Advanced Search Results

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

Act provides for enhanced penalties for offences resulting from contravention of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of … Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985: The Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. 1987: Section 7 Section 8. Section 9(2) Section 13 Section 16 Section 17(2) Section 17(4) Section 17(5) = Section 9 = Section 10 = Section 11(2) =

Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 12, 21, 21(2), 23(1) and 23(2); Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 20, 20(4), 20(7), 20(8) and 20(9); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Indian Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 5, 6, 9 and 9B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4 and 25; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 18 and 23; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 167, 167(2), 437 and 439

Reported in : AIR2009SC2772; 2009CriLJ3952; JT2009(8)SC250; 2009(8)SCALE642; (2009)7SCC480:2009AIRSCW4202

panchanama went on from 9.5.2006 to 10.5.200610.5.2006 LAC 3/06 under Section 120B of IPC r.w.Section 4, 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908r.w. 5, 6, 9, 9B of. Indian Explosive Act,1884 r.w. 3, 4, 25 of Indian Arms … Special Court.5. The sequence of events in the instant appeals is as under:(a) The appellants were arrested on 13.5.2006 on the charges punishable under the MCOC Act, 1999. (b) The period of initial 90 days to complete

S.M. Mazhar and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Magistrate for taking cognizance in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be sent down immediately. Explosives Act, 1884, Section 9-B - Explosive Rules, 1983, Rule 5--Explosive substances Act, 1908, Sections 5 and 7--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section … on the basis of the allegation made in the FIR as well as the charge sheet filed thereto. 13. On close scrutiny of the relevant provisions of the aforesaid two Acts, namely, the Explosive Act, 1884 as

Francis Xavier Salemao S/O David Salemao Vs. State Through the Public ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5, 7; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 25 and 35; Explosive Substances Act, 1905 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983

Reported in : 2007BomCR(Cri)847

J.1. This appeal is by the accused who has been convicted and sentenced under Section 9B(1)(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884(Act, for short) for having been found in possession of 9 non electrical detonators and 31 electrical detonators(item Nos. … 1908 in addition to Section 9B(1)(a) and (b) of the Explosive Act, 1884, with the allegation that at 13.00 hours on 1412001, PSI Banudas Dessai/PW14 who at the relevant time was attached to Vasco Police Station had

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

see as to how the term 'company' has been defined in similar Central penal Statutes. 43. In the "Explosives Act, 1884 Section 9-C deals with 'offences by companies', which reads as follows: "9-C. Offences by companies. - (1) Whenever an … records, quash the private complaints in S.T.C.No.68 of 2012 and S.T.C.No.71 of 2012 respectively for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Hosur.) Common

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

2000 crores is reported to have been damaged. Almost 437600 kg. Of explosives, mostly RDX, had been inducted and 61900 sophisticated weapons had been smuggled … or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to … shall not debar the award of any other punishment. Section 12 deals with the claims of third parties. Section 13 confers the powers of a Civil Court on the designated authority for the purpose of 'making a full

Vernon Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

earlier implicated in 19 cases for alleged crimes under the 1967 Act, the Arms Act 1959, and the Explosives Act 1884. But it has been submitted before us on his behalf that he has been acquitted in 17 out … association, continues to be a member thereof, would attract penalty under Section 10 of the 1967 Act.9. Barring Section 13, all the offences with which the appellants have been charged with under the 1967 Act fall within Chapters

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1A), (1B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention … owner of the said Van, at Al-Hussaini building. Recovery of abandoned Maruti Van not MFC 197.near Siemens Factory 13) It is relevant to note that the Maruti Van bearing number MFC 197.recovered from outside the gate of

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences under TADA, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884. By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons and acquitted 23 persons of all … for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation … throughout the world. In a span of about two hours i.e., between 13:33 to 15:40 hours, a series of 12 bomb explosions took place one

Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

CONVICTED THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS161)(b),17,18 OF UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT AND SECTIONS5b),9B(1)(b) OF EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884, AND SECTIONS420468,471 AND120B) R/W149OF IPC AND SECTION251AA) R/W3OF ARMS ACT AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE … further case of the prosecution that, accused Nos.1 to 6, 8 to 13 were the members of Indian Muzahiddin Organization and accused No.7 is the … (SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SPP-I A/W SRI VIJAY KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED1004.2017 AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED1204.2017 PASSED BY THE