Advanced Search Results
The State of U.P. Vs. Raj NaraIn and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-24-1975
Media and CommunicationCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 - 131 and 162
AIR1975SC865; (1975)4SCC428; [1975]3SCR333
holding that no privilege can be claimed by the Government of Uttar Pradesh under Section 123 of the Evidence Act in respect of what is described for the sake of brevity to be the Blue Book summoned from … of State. The Court has to determine the character and class of documents. Second, the harmonious construction of Sections 123 and 162 shows there is a power conferred on the Court under Section 162 to hold a preliminary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnant Somappa Pattar Vs. Kalappa Devendrappa Yarakad
Karnataka
Oct-31-1984
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 123; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 90
ILR1985KAR1432
deed shows that the original deed had been executed more than 30 years earlier, Section 90 of the Evidence Act would not be attracted to the photostat copy of the deed, in the absence of the original deed … stated that another attesting witness also had attested the gift deed.10. Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act specifically reads as follows :'For the … due execution of the original has been established. - KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 [K.A. No. 30/2005] Sections 4 & 15: [D.V.Shylendra Kumar,J] Scheme of the Act Held, Under the Act, persons having transaction in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhalchandra Dattatraya Bubane Vs. Chanbasappa Mallappa Warad
Mumbai
Nov-07-1938
Limitation
AIR1939Bom237; (1939)41BOMLR391
difficult to answer. The relevant provisions of the Indian Evidence Act bearing on the point are contained in Sections 123, 124 and 162. The last section deals with the production of documents in answer to summons, and it … record and claimed privilege and asked the Court to decide the question Under Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act. The trial Court does not, however, appear to have paid any heed to this letter and the statement
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rambhotla Ramanna by Power of Attorney Holder, Vs. Government of Andhr ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-26-1969
Constitution
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1971AP196
Departmental heads or the Ministers relating to a claiming privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act on the ground that disclosure of the contents of those documents would be injurious to public interest.3. The … any affairs of the State the claim must be negatived and the document must be received in evidence, Sections 123,124 and 124 have to be read together while deciding the question of privilege relating to evidence of unpublished
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj NaraIn Vs. Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-20-1974
CivilEvidence
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 162
AIR1974All324
hereinafter be called as the 'blue book'.2. According to the petitioner, firstly, privilege under Section 123 of the Evidence Act could not be claimed orally. Secondly, Sri Saxena did not claim privilege. The third contention of the petitioner's … this case the third view was accepted, and it was held as below:'Thus our conclusion is that reading Sections 123 and 162 together the Court cannot hold an enquiry into the possible injury to public interest which may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Punjab, Through Its Chief Secretary Vs. Madan Lal Gupta a ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-25-1990
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123
(1990)98PLR475
not give permission to anbody to give evidence derived therefrom as required under section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act. Disagreeing with the opinion expressed by the Secretary, Punjab Government, Senior Sub Judge, directing the relevant records to … v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 493, in the majority judgment it was observed as under :--'Reading Sections 123 and 162 together the Court cannot hold an enquiry into the possible injury to public interest which may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTilka and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Jun-20-1958
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 and 162; Police Act, 1861 - Sections 7
AIR1959All543; 1959CriLJ1035
in a sealed cover to the Magistrate and claimed privilege under Sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act The Magistrate conceded the claim of privilege and decided that the applicants were not entitled to have those
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahabirji Birajman Mandir Vs. Prem NaraIn Shukla and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-28-1964
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162 and 172; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124
AIR1965All494; 1965CriLJ452
that the subject-matter of police diaries would ordinarily be privileged under the provisions ot Section 124 of the Evidence Act and certain particulars may also be privileged under the provisions of Ss. 123 and 125 of the Evidence … statements of witnesses or other allied matters contained therein.14. The same inference can be drawn on consideration of Sections 123 and 124 ot the Evidence Act. Section 123 provides that 'no one shall be permitted to give any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. R.S. Saini Vs. Bureau of Indian Standards
Delhi
May-28-2004
Service
Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1)(i), 3(1)(iii) and 11; Evidence Act - Sections 123 and 124
112(2004)DLT164; 2004(75)DRJ430; 2004(3)SLJ507(Delhi)
offending documents, the respondent did not raise any objection either invoking Section 123 or Section 124 of the Evidence Act. Respondent did not call upon this court to remove the said documents. No privilege whatsoever or confidentiality was … No costs. Service - document - Sections 3 and 11 of Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and Sections 123 and 124 of Evidence Act - whether document procured by improper or illegal means bar its admissibility -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo Vs. Prabhakar Kashinath Kunte and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-11-1995
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 98, 99, 100, 123(3) and 123(3A); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(2) and 25 to 30; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 153A
AIR1996SC1113; JT1995(8)SC609; 1995(7)SCALE1; (1996)1SCC130; [1995]Supp6SCR371
of Section 123 of the Act and, therefore, his election is void.3. After the election petitioner closed his evidence, the returned candidate Dr. Prabhoo examined only himself in rebuttal. After close of the evidence of the parties … the High Court has rightly found the appellant guilty of the corrupt practices defined by the provisions of Sections 123(2), 123(3) and 123(3A) of the Act by making the various speeches closely examined by us also. (Para
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »