Advanced Search Results

State of Sikkim Vs. Aita Hang Subba @ Kaley

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Land Acquisition

PW-14 and the Medical Report, Exbt.20, the disclosure statement by the respondent/accused recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872, Exbt.6, recovery of the check shirt, M.O. II vide Exbt.8 and Forensic Report Exbt.1 read with the

State of Rajasthan Vs. Rama and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN934

1971. The first question is whether the discovery of the temple is admissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and the second is whether Jaisiya Ram is reliable From Ex P/40 dated 24-12-1971, the facts discovered are

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

made no attempt to withdraw the same, with the result that in terms of Section 58 of the Evidence Act, certain acts and documents referred to in the order dated 5.6.2002 stood proved on record without formal proof. … parcels being 2, 3 & 4 were sealed with the seal of 'YR'. The parcel Nos. 5,16,19 to 27 were sealed with the seal of 'GLM'. Parcels No. 7 to 17 were sealed with the seal of

Bibhachha Alias Bibachha Baitharu Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 46 and 302

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1553

(M.O.VI) from accused by I.O. (P.W. 34) at the instance of the accused Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act on 18-11-89 at night under Ext. 13 in presence of P.Ws. 23, 25, 30 and one Iswar Panigrahi,

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Jeet Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 302; Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR1999SC1293; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)715; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)244; (1999)2CALLT75(SC); 1999CriLJ2025; 1999(2)Crimes31(SC); JT1999(2)SC99; 1999(2)KLT9a(SC); 1999(II)OLR(SC)133; 1999(2)S

suggesting administration of poison, and smothering of the deceased, recovery of incriminating articles under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, the fact that accused and deceased were in the same room on the fateful night and that she

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 39, 161, 161(2), 162, 162(1), 162(2), 164, 173, 196, 196(1), 215, 239 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 40, 43, 71, 107, 108 to 117, 120A, 120B, 121 to 126, 130, 186, 300, 302, 307, 332, 353 and 409; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 4, 5, 5(2), 6, 20, 21, 27, 30, 32, 32(1), 32(2) to 32(5), 34, 36 to 48, 50, 50(2), 50(3), 50(4), 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(3), 52(4) and 56; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Prevention of Terrorism (2nd) Ordinance, 2001; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 5, 5(2) and 25; Constitution (69th Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2; National Capital Territories of Delhi Act, 1991 - Sections 41; Industrial Disput

Reported in : AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600; Manu/SC/0465/2005

17 -23 deals with admissions, the law as to confessions is embodied in Sections 24 -30 of the Evidence Act. Section 25 bars proof of a confession made to a police officer. Section 26 goes a step further and … or a person other than police officer. Confessions leading to discovery of fact which is dealt with under Section 27 is an exception to the rule of exclusion of confession made by an accused in the custody of

Vijayakumar Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : ILR1994KAR491

Court, particularly with regard to most material circumstance of the accused giving information under Section 27 of the Evidence Act leading to the discovery of fact. Our attention was particularly drawn to that part of the testimony recorded

Narender Mann Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25, 29, 54 and 59; Evidence Act - Sections 26 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CrCP) - Sections 439, 439(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 3, 34, 120B, 201, 302, 323, 341 and 506

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT387

cannot be used against him and therefore, the disclosure given by the petitioner has no evidentiary value. Even Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act cannot be used against the petitioner as the recovery of weapon of offence … no likelihood of his fleeing from the hands of justice. Placing reliance on Section 26 of the Indian Evidence Act the counsel submitted that the confession made by the petitioner while in custody of the police officer cannot

Faisal Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

said information furnished by A3 Crl. Appeal Nos.1178, 1179 & 1733/2009 -:46:- is clearly admissible in evidence under Section 27 of the Indian evidence Act. He produced MO8 watch through Ext.P82 property list.60. PW17 is an employee at … be brought out in order to discard or disbelieve his testimony. According to Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely

Dhruvakumar Haribhau Gujrathi Vs. Dattatraya Shankar Chikhlikar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; ;General Clause Act - Sections 27; ;Evidence Act - Sections 27 and 114

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR103; 2005(6)BomCR102; (2005)107BOMLR211

Ram. The relevant facets out of the Apex Court's decisions are as under;(a) the provisions of General Clause Act, Section 27 read with Section 114 of Evidence Act provide the presumption in favour of final act done by the