Advanced Search Results
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6
sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 persons of all the charges. … India by the absconding accused Tiger Memon and other co-conspirators.At head thirdly, for commission of the offence under Section 5 of TADA Act, on the count of unauthorisedly, within the notified area of Greater Bombay, from 03.02.1993 onwards,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Ismail Shakur Morani
Mumbai
Feb-12-1957
Criminal
Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 5 and 5(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40; Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rule 81, 81(1) and 81(2); Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rule 81(4); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 and 5
AIR1958Bom103; (1957)59BOMLR491; 1958CriLJ352; ILR1957Bom487
of Rs. 150/-or in default to suffer one month's rigorous imprisonment.23. Appeal allowed. Indian Explosives Act (IV of 1884), Section 5(3) - Explosives Rules, 1940, Rule 81--Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3, 4, 5--Whether mens rea … a contravention of condition No. 11 of the licence which was granted to the respondent under the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.12. Mr. Mistry has next contended that even if we came to the conclusion that the respondent had contravened
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLopchand Naruji Jat and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2004
Criminal
Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4 and 9B; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983; Explosive Substances Act, 1908
2004(2)ALD(Cri)903; 2004CriLJ4241; [2004(4)JCR156(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC226; 2004(7)SCALE644; (2004)7SCC566; 2005(1)LC82(SC)
submitted that articles recovered from the appellants cannot be said to be explosives and, therefore, also the appellants could not have been convicted. As there … Judge of the Gujarat High Court upholding their conviction for offence punishable under Section 9B(i)(b) of the Explosive Act 1884 (in short the 'Act'). The Trial Court sentenced each of the appellants to undergo imprisonment for one year … registered against the appellants-accused. They were charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) of the Act and Section 5 of the Terrorists & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 (in short the 'TADA'). By judgment and order dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M. Balakrishna Reddy and Others Vs. Principal Secretary to Govt., Home ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-11-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306(4), 321, 397 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 121-A, 143, 406, 494 and 498-A; Constitution of India - Article 227; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Indian Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 5(3) and 12
1999(2)ALD228; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)565; 1999(2)ALT325; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)9; 1999CriLJ3566
4, 5 and 6 of the Explosives Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 5(3)(b) and 12 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 as well as the substantive offences.2. That besides the accused who were sent up for trial two accused … of 1998. M. Venkata Lakshmi and M. Radhakrishna Reddy were facing prosecution in Crime No.33 of 1995 under Section 498-A and 406 of 1PC when a Government order being G.O. Rt. No.2087 was issued by the Home
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Pradeep Kumar Vs. the Chief Controller of Explosives, Nagpur and o ...
Allahabad
Sep-24-1975
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5, 7 and 17; Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rules 81, 84, 85, 86 and 88; Gas Cylinders Rules, 1940 - Rule 1
AIR1976All266
(1), dated the 28th September, 1938. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the Central Government is pleased to declare that any gas when compressed in any metal … expression 'explosive' as defined in the Indian Explosives Act and the Rules made thereunder would clearly be applicable.5. Section 5 of the Indian Explosives Act relates to the power of the Central Government to make Rules as to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Dec-04-2007
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 18, 19, 20A, 20A(1) and 20A(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Arms Act - Sections 25; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5 and 9B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
AIR2008SC743; 2007AIRSCW7897; 2008(1)Crimes82; 2008(2)KCCRSN104
in the court on 24.2.1994 for prosecution of the appellant under Sections 4, 5, and 9B(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884. There was no mention of any offence under TADA or under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The charge-sheet … at Jalandhar in TADA Sessions Case No. 4 of 2006 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and has been sentenced to 5 years R.I. and a fine of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4
and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJameel Ahmed and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Apr-30-2003
CriminalNarcotics
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 6, 6(1), 15, 15(1) and 15(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 286; Expolsive Substances Act - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B and 9C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 229 and 313; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15 and 15(5); Evidence Act - Sections 24 to 30
JT2003(4)SC294; RLW2003(3)SC424; 2003(4)SCALE402; (2003)9SCC673; 2003(2)LC993(SC)
Substances Act. Learned Judge also held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosives Act. Based on the said conviction, he imposed a sentence of 5 years' RI with a fine of Rs. … 3 months. Nextly, he held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosive Act, 1884 and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 500/-; in default to … held the appellants guilty of offences punishable under Section 120B IPC, Sections 3(3) and 6(1) of the TADA, Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act read with Section 120B of the IPC and Section 6 of the Explosive
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Mahadevappa Hanmantappa
Mumbai
Nov-17-1926
Criminal
(1927)29BOMLR153
punishable under Rule 188, Clause 4 or Clause 9 of those framed under Section 5 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.22. The case, in my opinion, is one of those where the effect of the statute is to make
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Ismail Shakur Morani
Mumbai
Feb-11-1957
Criminal
Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 5(3); Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rule 81; Rag Flock Act, 1911 - Sections 1(1)
AIR1958Bom147; (1957)59BOMLR485; 1958CriLJ489; ILR1957Bom480
process of manufacturing fire-works--Condition contained in licence whether contravened by accused.;The accused held a licence under the Indian Explosives Act, 1884, for manufacturing, possessing and selling fire works, and one of the conditions imposed upon him by the licence … The appeal filed by the State, therefore, fails and is dismissed.11. Appeal dismissed. Indian Explosives Act (IV of 1884), Section 5(3) - The Explosives Rules, 1940, Rule 81--Licence issued to accused under Act for manufacturing fire-works--Condition in licence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »