Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: evidence act 1872 sections 32 · Page 1 of about 5,765 results (0.140 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 10 1948

Gurunath Madhav Vs. Mallappa Shantappa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-10-1948

Subject : Civil

Acts : Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1879 - Sections 10A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10A and 32

Reported in : AIR1950Bom340; (1950)52BOMLR288

are triable wholly or in part under the Chapter, the Court shall, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 92. Evidence Act, 1872, or in Section 49, Registration Act, 1908, or in any other law for the time being in force, … Section 82, Evidence Act, applied, the statements therein contained fell within Section 32, Clause (3), Evidence Act, and were thus admissible in evidence. It is … learned Judge meant to lay down any such sweeping proposition as has been contended for by Mr. Shah. Sections 91 and 92 cannot be read divorced one from the other and they are both in regard to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2009

State of Rajasthan Vs. Champa Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307; Rajasthan Police Rules, 1964

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW2600; 2009CriLJ2403; JT2009(5)SC352; RLW2009(2)SC1035; 2009(5)SCALE156; (2009)12SCC571; 2009(3)LHSC1546; 2009(4)KCCRSN203

most a set of procedural guidelines. That cannot take away the effect of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the `Evidence Act'). To add to the vulnerability of the High Court's judgment, the High Court … filed by the respondent directing his acquittal. Respondent faced trial for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2002

ibrahimkhan Pirkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154 and 162; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 (1), 145, 155 and 157

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)866; 2003CriLJ1802

with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 154 and 162 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 32 (1), 145, 155 and 157 of Evidence Act, 1872 - appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with … the Court, by prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 28 2006

K. Ramakrishnappa Vs. State by Bandur Camp Police Station

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-28-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 113A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 374(2), 378 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ83

Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh : AIR2004SC1720 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows.-(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Section 32 - Multiple dying declarations - Wife alleged to have poured kerosene oil on … and recorded the statement of P.W. 1 and on the same night, registered the case for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the IPC, in the presence of P.W. 1 and submitted the FIR. Inspite of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

Jaishree Anant Khandekar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 302 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW5997; JT2009(4)SC198; 2009(4)SCALE172; (2009)11SCC647; 2009(3)LHSC1439

are applicable in the facts of the present case. Those excerpts are extracted hereunder:5. Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to the general rule against hearsay. Sub-section (1) of Section 32 makes the statement of … were given by the deceased-Aruna.8. In this matter six persons had to face the trial for charges under Section 498A read with Section 34 of I.P.C.9. The present appellant was charged for an offence of murder under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2008

Vikas and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 342 and 498A

Reported in : JT2008(1)SC541; 2008(1)SCALE545; 2008AIRSCW915; 2008(2)SCC516; (2008)1SCC(Cri)486; 2008(1)Crimes288; 2008(1)LH(SC)567

Court.19. The question thus is confined to evidentiary value of dying declarations of Rekha. Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') deals with statement by persons who cannot be called as witnesses either … Bench) on December 20, 2005 in Criminal Appeal No. 321 of 2005 convicting them for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The High Court, by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2009

Kanti Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 482; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1) and 113B

Reported in : AIR2009SC2703; 2009(6)SCALE116; (2009)12SCC498; 2009AIRSCW4147

each case for the purpose of admissibility of such statement as dying declaration under Section 32[1] of the Evidence Act, 1872.26. In Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar v. State of Maharashtra : 2004CriLJ615 , this Court on scrutiny of the evidence … dismissing the appeal of Arvind Kumar [A-1] and Kanti Lal [A-3] and confirming their conviction and sentence under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short the 'IPC'] recorded by the learned Sessions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2004

State of U.P. Vs. Veer Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 155 and 157

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3835; 2004(5)SCALE159; (2004)10SCC117

when maker of purported dying declaration survives the same is not statement under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short the 'Evidence Act') but is a statement in terms of Section 164 of the Code. It … 302, 307 and 452 - Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 - Section 164 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 155 and 157 - Dying declaration - Admissibility of - Prosecution of respondents five in number with three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Maniben W/O Danabhai Tulshibai Maheria Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3187; I(2007)DMC801SC; [2007(3)JCR140(SC)]; 2007(2)KLT965(SC); 2007(7)SCALE93; (2007)10SCC362; 2007AIRSCW3501; AIR2007SC1932; JT2007(7)SC551.

Alias Kutti Ravi v. State of T.N. : 2006CriLJ1625 , wherein this Court opined;5. Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to the general rule against hearsay. Sub-section (1) of Section 32 makes the statement of … Mr. Raichura on Ravikumar Alias Kutti Ravi v. State of T.N. : 2006CriLJ1625 , wherein this Court opined;5. Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to the general rule against hearsay. Sub-section (1) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1979

Shantidevi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-1979

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi183

by Shnm Wati. These contentions are devoid of force. Clauses (1) and (2) of Section 32 of the Evidence Act, 1872 say : '(1) When the statement is made by a person as to the cauced his death, or … widow of Patti Ram, resident of House No. 2589, Bagichi Raghunath, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, who was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated February 28, 1976 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial