Advanced Search Results
The State of U.P. Vs. Ram Pal
Allahabad
Apr-17-1964
Criminal
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Article 258(1)
AIR1965All15; 1965CriLJ1
Section 6 of the Explosives Act. Criminal - delegation of function to State Government - Section 7 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Article 258(1) of Constitution of India - President may entrust the functions relating to executive power to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.
Delhi
Oct-29-2003
Criminal
Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307
2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669
them guilty of having committed the offence under Section 4(b) of POTA.441. Sections 3 and 4 of The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 reads as under :-'3. Punishment for causing explosion likely to endanger life or property.Any person who unlawfully and … the accused did not comprehend the charge or were misled, or that miscarriage of justice has been committed. ;Section 7--Sanction--Testimony of witness--Testimony of witness went unchallenged in respect of the deposition made by him as to what material
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Sunder Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-11-2001
Criminal
2007(3)WLN95
2 and 3 accused can be added or altered or not? Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Explosive Substances Act, 1908--Sections 3 & 5--Explosive Act, 1884--Section 9B--Locus stand--A third party like the petitioner has no locus to maintain … the present petitioner has filed this petition Under Section 482 Cr. P.C. and challenged the impugned order dated 7.1.2000 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahpura of District Bhilwara in Criminal Original Case No. 219/1999
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chaitanya Prakash Vs. State
Allahabad
Oct-27-1959
Criminal
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 7
AIR1960All376; 1960CriLJ779
the applicant and fresh evidence shall be recorded. Criminal - consent of central Government - Section 7 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - no Court to proceed with trial of any person without consent of the central Government under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Mateen and Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Feb-03-2009
Criminal
2009CriLJ2376; RLW2010(1)Raj449
delay in filing the leave to appeal, to enhance their sentence of imprisonment under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, from 10 years R.I. to the imprisonment for life.4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that … as the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant Chandra Prakash about invalid sanction (Exhibit P-278) under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act is concerned, we are of the view that after perusal of Exhibit P-278
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6
Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance." In … Air PortBay-54 and Air Port Centaur Hotel. In the abovesaid incident of serialbombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured andproperties worth about Rs. 27 crores were destroyed. This was the firstever terrorist attack
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Ashad and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
May-07-2002
Criminal
The appellants of Criminal Appeal No. 158/ 96 have been convicted under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years each under both. They have also been convicted under Section … Substances Act was vitiated on the ground of absence of sanction of the Central Government in terms of Section 7 of the Act. Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act puts restriction on trial of offence except with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2013
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4
Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance." In … at Macchimar Hindu Colony, Mahim and at Bay-52, Sahar International Airport which left more than 257 persons dead, 713 injured and property worth about Rs.27 crores destroyed, and attempted to cause bomb explosions at Naigaum Cross Road
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, W. Bengal Vs. Ne ...
Kolkata
Sep-29-1961
Constitution
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Section 7; ;Constitution of India - Article 258 and 258(1)
AIR1963Cal508,1963CriLJ258
Sessions Judge, Murshidabad acquitting the respondent Nesaruddin snaikh in respect of a charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 on a preliminary point of law. The respondent was committed for trial to the Court of the Sessions … the learned Sessions Judge, a preliminary objection on a point of law was taken, that as consent under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act had been given by the State Government and not by the Central Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShingara Singh and Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-05-1970
Criminal
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 7; Constitution of India, Articles 154(1), 163, 166, 166(3), 245, 246 and 258(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(60)
1971CriLJ966
to all State Governments, with their consent, the functions of the Central Government under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (VI of 1908).' Clause (1) of Art. 258 of the Constitution provides-'Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution the President
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »