Advanced Search Results

Harpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 18, 19, 20A, 20A(1) and 20A(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Arms Act - Sections 25; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5 and 9B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2008SC743; 2007AIRSCW7897; 2008(1)Crimes82; 2008(2)KCCRSN104

in the court on 24.2.1994 for prosecution of the appellant under Sections 4, 5, and 9B(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884. There was no mention of any offence under TADA or under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The charge-sheet … Court is not trying an offence under TADA it will have no jurisdiction to try any other offence. Section 18 also points out the same situation which says that where, after taking cognizance of any offence, a Designated

Sayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … 13, 18, 19 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Section 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section - 18 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 9B(1)(b) of Explosives Act and Sections 3 and

Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … 13, 18, 19 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Section 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section - 18 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 9B(1)(b) of Explosives Act and Sections 3 and

Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(2); Explosive Act, 1884; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 120, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 338; Terriorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 4, 6, 18, 19(1) and 20(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 57, 167(2), 173, 260(1), 262, 263-265 and 436 to 450; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - SectionS 3 and 25(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1994SC2623; 1995CriLJ517; 1994(2)Crimes916(SC); JT1994(4)SC255; 1994(3)SCALE105; (1994)4SCC602; [1994]Supp1SCR360; 1994(2)LC786(SC); MANU/SC/0526/1994

act or things by using (a) bombs or dynamite or (b) other explosives substances or (c) inflammable substances or (d) fire arms or (e) other … activity, contravenes any of the provisions of or any rule made under the Arms Act 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act 1952 and renders him liable to punishment for … for its trial by the regular courts under the ordinary criminal law in view of the provisions of Section 18 of TADA. It is submitted that the Designated Court should not, without proper application of mind, charge-sheet or

Emperor Vs. Mahadevappa Hanmantappa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR153

punishable under Rule 188, Clause 4 or Clause 9 of those framed under Section 5 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.22. The case, in my opinion, is one of those where the effect of the statute is to make … No. 4 in the license in form A of the rules under the Indian Explosives Act IV of 1884,(2) with doing a rash and negligent act so as to endanger human life under Section 286, Indian Penal

Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 12, 21, 21(2), 23(1) and 23(2); Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 20, 20(4), 20(7), 20(8) and 20(9); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Indian Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 5, 6, 9 and 9B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4 and 25; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 18 and 23; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 167, 167(2), 437 and 439

Reported in : AIR2009SC2772; 2009CriLJ3952; JT2009(8)SC250; 2009(8)SCALE642; (2009)7SCC480:2009AIRSCW4202

panchanama went on from 9.5.2006 to 10.5.200610.5.2006 LAC 3/06 under Section 120B of IPC r.w.Section 4, 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908r.w. 5, 6, 9, 9B of. Indian Explosive Act,1884 r.w. 3, 4, 25 of Indian Arms … extended by another 90 days and the investigation is required to be completed in a maximum period of 180 days, there is no provision for granting extension after completion of 90 days in piecemeal in as much

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences under TADA, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884. By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons and acquitted 23 persons of all … for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation … (A-67), he made a disclosure under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and led Mr. Anil Prabhakar Mahabole (PW-506), Police Officer and pancha Suresh

Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

or a terrorist organisation or a terrorist gang contravenes] any provision of, or any rule made under the Explosives Act, 1884 (4 of 1884) or the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (6 of 1908) or the inflammable Substances Act, 1952 … Acts 1908 - Section 4, Section 5 - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 10, Section 13, Section 18, Section 20, Section 21, Section 23 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 65-B - Appeal against conviction Trial

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

Act provides for enhanced penalties for offences resulting from contravention of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of … shall have precedence over the trial of the same accused regarding any other case triable by another court. Section 18 of the Act authorizes the Designated Court to transfer a case, which it is not competent to try,

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

2000 crores is reported to have been damaged. Almost 437600 kg. Of explosives, mostly RDX, had been inducted and 61900 sophisticated weapons had been smuggled … or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to … of a Civil Court required for making a full and fair enquiry into the matter before, it.' Under Section 18, provision in respect of terrorist organizations has been made. These are listed in the Schedule. The Central Government