Advanced Search Results
Nallabothu Purnaiah Vs. Garre Mallikarjuna Rao (Died) by Lrs. and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-19-2002
Contract
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 73; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 16 and 20
2003(1)ALD260
in that regard. The opinion of handwriting expert is also relevant in view of Section 45 of the Evidence Act but that too is not conclusive. It has also been held that the sole evidence of a handwriting … for. In the circumstances, there shall be no orders as to costs. Contract - agreement of sale - Sections 45 and 73 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 15, 16 and 20 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVazir Begum Ammal and anr. Vs. Seth Tholaram
Chennai
Sep-15-1959
Civil
(1960)1MLJ142
X, which are admitted or proved, is a relevant fact under Section 45 of the Evidence Act. Similarly the opinion of persons who are acquainted … hearsay evidence.6. The rule of exclusion of hearsay evidence has an exception enacted in Section 6 of the Evidence Act. Section 6 states:Facts, which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to … a comparison of the disputed signature with admitted or proved signatures, is relevant under Section 47. In these sections, the Legislature expressly states that the opinions are themselves relevant facts. Under Section 73, the Court is authorised
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState (Through Cbi/New Delhi) Vs. S.J. Choudhary
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-1990
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sectiion 302; Constitution of India - Article 136; Evidence Act - Sections 45; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3 and 4
AIR1990SC1050; 1990CriLJ1112; 1990(2)Crimes198(SC); JT1990(2)SC15; (1990)2SCC481; [1990]2SCR124
on the ground that the evidence of such typewriting expert is inadmissible under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act as it does not fall within its ambit. It seems from the impugned order that several decisions were … taking his trial before the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi for the offences under Section 302 I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act in Sessions Case No. 36 of 1983. According to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gulam Ghouse and ors. Vs. Madarse Jeelania Shama-ul-uloom Education So ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-26-2007
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2
2007(4)ALD435; 2007(4)ALT432
the suit, the defendants filed I.A. No. 554 of 2006 under Sections 45 and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act requesting the Court to send the documents, covered by Exs.A-6, A-8 and A-9, to the handwriting expert for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P.S.R.T.C. Rep. by Its M.D. Vs. Chigurupalli Krishna and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-14-2008
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 59 and 60
2009(5)ALT253
disability as 100%. His deposition, therefore, clearly satisfies the requirements of Sections 45, 59 and 60 of the Evidence Act and has got to be taken for its value.13. Ex.A-5 is the salary certificate issued by the competent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singh Vs. Sonia and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-15-2007
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25(1B); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 201 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25, 26, 45 and 91; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 164(2), 164(4), 235(2), 281, 354(3), 364, 463, 463(1), 533 and 533(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 136
AIR2007SC1218; 2007CriLJ1642; JT2007(3)SC287; 2007(3)SCALE106; (2007)3SCC1; 2007AIRSCW1278; 2007)2SCC(Cri)1; (2007)2Crimes1(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)771.; MANU/SC/7109/2007
case I would hold that Paramhansa was in police custody for the purpose of Section 26 of the Evidence Act from the date of his interrogation by the Inspector on 17.2.1962 and that he continued to be in … 46], conductor Jai Singh [PW.39], Rajesh Kumar [PW.55], Jai Dev Hans, [PW 45], Rajinder Parshad [PW 43] and K.A. Khan [PW 3]. PW. 46 in … to death and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- each. A-1 and A-2 were further convicted under Sections 25(1-B)(b) and 25(1-B(a) of the Arms Act respectively and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaleemuddIn Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-20-1971
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 417; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45
ILR1971Delhi432
direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence. But the evidence is relevant and admissible under Section 45 of the Evidence Act. In the present ease, it is also not contradicted by the contrary evidence of another expert produced in … charge involving an offence alleged to have been committed by him in a foreign land. For this purpose. Sections 2 and 4 of the Indian Penal Code were pressed into service. (11) The sections read - '2.Every
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of City of Ahmedabad Vs. Gandhi Shantilal Girdha ...
Gujarat
Nov-17-1960
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 65
AIR1961Guj196; (1961)GLR304
evidence from which an opinion of the medical expert can he proved of established. Section 45 of the Evidence Act provides that when the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of science or art, opinions … conclusions of my learned Brother and concur in the order proposed by him. (i) Civil - negligence - Sections 45 and 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - passenger injured because of collision between two buses - passenger
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.Janaki Vs. S.Jayalakshmi
Chennai
Jan-09-2012
Civil
Indian Evidence Act - Sections 45, 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Orders 26, 41 Rules 1, 27 - Section 151
Department for comparison and to verify the signature. This application was filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Order 26 Rule 1 and Section 151 CPC. A counter has been filed by the revision … within ten days from the date of depositing the same by the Advocate Commissioner. Indian Evidence Act - Sections 45, --Defendant is the revision petitioner. No expert evidence was let in by the respondent/plaintiff, except summoning the above
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Through Inspector of Police, A.P. Vs. K. Narasimhachary
Supreme Court of India
Oct-07-2005
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 11, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3) and 19; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 47, 67, 74 and 76 to 78
AIR2006SC628; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)32; 2006CriLJ518; JT2005(12)SC553; (2005)8SCC364
mode not forbidden by law can be resorted to. Of course, two modes are indicated by law in Sections 45 and 47 of the Evidence Act. The former permits expert opinion to be regarded as relevant evidence and … not been questioned. It was, therefore, a public document within the meaning of Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act. PW-6 proved the signature of Shri N. Madanmohan Reddy. He identified his signature. He was not cross-examined on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »