Advanced Search Results

Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 10, 11, 13, 18, 19 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Section 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section - 18 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 9B(1)(b) of Explosives Act and Sections … He also invited attention of the Court with regard to the definition of the word 'designated authority' under Section 2(e) the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, means such officer of the Central Government not below the rank of

Sayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 10, 11, 13, 18, 19 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Section 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section - 18 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 9B(1)(b) of Explosives Act and Sections … He also invited attention of the Court with regard to the definition of the word 'designated authority' under Section 2(e) the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, means such officer of the Central Government not below the rank of

Collector and Dist. Magistrate and ors. Vs. S. Sultan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 3(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR2008SC2096; JT2008(4)SC369; 2008(4)SCALE574; 2008AIRSCW2742; 2008(3)LH(SC)2248

certain acts which are punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'), as well as the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (in short 'Explosive Act') and, therefore, shows non-application of mind. 4. It was the stand of the writ … writ petitions filed for quashing the order of detention passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore, under Sections 3(1), 3(2) read with Section 2(a) and (g) of A.P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

them guilty of having committed the offence under Section 4(b) of POTA.441. Sections 3 and 4 of The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 reads as under :-'3. Punishment for causing explosion likely to endanger life or property.Any person who unlawfully and … of Section 65B computer generated print outs were admissible in evidence provided they satisfied the conditions mentioned in Sub-section (2) and Sub-section (4) merely provided on alternative mode of proof by way of certification.268. Section 3 of the

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance." In … Plaza Theatre, Juhu Centaur Hotel, Air PortBay-54 and Air Port Centaur Hotel. In the abovesaid incident of serialbombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured andproperties worth about Rs. 27 crores were destroyed. This

Perumal and Another Vs. the State of Kerala Represented by the Public ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT618; 2012(3)KLJ632

by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of section 2 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. Section 2(b) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, defines Special Category Explosive Substances Act thus: "In this Act -

Harpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 18, 19, 20A, 20A(1) and 20A(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Arms Act - Sections 25; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5 and 9B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2008SC743; 2007AIRSCW7897; 2008(1)Crimes82; 2008(2)KCCRSN104

Sessions Case No. 4 of 2006 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and has been sentenced to 5 years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-.2. The case of the

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and within my cognizance." In … in Greater Bombay which is specified as a Notified Area under Clause (f) of Sub Section (1) of Section 2 of TADA and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 5 of TADA. At headFourthly;The appellant possessed the

S.K. Shukla and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(7), 4, 50, 60 and 60(4); Gangster Act - Sections 2 and 3; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 4; State General Clause Act; Explosives Act; Explosive Substance Act, 1908 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 120B, 302, 307, 320, 397 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 321 and 406; Arms Rules, 1962; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : AIR2006SC413; 2005CriLJ148; (2006)1SCC314

of, or otherwise managed.'24. The explosive substance has also been defined in Section 2 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 which reads as under:'2. In this Act the expression 'Explosive Substance' shall be deemed to include any materials … people or any section of the people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or

In Re: Devata Lakshminarayana

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1950Mad266

when the petitioner could have been, if the case for the Government were true, prosecuted under Section 5, Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (Act VI [6] of 1908). 10. After anxious consideration, I am of opinion that the view of Horwill … by the Government for report; and three months elapsed before the District Magistrate sent in his report on 21st June 1949. The matter was referred to the Advisory Council on 4th July 1949, and no final orders