Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: evidence act 1872 sections 115 · Page 1 of about 2,700 results (0.137 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 22 1997

V.P. Padmanabhan Nair and ors. Vs. Grasim Industries, Mavoor and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-22-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 16, Rule 1; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 159 and 160

Reported in : AIR1997Ker356

referring to the report to refresh his memory. According to counsel. Sections 159 and 160 of the Indian Evidence Act. 1872 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') permits such a course. He also argued that even if the document … not permitted to refer to a previous document to refresh his memory, is maintainable or not.6. Under Section 115, C.P.C., a revision is maintainable challenging orders of any case decided against which no appeal lies and if

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1998

National Engineering Industries Ltd., Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan an ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-02-1998

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Rajasthan Land Revenue, 1956 - Sections 88 and 102

Reported in : AIR1998Raj229; 1999(1)WLC276

admissions on the record from taking a contrary view against the petitioner. 10. Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for short 'the Act' reads a under : --'When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, … Act of 1956, it has been contended that a Patwari had filed the report on which Notices Under Sections 90-A and 91 of the Act were issued and also interim injunction against the Petitioner-Company under Section 212

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2008

State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Nezone Law House, Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; North Eastern Regional Local Act; North Eastern Regional Local Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 166, 166(1) and 299

Reported in : AIR2008SC2045; 2008(5)ALD65; 2008(2)AWC1851(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN157; 2008(2)GLT(SC)20; JT2008(4)SC470; (2008)5MLJ610(SC); 2008(6)SCALE25; (2008)5SCC609; 2008AIRSCW3211; 2008(2)Supreme856; 2008(5)LH(SC)3080; 2008(3)KCCR1606

down that even though the case would not fall within the terms of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') which enacts the rule of estoppel, it would still be open to a … it was, inter alia, laid down that even though the case would not fall within the terms of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') which enacts the rule of estoppel,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2002

Lvs Power Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P., Limited, Hyderaba ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 11(1) and 21(4)

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD784; 2002(6)ALT582

breach of promise on the basis of the principle of promissory estoppel, under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. 44. In M.P.Sugar Mills v. State of UP., : [1979]118ITR326(SC) , the Supreme Courtheld that a party by, … investments has been welcomed by the private sector in all these fields. To give effect to this policy. Sections 3, 28 and some other sections in the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 were amended. Sections 15-A, 43-A, 57-A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2006

Amarjit Kaur and ors. Vs. Karamvir Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Punjab (Custom) (Power to Contest) Act, 1920 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2006SC2481; 2006(3)AWC2389(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN51; 2006(4)SCALE553; (2006)11SCC610

of estoppel that may arise for consideration which are (1) within ambit of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') (2) election in the strict sense of the term whereby the person electing takes … a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the 'CPC').2. Background facts in a nutshell are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2004

Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 166, 166(1) and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Administrative Law

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(SC)492; JT2004(10)SC500; 2005(1)KLT601(SC); (2005)2MLJ129(SC); 2004(9)SCALE604; (2005)1SCC625; [2005]139STC86(SC)

down that even though the case would not fall within the terms of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') which enacts the rule of estoppel, it would still be open to a … it was, inter alia, laid down that even though the case would not fall within the terms of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') which enacts the rule of estoppel,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2005

Sterlite Indus. (i) Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corpn. of Andhra Pradesh Ltd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2005

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 5A, 5A(1), 14 and 11A; United Nations (Privileges and Immunities) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Central Excise and Tariff Act, 1985; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 6(2), 30 and 31; Central Excise Rules - Rule 173; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(189)ELT266(AP)

now that even though a case may not fall within the terms of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which enacts the rule of estoppel, it would still be open to a person who had acted on … India or JBIC, Japan during performance of the contract, A.P. TRANSCO will not compensate. Refer Clause 15.2.A(e) in Section ITD of Volume-I.'4. Clause 15.2A(e) of the Tender documents referred to in Clause 2.2 reads as under.'(i) Clause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 1952

Allah Rabbul AlmIn and anr. Vs. HasnaIn Ahmad

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-04-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 144; Mahomedan Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 25

Reported in : AIR1952All1011

easyin this Court. (i) Civil - mutwalliship - Article 144 of Limitation Act, 1908 and Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872 - petitioner's sole right to mutwalliship to arise on certain contingency - by family arrangement petitioner agreeing to … of the facts or did not alter his position to his detriment as the result of the representation. Sections 115, 116 and 117, Evidence Act do not exhaust the law of estoppel. All rules of estoppel are not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1991

R.K. Kawatra, Etc. Vs. D.S.i.D.C., Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-1991

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115, 116 and 117; Constitution of India - Artilces 12, 14, 166, 226, 298 and 299; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 4A

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi28

the field of public law. The provisions regarding estoppel contained in Ss. 115 to 117 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 are a mere shadow of what the modern principles of promissory estoppel have come to be. The greatest … dismissed We, however, leave the parties to bear their respective costs.64. Petitions dismissed. Property - promissory estoppel - Sections 115, 116 and 117 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Articles 2, 14, 166, 298 and 299 of Constitution of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2005

Shri Banarsi Dass Vs. Mrs. Teeku Dutta and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 112; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD78(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)601; 2005(4)ALT7(SC); 2005(2)BLJR1122; 2005(5)BomCR778; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN174; 100(2005)CLT73(SC); 2005(3)CTC227; [2005(3)JCR189(SC)]; JT

of Indian Succession Act, 1925, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Sections 4 and 112 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 115 and 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order allowing application seeking DNA test in proceeding for … be compelled to give sample of blood for analysis.10. It was noted that Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') requires the party disputing the parentage to prove non-access in order to dispel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial