Advanced Search Results

Harikumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4 and 8A; Evidence Act, 1871 - Sections 113A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3) and 21

Reported in : I(1994)DMC356; ILR1993KAR3035; 1994(3)KarLJ335

Penal Code and the necessary consequential amendments in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 have also been proposed. 3. The Bill seeks to achieve the aforesaid objects.' 4. It is true … in certain cases.- Where any person is prosecuted for taking or abetting the taking of any dowry under Section 3, or the demanding of dowry under Section 4, the burden of proving that he had not committed an

B.N. Munibasappa Vs. Gurusiddaraja Desikendra Swamigal and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 30 - Order 5, Rule 19 - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13 - Order 11, Rules 9 to 20 - Order 18, Rule 4 - Order 19, Rules 1, 2 and 3 - Order 21, Rules 58, 90, 97 and 100 - Order 32 - Rule 3 - Order 33, Rule 2 - Order 38, Rules 1 and 5; Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Act, 1951 - Sections 8; Evidence Act - Sections 1 and 3; Indian Succession Act

Reported in : AIR1959Kant139; AIR1959Mys139

apply to affidavits presented to any Court or Officer. That that is the position is also clear from Section 3 of the Evidence Act which defines evidence as meaning: '(1) all statements which the Court permits or requires … the Code of Civil Procedure, That, is also the effect of the provisions of Section 1 of the Evidence Act according to which that Act does not apply to affidavits presented to any Court or Officer. That that

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 21, 21(1), 25, 25(1A), 25(1B), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 29(1), 35, 39 and 44; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 15, 18, 18(3), 29 and 29(1); Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2) to 21(6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 30; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 15 and 15(2); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15 and 15(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 313 and 357; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52A, 109, 120B, 201, 212, 302, 307, 324, 326, 411, 414 and 424; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Rules, 1999 - Rules 3, 3(6) and

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

to police officer to be taken into consideration (1) Notwithstanding anything in the Code or in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (I of 1872), but subject to the provisions of this section, a confession made by a person … with Accused No. 3 a rexin bag containing two 9 mm pistols and AK-56 rifle in contravention of Section 3 & 7 of the Arms Act. 22. Abdul Kadar Abdul Gafoor Rizvi (Accused No. 3) was charged under

The State of M.P. Vs. Ramkripal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 366; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 27

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT443; 2004(3)MPLJ528

(Ex. P-9) from his house in consequence of the information given by him under Section 27 of the Evidence Act as per memorandum (Ex. P-8) on the date of incident itself.4. The accused pleaded not guilty.5. The Trial … S.P. Khare, J.1. This is a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the sentence of death imposed upon accused Ramkripal

Sahdeo Ram and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Property. (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

dogmatic opinion of such a person, even if such opinion is assumed to be admissible under Section 45, Evidence Act. 'Relying upon the aforesaid decisions it was submitted that there is nothing in the evidence of PW 6 … Anil Kumar Sinha, J.1. The revision application has been directed against the order dated 3rd June, 1999 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar in Criminal Appeals Nos. 20 of 1995 and 21

Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 437(1) and 439; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 10, 30 and 32(1)

Reported in : AIR2005SC716; 99(2005)CLT644(SC); 2005CriLJ883; 2005(1)CTC233; 116(2005)DLT354(SC); (2005)2GLR1133; 2005(1)JKJ9[SC]; JT2005(1)SC361; 2005(1)KLT471(SC); 2005(I)OLR(SC)325; (

evidence of a very weak type and it does not come within the definition of evidence contained in Section 3 as it is not required to be given on oath, nor in the presence of the accused and … for getting rid of Sankararaman. 10. Shri Nariman has submitted that in view of Section 30 of the Evidence Act confession of a co-accused is a very weak type of evidence which can at best be taken into

Narender Mann Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25, 29, 54 and 59; Evidence Act - Sections 26 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CrCP) - Sections 439, 439(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 3, 34, 120B, 201, 302, 323, 341 and 506

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT387

no likelihood of his fleeing from the hands of justice. Placing reliance on Section 26 of the Indian Evidence Act the counsel submitted that the confession made by the petitioner while in custody of the police officer cannot … petitioner as well as hired killer is concerned the same is beyond any shadow of doubt and even Section 3 of the IPC has been invoked against them. The recovery of weapon of offence at the instance of

Uklya S/O Fakriya and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 24, 27 and 114

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR431

the prosecution he also made confessional statement on 1-9-1982 of the nature contemplated by section 27 of the Evidence Act, expressing his readiness to point out the place where he had concealed the other watch. It is the … convicting the present appellants who were original accused Nos. 1 and 7 respectively of the offence under section 395 of the IPC and sentencing them to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of

Tilkeshwar Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 326 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 161(3), 162, 162(1) and 342; Evidence Act - Sections 32(1) and 138

Reported in : AIR1956SC238; 1956CriLJ441; (1956)IMLJ126(SC); [1955]2SCR1043

Criminal Procedure. But the learned Judges thought that it would be admissible under section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, and the correctness of this view is disputed by the appellants. But even if Exhibit P-7 is inadmissible … Venkatarama Ayyar, J. 1. The appellants were charged before the Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of one Balbhadra Narain Singh. They

Green View Tea and Industries Vs. Collector, Golaghat, Assam and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 17(3)(A) and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2004SC1738; 2004(2)AWC1723(SC); 98(2004)CLT157(SC); [2004(2)JCR124(SC)]; JT2004(2)SC556; 2004(2)SCALE547; (2004)4SCC122

brushed aside on the ground that it did not amount to evidence under Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Having lost sight of the material on record, the High Court concluded, 'there is no material available