Advanced Search Results

Sripada Gouda Vs. State by Karnataka Lokayuktha Police Station, Dharwa ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

the appellant-accused is entitled to prove those incomes in the manner provided by the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and the Court ought to have considered the evidentiary value of those materials independently of the circumstance of … the said judgment, the appellant-accused is before this Court in this appeal. 7. I have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and also the … and Special Judge, Dharwad in Special (SVC) C.C.No.13 of 1991 convicting the appellant-accused for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the Act of 1988)

Ranjeet vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Act and the disclosure pursuant to the confessional statement is also admissible under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.11. The second limb of arguments put forth by the learned APP for the State is that on the … PW-20, over the telephone. However, statement of PW-20 needs to be deliberated upon only if we hold that Sections 25 and 26 of the Evidence Act do not prohibit or bar admission of the alleged extra judicial … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 411/2018 & Crl. M (Bail) 70/2019 % Judgment reserved on:15th May, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2019

In the Matter of Ashraya and Others Etc. Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7(1), 14, 16, 18 and 19; Guarindians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, and 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10-A - Order 32A, Rule 6; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Special Marriage Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) was amended in 1976; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR1991Kant10

from the shackles of rigorous Rules of evidence as to relevancy or admissibility of evidence under the indian Evidence Act, 1872, by which ordinary Courts are bound. Besides, while Section 15 relieves the Family Court of the burden of … City Civil Judge. Bangalore ('Court of City Civil Judge'), delectating return of the petitions filed by them under Sections 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 ('the G & W Act'), as per Rule 10

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

pointed out thatseizure panchnamas were not in accordance with the procedure and, moreparticularly, Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.(v) All the confessional statements are exculpatory and not inculpatory.In view of the same, the entire statements made are … an intent to overawe the Government as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections of the people, i.e. Hindus and … Hotel. In the abovesaid incident of serialbombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured andproperties worth about Rs. 27 crores were destroyed.

Munna Lal and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Another Etc.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act 1984 - Sections 7, 7(1), 10 and 11 to 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1974 - Sections 127 and 407; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 22, 23, 23(3) and 24 - Order 18, Rule 13 - Order 32A, Rules 2, 3, and 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1981 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Constitution of India - Sections 7A;

Reported in : AIR1991All189; 1991CriLJ1838

entitled to be represented before a Family Court by a legal practitioner and further applicability of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has been dispensed with and it isnot necessary to a Family Court to record evidence of witnesses at … before the Hon'ble Judge dealing with transfer under the C.P.C.17. Reference answered accordingly. Family - family Courts - Sections 7 and 10 of Family Courts Act, 1984, Sections 22, 23, 24 of Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908,

Ram Parshad Rohatgi Vs. Surinder Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 32(7), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 90 and 134

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ674

are more than 30 years old and having regard to the provisions of Section 90 of the India Evidence Act, 1872 (for short, 'the Act'), strict rule of proof regarding the admissibility of these documents is done away with … an assertion of a right to property in dispute. A contention that Judgments other than those falling under Sections 40 to 44 of the Evidence Act were not admissible in evidence was expressly rejected. Again B.K. Mukerjea,

Banarsi Dass Vs. Om Parkash and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65, 74 and 66; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 14; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2005P& H200; (2005)140PLR358

false, forged and fabricated.4. Thereupon, on 12.6.2002, the plaintiff-petitioner filed an application under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'the Act') read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'the Code') … notary public - In such situation, no merit found in revision petition and so, revision petition dismissed - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr. … 227 of the Constitution of India, the plaintiff-petitioner has impugned order dated 7.9.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamal whereby application for leading

Raghunath Misra Vs. Kishore Chandra Deo Bhanj and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83, 100, 100(1), 116A, 123(1), 123(5), 123(7), 140 and 144; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 41, Rule 22; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 191 and 191(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 66, 101 to 104 and 114

Reported in : AIR1958Ori260

his special knowledge as be is bound to do under the provision of Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, and there is really a case like that here. It is further to be borne in mind that … materially affected on the petitioner who impugns the validity of the election, though under the English Act (Ballot Act, 1872, Section 13), the burden is upon the respondent to show the negative, i.e., that the result of the … Vindhya Pradesh District Advisory Councils, was an 'Office' within the meaning of Sections 16 and 17 of the Government of Part C States Act, 1951, … Settlement of 1917-18 the total number of Sarbarakars of the State were 775, for 710 villages ..... Although the State neverrecognised the post of Sarbarakar

Vijayabai and ors. Vs. Shriram Tukaram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agriculture Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1938 - Sections 2(32), 6, 7, 8, 19, 46, 49B and 100(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1999SC431; 1999(1)ALLMR(SC)225; JT1998(8)SC105; 1998(6)SCALE211; (1999)1SCC693; [1998]Supp3SCR54

question referred to in Sub-section (3) the Tahsildar shall, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, or in Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, or in any other law for the time … was a tenant on appointed day, namely, 28th August, 1958 as also recorded and hence by virtue of Sections 46 and 49A is entitled to become statutory owner.6. Before we proceed to decide the controversy it is … by respondent No. 1 from the appellants for a consideration of Rs. 7000. Hence not only the name of respondent No. 1 was deleted but

Premchand Hira Vs. Bai Galal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1927Bom594; (1927)29BOMLR1336

in particular as to whether there is any difference in India arising from the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act. But I entirely agree, as I have already said, that the proper way to avoid the difficulty altogether … marriage was performed by a duly licensed person in pursuance of the requirements of the Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872, we do not know. But I do unhesitatingly say that in every divorce case that has hitherto come … a marriage between native Christians, and it is sufficient to refer to Sections 60 and 61 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872. The latter … draw the attention of the Court to the fact that under Section 7 of the Act, relief has to be given 'on principles and rules