Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: explosives act 1884 section 16 · Page 1 of about 167 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 2012

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2012

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

terrorist act punishable under Section 16 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as well as offences under the Explosives Act, 1884, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Arms Act, 1959.265. Nothing will please Mr. Raju Ramachandran, senior counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1987

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-20-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

Act provides for enhanced penalties for offences resulting from contravention of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of … Act, 1985: The Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. 1987: Section 7 Section 8. Section 9(2) Section 13 Section 16 Section 17(2) Section 17(4) Section 17(5) = Section 9 = Section 10 = Section 11(2) = Section 16

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1A), (1B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention … a nefarious activity.” We are in agreement with the said conclusion. Recoveries from Al-Hussaini building after the blasts 16) The abandoned Maruti car bearing number MFC 197.which was recovered from outside the gate of Siemens factory at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 14 2022

Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … (SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SPP-I A/W SRI VIJAY KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED1004.2017 AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED1204.2017 PASSED BY THE … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, for the offences punishable under Sections 16(1)(b), 17 and 18 respectively, of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2022

Sayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … (SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SPP-I A/W SRI VIJAY KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED1004.2017 AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED1204.2017 PASSED BY THE … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, for the offences punishable under Sections 16(1)(b), 17 and 18 respectively, of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences under TADA, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884. By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons and acquitted 23 persons of all … for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation … at Century Bazaar at 14:45 hrs wherein 88 persons were killed and 160 persons were injured; Fifthly, Bashir Ahmed Usman Gani Khairulla (A-13), Zakir Hussain

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2009

Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 12, 21, 21(2), 23(1) and 23(2); Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 20, 20(4), 20(7), 20(8) and 20(9); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Indian Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 5, 6, 9 and 9B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4 and 25; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 18 and 23; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 167, 167(2), 437 and 439

Reported in : AIR2009SC2772; 2009CriLJ3952; JT2009(8)SC250; 2009(8)SCALE642; (2009)7SCC480:2009AIRSCW4202

panchanama went on from 9.5.2006 to 10.5.200610.5.2006 LAC 3/06 under Section 120B of IPC r.w.Section 4, 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908r.w. 5, 6, 9, 9B of. Indian Explosive Act,1884 r.w. 3, 4, 25 of Indian Arms … 2 of the Code and 'Cognizable Case' as defined in that clause shall be construed accordingly. (2) Section 167 of the Code shall apply in relation to a case involving an offence punishable under this Act subject

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1991

Chaman Lal JaIn and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-04-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 6, 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(2), 344 and 482; Terrorists Act - Sections 20(4); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 16; Constitution of India - Article - 21, 32, 226 and 227

Reported in : 1992CriLJ955; 1992(1)WLC76; 1991(2)WLN212; 1991(2)WLN259

was registered for offences under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 9(b) of Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 6 of Territorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'TADA'). Meethalal and … Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India when especially there is a clear provision under Section 16 of the said Act (Section 19 of the new Act) ousting the jurisdiction of the High Court in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2003

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8 and 16; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1); Petroleum Act, 1934; Explosives Act, 1884; Weights and measures Act, 1976; Payment of Wages Act; Shops and Establishment Act; Factories Act; Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2881; 2003(5)ALD26(SC); 2003(2)ARBLR666(SC); 2003(4)AWC2674(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2433; (2003)4CompLJ311(SC); 2003(3)CTC438; [2003(4)JCR140(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC1; (2003)135

the Dealership of the Corporation.(b) The Dealer shall observe and comply with the provisions of Petroleum Act, 1934, Explosives Act, 1884, Weights & Measures Act, 1976, etc., and all rules and regulations made thereunder.(c) The Dealer shall faithfully observe … raised in the suit because such an exercise could only be undertaken by the arbitrator in view of Section 16 of the Act. In support of this contention of his, learned counsel placed strong reliance on a Constitution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2014

High Court of Karnataka, Represented by the Registrar General and Othe ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. OFFENCES UNDER THE EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884: "SECTION-9B. Punishment for certain offences.- (1) Whoever, in contravention of rules made under section 5 or of the conditions … India and Islam would be the only religion followed in India. 8. Siddique Deendar Channabasaveshwara and his followers, 16 in number, were prosecuted for endangering public peace by preaching new religion and thereby promoting hatred and enemity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial