Advanced Search Results

Harpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 18, 19, 20A, 20A(1) and 20A(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Arms Act - Sections 25; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5 and 9B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2008SC743; 2007AIRSCW7897; 2008(1)Crimes82; 2008(2)KCCRSN104

in the court on 24.2.1994 for prosecution of the appellant under Sections 4, 5, and 9B(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884. There was no mention of any offence under TADA or under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The charge-sheet … G.P. Mathur, J.1. This Appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 against the judgment and order dated 16.3.2007 of

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance." In addition to the … sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 persons of all the charges.

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Vs. the Chief Controller of Explosives, Nagpur and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5, 7 and 17; Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rules 81, 84, 85, 86 and 88; Gas Cylinders Rules, 1940 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1976All266

(1), dated the 28th September, 1938. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the Central Government is pleased to declare that any gas when compressed in any metal

Lopchand Naruji Jat and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4 and 9B; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)903; 2004CriLJ4241; [2004(4)JCR156(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC226; 2004(7)SCALE644; (2004)7SCC566; 2005(1)LC82(SC)

proceedings were illegal. It was also submitted that articles recovered from the appellants cannot be said to be explosives and, therefore, also the appellants could not have been convicted. As there was no independent evidence and only … Judge of the Gujarat High Court upholding their conviction for offence punishable under Section 9B(i)(b) of the Explosive Act 1884 (in short the 'Act'). The Trial Court sentenced each of the appellants to undergo imprisonment for one year … found to be in possession of 180 detonators. A criminal case No. 4 of 1990 was registered against the appellants-accused. They were charge-sheeted for the

Emperor Vs. Mahadevappa Hanmantappa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR153

punishable under Rule 188, Clause 4 or Clause 9 of those framed under Section 5 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.22. The case, in my opinion, is one of those where the effect of the statute is to make

M. Balakrishna Reddy and Others Vs. Principal Secretary to Govt., Home ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306(4), 321, 397 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 121-A, 143, 406, 494 and 498-A; Constitution of India - Article 227; Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Indian Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 5(3) and 12

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD228; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)565; 1999(2)ALT325; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)9; 1999CriLJ3566

4, 5 and 6 of the Explosives Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 5(3)(b) and 12 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 as well as the substantive offences.2. That besides the accused who were sent up for trial two accused … of 1998. M. Venkata Lakshmi and M. Radhakrishna Reddy were facing prosecution in Crime No.33 of 1995 under Section 498-A and 406 of 1PC when a Government order being G.O. Rt. No.2087 was issued by the Home

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to … and 2730 explosions. Property worth Rs. 2000 crores is reported to have been damaged. Almost 437600 kg. Of explosives, mostly RDX, had been inducted and 61900 sophisticated weapons had been smuggled into India. It is estimated that

The State Vs. Ismail Shakur Morani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 5 and 5(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40; Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rule 81, 81(1) and 81(2); Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rule 81(4); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1958Bom103; (1957)59BOMLR491; 1958CriLJ352; ILR1957Bom487

of Rs. 150/-or in default to suffer one month's rigorous imprisonment.23. Appeal allowed. Indian Explosives Act (IV of 1884), Section 5(3) - Explosives Rules, 1940, Rule 81--Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3, 4, 5--Whether mens rea … a contravention of condition No. 11 of the licence which was granted to the respondent under the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.12. Mr. Mistry has next contended that even if we came to the conclusion that the respondent had contravened

Jameel Ahmed and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 6, 6(1), 15, 15(1) and 15(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 286; Expolsive Substances Act - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B and 9C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 229 and 313; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15 and 15(5); Evidence Act - Sections 24 to 30

Reported in : JT2003(4)SC294; RLW2003(3)SC424; 2003(4)SCALE402; (2003)9SCC673; 2003(2)LC993(SC)

had committed an offence under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 286 of the … Substances Act. Learned Judge also held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosives Act. Based on the said conviction, he imposed a sentence of 5 years' RI with a fine of Rs. … 3 months. Nextly, he held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosive Act, 1884 and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 500/-; in default to … by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIC.II, New Delhi for offences under Sections 3(3) and 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987