Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: explosives act 1884 section 14 · Page 1 of about 172 results (0.041 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 2012

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2012

Subject : Education

see as to how the term 'company' has been defined in similar Central penal Statutes. 43. In the "Explosives Act, 1884 Section 9-C deals with 'offences by companies', which reads as follows: "9-C. Offences by companies. - (1) Whenever an … Order 1. Whether a Public Charitable Trust is a juristic person and a company in terms of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is the issue involved in these petitions. 2. The petitioners are the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1988

P.A. Kannan Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-31-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5, 14(2) and 15; Explosive Rules, 1983 - Rule 135(l); Karnataka Police Act, 1964 - Sections S. 31(l); Constitution of India - Articles 19(l) and 226

Reported in : AIR1989Kant285; 1988(3)KarLJ95

are being disposed of by this common order.4. The possession and sale of explosives is regulated by the Explosives Act, 1884 ('the Act' for short) and the Explosives Rules 1983, framed under the Act. The expression 'explosive' is defined … the notification issued by the Central Government under sub-sec. (2) of S. 14 of the Act. Section 14(2) reads:'14. SAVING & POWER TO EXEMPT. xxx … under the Act. The expression 'explosive' is defined under S. 4(d) of the Act and it includes fire-works. Section 5 of the Act empowers the Central Government to frame rules, inter alia, prescribing the authority by which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2000

Dr. S.P. Thirumala Rao Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-29-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 6-E(3); Explosives Rules, 1983

Reported in : ILR2001KAR541; 2001(4)KarLJ5

that is being carried on by these companies is limited to regulating the business through the provisions of Explosives Act, 1884 ('the Act' for short) and Explosives Rules, 1983 ('the Rules' for short). The Act and the Rules provide … business in explosives and any violation thereof either by these companies or their agents can be visited under Section 6-E of the Act with punishment which includes revocation of the licence. The petitioner ought to have brought … scheme cannot also be faulted on the ground that it violates Article 14 of the Constitution.10. Thus, both in law and on facts, there is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 21 2002

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2002

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

2000 crores is reported to have been damaged. Almost 437600 kg. Of explosives, mostly RDX, had been inducted and 61900 sophisticated weapons had been smuggled … or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to … the designated authority for the purpose of 'making a full and fair enquiry into the matter before it.' Section 14 makes it obligatory for the named authority to furnish the information sought by an investigating officer.7. Section 15

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1982

Sheonandan Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(8), 25, 209(1), 209(2), 253(1), 253(2), 302, 306(4), 321, 417, 435, 436 and 439; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 109, 120B, 121A, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 417, 420, 463, 464, 466, 471; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1983SC1125; AIR1983SC194; 1983(0)BLJR645; 1983CriLJ348; 1984(1)Crimes147(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1241; 1983(2)SCALE126; (1983)1SCC438; (1983)4SCC104; [1983]2SCR61

4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 5(3)(b) and 12 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (as in George Fernande's case) less henious than offences under Sections 420/466/471/109/120B of the Penal Code and 5(1) … challenging the withdrawal from the prosecution of Respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in a criminal case under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1073.2. After obtaining the requisite sanction from the Governor on 19th February, … the said order was dismissed in limine by the High Court on 14th September, 1981. It is this withdrawal from the prosecution permitted by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2010

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. the Committee for Protection of Demo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 1(1), 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1) and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; ;Explosives Act, 1884 - Section 9B; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 201, 302, 364, 436 and 448; ;Constitution of India - Articles 1, 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 31C, 32, 142, 144, 226, 226(1), 245 to 255 and 256 to 261

Reported in : 2010(2)KCCR785,RLW2010(1)SC822,2010(2)SCALE467,2010(2)LC1047(SC):(2010)3SCC571

(for short 'the IPC') read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 9(B) of the Explosives Act, 1884 was registered only on 5th January, 2001. On 8th January, 2001, Director General of Police, West Bengal directed … on 4th January, 2001 itself but the First Information Report ('the FIR' for short) for offences under Sections 148/149/448/436/364/302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1A), (1B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention … bag was opened and was found to contain 7 rifles. The second bag was containing 4 bombs and 14 magazines; and (ii) PW-46 also noticed two white bags on the front row of the Van and a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences under TADA, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884. By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons and acquitted 23 persons of all … for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation … Ahmed Shaikh (A-12) planted bomb and caused explosion at Katha Bazaar at 14:15 hrs. wherein 4 persons were killed and 21 persons were injured; Thirdly,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1926

Emperor Vs. Mahadevappa Hanmantappa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR153

punishable under Rule 188, Clause 4 or Clause 9 of those framed under Section 5 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884.22. The case, in my opinion, is one of those where the effect of the statute is to make … his servant in using it to excess : The King v. Dixon.(1) There Lord Ellenborough C.J. said (p. 14) :-He who deals in a perilous article must be wary how he deals, otherwise, if he observe not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1987

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-20-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

Act provides for enhanced penalties for offences resulting from contravention of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of … every Designated Court or a Special Public Prosecutors for any case or class or group of cases. 27. Section 14 of the Act deals with the procedure and powers of the Designated Courts. Section 15 of the Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial