Advanced Search Results
Ajodhya Prasad Bhargava Vs. Bhawani Shanker Bhargava and anr.
Allahabad
May-08-1956
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 21, 31, 58, 101 to 104 and 145
AIR1957All1
verdict of perjury.' 26. In the arguments before the Privy Council it appears that reference was made to Sections 17, 21 and 31, Evidence Act. But it is not clear as to whether it was urged on behalf … Firm Piara Lal Aya Ram, AIR 1945 Lah 65 (B) ruled these documents as inadmissible under Section 145, Evidence Act. The Civil Judge decreed the suit against the appellant and dismissed it as against Messrs. H. Bevis and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnali Resports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B.E. Billimorria and Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-23-2001
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33
2002(3)BomCR112
settled that a party's admission as defined in sections 17 to 20, fulfilling the requirements of section 21, Evidence Act, is substantive evidence proprio vigore. An admission, if clearly and unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJupalli Swami Reddy and anr. Vs. Jupalli Chandraiah (Died) by Lr
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-28-2007
Property
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Andhra Pradesh Evidence Act, 1977; Civil Proceduer Code - Sections 92
2007(5)ALD120
in appreciating the scope and ambit of an admission within the meaning of Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.8. Contentions of Sri Nagabhushana Rao : Sri Nagabhushana Rao, the learned Counsel representing the respondent would submit … Courts below had totally erred in appreciating the scope and ambit of an admission within the meaning of Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.8. Contentions of Sri Nagabhushana Rao : Sri Nagabhushana Rao, the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gurjant Singh Vs. Krishan Chander and Others
Rajasthan
Jan-08-2001
Election
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(17), 24(1), 52 and 53 - Order 6, Rules 2, 15 and 16 - Order 7, Rule 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 21, 76, 77 and 79; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 64, 81(3), 83(1) and 86(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 199; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 40 and 47; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961
2001(2)WLN648
facts under the same, the relevancy of the statements about the facts is to be proved only under Sections 17 to 39 of the Evidence Act and Section 21 makes admissions relevant and proveable. Therefore, unless the documents … F, G and Schedule 1-A, II, III and IV are admissible:-The provisions of Section 74 onwards of the Evidence Act deal with admissibility of public documents. Section 79 provides for presumption of genuineness of the documents filed as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChristine Hoden (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N.D. Gadag and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-16-1992
Excise
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1987 - Sections 2; Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Article 226
1993(2)BomCR169
to costs. Excise - refund - Section 11B of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - petitioner paid excise … us that sanitary pads manufactured by their industrial units fall very much within the definition of drugs in section 3(b) under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and in the absence of any provision in the Excise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-2003
Election
Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 36(2), 116A and 146; Constitution of India - Articles 164, 164(3) and 173; Evidence Act - Sections 17 to 20, 21, 35, 58, 103 and 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rules 3 and 5 - Order 29, Rule 13
AIR2004SC230; 2004(1)BLJR129; JT2003(Suppl2)SC575; 2003(8)SCALE659; (2003)8SCC673
settled that a party's admission as defined in Sections 17 to 20, fulfilling the requirements of Section 21. Evidence Act, is substantive evidence proprio vigore. An admission, if clearly and unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandurang Jivajirao Manglekar S/O. Jivajirao Manglekar (Since Deceased ...
Karnataka
Aug-02-2007
Property
Land Reforms Act; Karnataka Land Revenue Act - Sections 34, 83, 95 and 133; Evidence Act - Sections 17 to 20 and 21; Karnataka Land Reforms Rules - Rule 17
ILR2007(3)KAR3602; 2008(1)KarLJ366; 2007(6)AIRKarR147
settled that a party's admission as defined in Sections 17 to 20 fulfilling the requirements of Section 21. Evidence Act, is substantive evidence proprio vigore. An admission, if clearly and unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Venkatesh S/O K. Swamy Rao Vs. N.G. Lakshminarayana S/O N. Govind ...
Karnataka
Apr-04-2007
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47, 91 and 92 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 21, Rules 97 to 104 - Order 23, Rule 3 and 3B - Order 43, Rule 1A; Evidence Act - Sections 17; Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Sections 48A and 79A
ILR2007KAR2894; 2008(2)KarLJ342; 2007(3)KCCR1881; 2007(5)AIRKarR292; AIR2007NOC2282
the second defendant is the manager of the family his actions bind the family.18. Section 17 of the Evidence Act defines what an admission is. It deals with admissions which are both oral or written, In so far … suit is relating to the execution of the decree passed in RSA.707/72 hence the suit is shared under Section 47 and Order 21 Rule 97 to 104?2. Whether the defendant No. 1 proves that the decree in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasant Singh Vs. Janki Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-02-1966
FamilyProperty
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10
AIR1967SC341; 1967(15)BLJR27; [1967]1SCR1
by him in a prior suit is an admission within the meaning of s. 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and may be proved against him in other litigations. The High Court also relied on the English … but also against a different opponent. Moreover, we are not concerned with the technicalities of the English law. Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 makes no distinction between an admission made by a party in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Singh and anr. Vs. Bhagirathi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-26-1965
FamilyProperty
Evidence Act - Sections 17, 21 and 145
AIR1966SC405; [1966]1SCR606
they are to be used against the person making them. Admissions are substantive evidence by themselves, in view Sections 17 and 21 of the Indian Evidence Act. Though they are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted. We … when those persons had not been confronted with those statements in accordance with S. 145 of the Indian Evidence Act. 22. Admissions have to be clear if they are to be used against the person making them. Admissions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »