Advanced Search Results
Valluri Jaganmohini Seetharama Lakshmi and Another Vs. Kopparthi Ramac ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-25-1994
CivilFamily
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 68 and 70; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1) and (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - 1908 - Order 7, Rule 1
AIR1994AP284; 1994(1)ALT217
of the relevant documents and to construe the same correctly in accordance with law. Section 58 of the Evidence Act, 1872 reads:'Facts admitted need not be proved:-- No fact need be-proved, if any proceeding which the parties thereto or … is allowed in part. Each party shall bear their own costs.15. Appeal allowed. (i) Family - evidence - Sections 58 and 68 of Evidence Act, 1872 - where execution of documents admitted by parties requirement of further … amounts to maintenance capable of enlarging into a fulfledged right under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956; and (2) Whether the defendant in a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeoman Upadhyaya Vs. State
Allahabad
Aug-24-1959
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 27, 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27
AIR1960All1; 1960CriLJ1
on account of denying equality before the law guaranteed by the Article 14 of the Constitution.2. Admission is defined in Section 17 of the Evidence … section that:Nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the provisions of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872.'When, however, the Code was re-enacted in 1898 this provision was somehow dropped. No question of any conflict between … be proved.' Whether the section is an exception to only Section 26, which immediately precedes it, or to Sections 25 and 26, or to Sections 24, 25 and 26 was once a matter in controversy. It is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Waryam Singh Duggal Vs. Savitri Devi
Delhi
Apr-29-1983
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11
ILR1984Delhi214
Savitri Devi conceded that the principle was not applicable. It is apparent from section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that to found an estoppel it must be shown that the person to whom the representation was made … Primarily, it is a relevant piece of evidence. As such, the admissibility of an admission is controlled by sections 17 to 30. lt is intimated by section 31, that as a piece of evidence an admission is … little later.(3) The order for recovery of possession was made under section 14(1)(e) of the Act. It was held: (i) that the premises. had been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chunni Lal and anr. Vs. Vidya Devi and ors.
Delhi
Jan-12-2007
Civil
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 14(1), 14(2), 27 and 39; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Delhi Shops and Establishment Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 116; Indian Registration Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
2007(93)DRJ418
examined to prove the Will in accordance with law and placed reliance on Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as the Evidence Act), which reads as under:68. Proof of execution of document required by … with costs of Rs. 5,000/-. Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.Section 2, 14(1)(a), 14(1)(b), 14(1)(1), 27 and 39 r/w Sections 63, 68 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 116 of Evidence Act, 1872 - Eviction--Denial of title--Execution
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-17-2008
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 10(2), 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 173; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Motor Vehicles Rules
2008ACJ2860; AIR2009SC208; 2008(4)AWC3820(SC); (2008)8MLJ206(SC); (2008)152PLR746; 2008(12)SCALE577:2008AIRSCW7145:2008(6)LHSC3818.
the driver was incompetent or disqualified to driver the truck. With reference to Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the `Evidence Act') it was held that at the time of accident driver was competent to … the driving licence has lapsed, as in the meantime the provisions for disqualification of the driver contained in Sections 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 will not be attracted, would indisputably confer a right upon the … The driver's license was initially valid for the period from 15.12.1997 to 14.12.2000 and thereafter from 29.12.2000 to 14.12.2003. Thereafter, it was again renewed from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarbananda Sonowal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-12-2005
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 1, 13, 14, 19(1), 21, 29(1), 32, 51A, 213 and 355; Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(8), 3(9), 4, 5, 7, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8A, 8A(1), 8A(2), 11(1), 12, 15, 20, 21, 21A, 25 and 28; Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Rules, 1984 - Rule 2, 3 to 8, 9, 10, 10A, 10B, 13 and 14 to 19; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 6A, 6A(1), 6A(3), 6A(6), 6A(7), 9 and 18; Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 1985; Passports Act, 1967; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Immigration Act, 1971; Customs Act - Sections 167(8); Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Ordinance, 1983; Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920; Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; I
AIR2005SC2920; JT2005(6)SC79; (2005)5SCC665
of such particular class or description, as the case may be, shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, lie upon such person.'The legislature then enacted the Foreigners Act, 1946 which repealed the 1940 Act. Section 2(a) … fundamental right to conserve their language, script or culture. Undoubtedly, Article 29(1) confers a fundamental right on all sections of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script … is further averred that since the enforcement of the IMDT Act only 1494 illegal migrants had been deported from Assam upto 30th June, 2001. In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter of Ashraya and Others Etc. Etc.
Karnataka
Mar-30-1990
Family
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7(1), 14, 16, 18 and 19; Guarindians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 7, and 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10-A - Order 32A, Rule 6; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Special Marriage Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) was amended in 1976; Evidence Act, 1872
AIR1991Kant10
from the shackles of rigorous Rules of evidence as to relevancy or admissibility of evidence under the indian Evidence Act, 1872, by which ordinary Courts are bound. Besides, while Section 15 relieves the Family Court of the burden of … rules of procedure by which ordinary courts are bound. So also, Section 14, which empowers the Family Court to receive as evidence any report, statement, … City Civil Judge. Bangalore ('Court of City Civil Judge'), delectating return of the petitions filed by them under Sections 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 ('the G & W Act'), as per Rule
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Manubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Gujarat
May-02-1991
Constitution
Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 - Sections 10(2), 10(7) and 16(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3), 21 and 245; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 132
AIR1992Guj10; (1992)1GLR223
proviso to sub-section (2) of S. 10, be treated as confidential and notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, no Court shall be entitled to compel the Lokayukta, or any public servant to give evidence relating to … legislative competence of the State Legislature in enacting 'The Gujarat Likayukta Act, 1986' as also the provisions of Sections 11 read with Sections 2(2), 15, 16 and 18 of the said Act as ultra vires the Constitution. … public trust, Ahmedabad Panchra Pole Sanstha, the sale agreement was made on 14th July, 1990, the society was registered on 30th December 1989, the State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManita Khurana Vs. Indra Khurana
Delhi
Jan-21-2010
CivilFamily
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 4(3), 5, 7, 7(1), 8, 9, 9(2), 10(3), 11, 13, 14, 15 and 19; Domestic Violence Act; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Article 227
167(2010)DLT58
effectively with a dispute, whether or not the same would be otherwise relevant or admissible under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.(viii) Section 15 does not make it necessary for the Family Court to record the evidence of the witnesses … dismissing the application of the petitioner/defendant for transfer of the suit to the Family Court in view of Sections 7 & 8 of the Family Court Act, 1984. The Counsel for the petitioner was heard on the … exclusive owner of the property in terms of the mutation letter dated 14th August, 1998 issued by the DDA. It was thus contended that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJethalal Nanalal Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
May-03-1967
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 7 and 14; Iron and Steel (Control) Order, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872, - Sections 101 to 104, 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
AIR1968Guj163; 1968CriLJ1065
specified in Rule 4 of the Order, having regard to the provisions of Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the scheme and relevant sections of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and of the Rules of the … from a producer, ac stock holder or a person holding stocks of iron and steel, presumption under Section 14 of the Act cannot be attracted. Differently stated, the argument was that the burden thrown on the accused
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »