of respondent No. 2 Kailash Chand Jhanwar carrying explosive substance in a huge quantity being unloaded in 'Nohra' of respondent No.2, at that time due to explosion
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sita Ram Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-25-2014
Land Acquisition
by the Chief Controller of Explosives for storage of explosives under the Explosives Rules, 1983 framed under the Explosives Act, 1884.4. Under the Explosives Rules, it is mandatory to maintain open radial safety distance of 71 meters from … the license; the so-called industrial unit was not in operation. Therefore, the objections raised by the appellant under Section 5A of the Act to the preliminary notification are not tenable in law and the High Court held that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHigh Court of Karnataka, Represented by the Registrar General and Othe ...
Karnataka
Dec-17-2014
Land Acquisition
a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. OFFENCES UNDER THE EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884: "SECTION-9B. Punishment for certain offences.- (1) Whoever, in contravention of rules made under section 5 or of the conditions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Aug-16-2016
Land Acquisition
of bursting. (iii) The measurement shall be made with an approved sound level meter. C. The Department of Explosives shall ensure implementation of these standards." (emphasis added) 62. Thus, manufacturing, sale or use of fire-crackers generating noise … an electric horn or other devices conforming to the requirements of IS: 1884 - 1992, specified by the Bureau of Indian Standards] for use by … Sub-Rule (4) read with the Schedule. 59. Now, we come to Rule 5A which deals with restrictions on the use of horns, sound emitting construction … other festivals. Reliance has been placed by the Petitioners on the information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Attention of the Court is invited to various statutory provisions and especially the provisions of section 234
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›