Advanced Search Results

Sitaram Sao @ Mungeri Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 133; Criminal Appeal Act, 1907; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 364, 396 and 412; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR2008SC391; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)131; 2008(56)BLJR242; 2007(13)SCALE51; 2007AIRSCW7126; (2008)3SCC(Cri)319; 2008(1)AICLR302

that the alleged confession of this witness does not satisfy the requirements of Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act'). Accused Lalit Sanga had not confessed to his active participation in the occurrence. … of Section 306 Cr.P.C. but also Section 133 read with Section 114 (b) of the Evidence Act. 12. Sections 133 and 114(b) of the Evidence Act read as follows:133. Accomplice- An accomplice shall be a competent witness against

K. Hashim Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 28, 120A, 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D and 489E; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 293 and 306; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 114 and 133; Court of Criminal Appeal Act, 1907

Reported in : AIR2005SC128; 2005CriLJ143; JT2004(10)SC478; 2004(9)SCALE422; (2005)1SCC237

of conspiracy and, therefore, in the background of what has been stated in Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') the evidence of PW-1 is very relevant.21. Both the approvers have spoken about … Court in Bhiva Doulu Patil v. State of Maharashtra, : [1963]3SCR830 , held that the combined effect of Sections 133 and 114 illustration (b) of the Evidence Act was that an accomplice is competent to give evidence but

Sevaka Perumal, Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 364, 392 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 235(2) and 236(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 133; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 133

Reported in : AIR1991SC1463; 1991CriLJ1845; 1991(2)Crimes515(SC); JT1991(2)SC546; 1991(1)SCALE914; (1991)3SCC471; [1991]2SCR711a; 1991(2)LC513(SC)

High Court warranting interference. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. Criminal - approver - Sections 114 and 133 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 235 and 236 of CrPC, 1973 - appellant charged with inducing young boys and murdering them

Bhuboni Sahu Vs. the King

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR955

their Lordships are of opinion that the conviction of the appellant cannot stand. Indian Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Sections 133, 114, ill. (b), 157, 30, 3-Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 164-Accomplice evidence-Independent corrabaration.... Statement under … law in India relating to the evidence of accomplices stands thus :--Even before the passing of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, it had been held by a Full Bench of the High Court of Calcutta in R. v. Elahee

The King-emperor Vs. Nilakanta Alias Brahmachari and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)22MLJ490

special circumstances.' The substantive provision of the Indian code law is contained in Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which, in explicit terms, declares that ' An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; … was not the law that the evidence of an accomplice was irreceivable in evidence without corroboration and that Sections 133 and 114, illustration (b), coincide with the rule in England. They state the rule to be that the

Muthukumarsawmi Pillai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 14Ind.Cas.896

special circumstances.' The substantive provision of the Indian Code law is contained in Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which, in explicit terms, declares that 'An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and … was not the law that the evidence of an accomplice was irreceivable in evidence without corroboration and that Sections 133 and 114, illustration (b), coincide with the rule in England. They state the rule to be that the

Corporation Bank Vs. Mohandas Baliga

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34; Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 133, 134, 135, 139 and 141

Reported in : ILR1993KAR201; 1993(1)KarLJ308

ML A/c No. 1 of 1980 against defendant Nos. 1 and 3 jointly and severally with costs throughout. EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 (Central Act No. 1 of 1872) Section 34 : BANKERS' BOOKS EVIDENCE ACT, 1891 (Central Act No. 18 … third defendant to rely upon his rights as a surety on the basis of the provisions contained in Sections 133, 134, 135, 139 and 141 of the Contract Act, having regard to the terms contained in the guarantee

Ex. Havildar K.P. Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : defense Services Regulations; Army Act - Sections 34, 37, 63, 69, 80, 81, 116, 120, 120(2) and 133; Army Rules - Rules 34 and 81; Evidence Act, 1872; Army Regulations; Military Law

Reported in : 2003(3)SLJ463(Delhi)

seven years of such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.'133. General rule as to evidence.--The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), shall subject to the provisions of this Act, apply to all proceedings before a court-martial.'Army … 27th July 1996 was attached to a different field regiment for his trial by a summary court martial.27. Sections 116 and 120 of the Army Act read thus:'116. Summary of court-martial.--(1) A summary court-martial may be held

Mrinal Das and ors. Vs. State of Tripura

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302 rw 34, 148, 149, 326 and 307; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 173, 306, 307; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 133, 114

Reported in : (2011)9SCC479

the correct meaning and application of this term, it is desirable to mention Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with Illustration (b) to Section 114 which read as under:- 133. Accomplice .- An accomplice shall be … of one subject and have to be considered together. It has further been held:- The combined effect of Sections 133 and Illustration (b) to Section 114, may be stated as follows: According to the former, which is a

M.O. ShamsudhIn Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 133; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)114; 1995(2)Crimes282(SC); JT1995(3)SC367; 1995(2)SCALE298; (1995)3SCC351; 1995(2)LC79(SC)

modification of the sentence of imprisonment all these appeals are dismissed. Criminal - corroboration - Sections 133 of Evidence Act, 1872 - combined reading of Sections 133 and 144 requires some corroboration if conviction is based upon evidence of