Advanced Search Results

Shanti Sarup Vs. Radhaswami Satsang Sabha, Dayalbagh Agra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 9; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 13, 19 and 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21, 31, 34, 114 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 15, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 22; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 2(6) and 17; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 122; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Hindu Law; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1969All248

of not less than three of the members of the governing body. 23. Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, lays down that the Court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have … the plaintiff Sabha was registered as a society under Act No. 21 of 1860 on 17th November, 1921. Sections 1 to 3 of Act No. 21 of 1860 read as follows:-- '1. Any seven or more persons

Syed Fahim Arif and anr. Vs. Rahmatunnisa Begum and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57, 57(6), 65, 82, 85 and 90; Stamp Act; Notaries Act, 1957; Indian Registration Act - Sections 33; Indian Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oath and Fess) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 142; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27; Muslim Law; Mohammedan Law

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD545

and A-6(a) definitely cannot be sustained especially in the light of Sections 82 and 85 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. The Counsel also made elaborate submissions relating to oral gift which is recognized by the Muslim Law and … appellants/plaintiffs who were non-suited by the learned VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in O.S. No. 318/96 dated 28-1-2002. The suit was instituted by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration that they are the lawful owners of

Ahmed HusseIn Vali Mohammed Saiyed and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 5, 15, 15(1), 19, 20(3) and 28; Arms Act - Sections 23(1), 25(1) and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120, 120B, 148, 149 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164(1) and 463; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rules 15, 15(3) and 15(5)

Reported in : JT2009(6)SC472; 2009(3)KLJ312; 2009(7)SCALE282; (2009)7SCC254; [2009] 8 SCR 719

to police officers to be taken into consideration.- (1) Notwithstanding anything in the Code or in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, but subject to the provisions of this section, a confession made by a person before a police officer … 4/1996 & 38/1996 whereby the learned Judge convicted the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 120B I.P.C., Sections 25(1)(c) and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 5 of the TADA Act and sentenced them under … Court at Ahmedabad in TADA Case Nos. 8/1993, 144/1993, 2/1996, 4/1996 & 38/1996 whereby the learned Judge convicted the appellants under Section 302 read with

Hardeep Singh Sohal, Etc. Vs. State of Punjab Through C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120-B, 302, 307, 382 and 394; ;Arms Act - Sections 25; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 5, 15, 21 and 28; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 15(1); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act 1872 - Sections 10 and 30; Evidence Act - Sections 10

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)1005; 2004CriLJ4627; 2005(1)CTC350; JT2004(8)SC87; RLW2004(4)SC607; 2004(8)SCALE257; (2004)11SCC612

The extra-judicial confession allegedly made by Balwinder Singh can only be considered under Section 30 of the Indian evidence Act 1872. the extra-judicial confession cannot be admitted in evidence as Balwinder Singh was not tried along with the appellants. … offences such as punishable under Section 120B, 302, 307, 394 IPC; Section 25 of the Arms Act; and Sections 3(1), 3(2) & 3(3) of the Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 [for short, 'the TADA Act']. Along

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

and Sub-section (4) merely provided on alternative mode of proof by way of certification.268. Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872 defines evidence as under:'Evidence' - Evidence means and includes:-1)-------------2) all documents including electronic records produced for the inspection … FIR NO. 417/2001 under Section 121, 121A, 122, 124, 120B, 186, 332, 353, 302, 307 IPC read with Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act was

Ram Singh Vs. Sonia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1B); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 201 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25, 26, 45 and 91; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 164(2), 164(4), 235(2), 281, 354(3), 364, 463, 463(1), 533 and 533(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 136

Reported in : AIR2007SC1218; 2007CriLJ1642; JT2007(3)SC287; 2007(3)SCALE106; (2007)3SCC1; 2007AIRSCW1278; 2007)2SCC(Cri)1; (2007)2Crimes1(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)771.; MANU/SC/7109/2007

been complied with by the recording magistrate, it may, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 91 of the Indian Evidence, Act, 1872, take evidence in regard to such non-compliance, and may, if satisfied that such non-compliance has not injured the … to death and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- each. A-1 and A-2 were further convicted under Sections 25(1-B)(b) and 25(1-B(a) of the Arms Act respectively and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of … of 2005, were tried and convicted by the trial court under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code

Ramesh Ramrao Hate Vs. Parvez B. Bhesania

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13A(2) and 31F; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR407; (1996)98BOMLR784

Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act (57 of 1947), Section 13A(2), Explanation (b) and Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Sections 3 and 4 - Expressions 'Conclusive evidence' and 'Conclusive Proof - Effect of is to give finality to the

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

pointed out thatseizure panchnamas were not in accordance with the procedure and, moreparticularly, Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.(v) All the confessional statements are exculpatory and not inculpatory.In view of the same, the entire statements made are … Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201 and 212 of Indian Penal Code and offences under Sections 3 and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the

Munna Lal and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Another Etc.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act 1984 - Sections 7, 7(1), 10 and 11 to 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1974 - Sections 127 and 407; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 22, 23, 23(3) and 24 - Order 18, Rule 13 - Order 32A, Rules 2, 3, and 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1981 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Constitution of India - Sections 7A;

Reported in : AIR1991All189; 1991CriLJ1838

entitled to be represented before a Family Court by a legal practitioner and further applicability of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has been dispensed with and it isnot necessary to a Family Court to record evidence of witnesses at … to some other court competent to dispose of the application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1981.3. Common … as such, High Court has the jurisdiction to transfer the cases from one Family Court to another under Sections 22, 23 and 24 of the C.P.C. Similarly, when Family Court is exercising the powers and jurisdiction under

D. Pandi Vs. the Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited, by Its Manager, Having Off ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67, 73 and 101 to 103; Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR2001Mad243; (2001)1MLJ750

documents. The plaintiff failed to comply with the provisions contained in Sections 67 and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.(ii) The learned Subordinate Judge failed to follow the procedure prescribed in Sections 45 and 73 of the Indian … tune of Rs.2 lakhs on 22.10.80. It was agreed inter alia between the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 that documents relating to the two loans have to be signed by the defendants 1 to 3 and