Advanced Search Results

Chandrabhagabai Ganpati Karwar Died Lrs. Ishwar Ganpati Karwar and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 112 and 114; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2 and 7

Reported in : AIR2007Bom201; 2008(1)ALLMR54; 2007(6)MhLj471

first Appellate Court committed patent error while ignoring availability of presumption of marriage under Section 112 of the Evidence Act when there was long standing association between the appellant and deceased Ganpati and both of them were residing

Smt. Ningamma and Another Vs. Chikkaiah and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 41, 115 and 151; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 112; Constitution of India - Article 21; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR2000Kant50; ILR1999KAR3389; 2000(1)KarLJ281

basis of the relevant and admissible piece of evidence. Relevancy and admissibility of evidence is controlled by the Evidence Act. Section 112 of the Evidence Act, provides that conclusive proof of legitimacy of a person born during the continuance of

Uttamrao Rajaram and ors. Vs. Sitaram Rajaram and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112, 114 and 150; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101

Reported in : AIR1963Bom165; (1962)64BOMLR752; ILR1963Bom77; 1963MhLJ23

fact.6. In respect of the first point, the learned Advocate invited our attention to Section 112 of the Evidence Act and argued that in India we are governed by a codified law of evidence and therefore the principles

K. Ramachandran Vs. Kanna Gounde and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW440; 2012(8)MLJ80

"1.Whether the Courts below have permitted the illegality in not considering the scope of Section 112 of the Evidence Act, particularly when it was not shown that the parents of the plaintiff had no access to each other

Anysaua Wd/O Govind Shende and ors. Vs. Narayan S/O Shamrao Shende and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 112; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj1122

any access to the said Champabai at any point of time. The presumption under Section 112 of the Evidence Act can only be rebutted if the party concerned could show that the parties had no access to each

P.V. Sabu Vs. Mariakutty

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR1998Ker86; I(1998)DMC198

114 of the Evidence Act as follows :'Lastly we may refer to Sections 112 and 114 of the Evidence Act. Section 114 provides that the Court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have

Sajitha Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 2003(1)ALT(Cri)188; I(2003)DMC222

have been the father of the child the conclusive presumption of law under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act can be said to be displaced. The presumption of legitimacy is highly favoured by law and proof of

Abdul Salam Vs. Chalil Sajida and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : I(2003)DMC774

have been the father of the child the conclusive presumption of law under Section 11.2 of the Indian Evidence Act can be said to be displaced. The presumption of legitimacy is highly favoured by law and proof of … The presumption of legitimacy is highly favoured by law and proof of non-access must be clear and satisfactory. Section 112 lays down that if a person was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother

Gautam Kundu Vs. State of West Bengal and Sm. Shaswati Kundu

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 112; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 125

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT130(HC),96CWN751

husband to dispute the paternity of the child is however delineated clearly in Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. Section 112 itself: provides that the conclusive presumption about the paternity and legitimacy of the child born in the wedlock

Bore Gowda and anr. Vs. B. Nagaraju and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 112; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1969Kant8; AIR1969Mys8; ILR1968KAR181; (1968)2MysLJ42

counsel contends that in this case, no question of application of Section 112 of the evidence of Indian Evidence Act arises as this was not a case where the defendants admitted the marriage between plaintiff-2 and Byregowda. The