Advanced Search Results

Bant Singh and anr. Vs. Niranjan Singh (D) by Lrs. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50 and 60

Reported in : AIR2008SC1512; 2008(2)AWC1369(SC); JT2008(2)SC452; (2008)3MLJ128(SC); 2008(2)SCALE531; (2008)4SCC75; 2008(1)LC428(SC); 2008AIRSCW1611; 2008(3)LH(SC)1978; 2008(2)ICC369; 2008(3)KCCRSN212.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Application of Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is involved in this appeal which arises out a judgment and order dated 27.8.2003 passed by a learned

Lakshmi Vs. Joint Family Manager M.Ganapathy.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 50

evidence adduced by Karuppathal, in favour of the petitioners, is admissible, as per section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.7. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent had submitted that the Review Application, filed by

Kashi Mian and ors. Vs. Basir and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50

Hassanbandi were daughters of Firangi Mian? 13. So far as the provision of Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 is concerned, it provides that 'when the Court has to form an opinion as to relationship of one

Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyad and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 50 and 54; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65 and 66; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR1049; 1995CriLJ2662; 1995(2)Crimes182(SC); 1995(50)ECC117; 1995(78)ELT649(SC); (1995)2GLR1315; JT1995(3)SC489; 1995(2)SCALE576; (1995)3SCC610; [1995]3SCR117; [1

Matched in: Citation 1995(43)BLJR1049; 1995CriLJ2662; 1995(2)Crimes182(SC); 1995(50)ECC117; 1995(78)ELT649(SC); (1995)2GLR1315; JT1995(3)SC489; 1995(2)SCALE576; (1995)3SCC610; [1995]3SCR117; [1

Tulsa and ors. Vs. Durghatiya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2008SC1193; 2008(56)BLJR1033; 2008(1)CTC773; I(2008)DMC161SC; [2008(2)JCR110(SC)]; (2008)2MLJ422(SC); RLW2008(3)SC2143; 2008(1)SCALE432; (2008)4SCC520; 2008(1)LC156(SC); 2008AIRSCW1148; 2008(2)ICC159; 2008(1)LH(SC)458

stayed with Radhika. 9. At this juncture reference may be made to the Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act'). The provision refers to common course of natural events, human conduct and private … presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have occurred. Reading the provisions of Sections 50 and 114 of the Evidence Act together, it is clear that the act of marriage can be presumed

Shyam Lal @ Kuldeep Vs. Sanjeev Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 60, 74 and 112; Hindu Succession Act - Sections 4 and 30

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW5006; AIR2009SC3115; 2009(3)AWC2672(SC); JT2009(8)SC108; (2009)5MLJ1195(SC); RLW2010(1)SC779; 2009(5)SCALE507; (2009)12SCC454; 2009(5)LC2134(SC)

Suit, rightly held as barred by limitation considering pleadings as a whole as set out in plaint. INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Section 74 :[Dalveer Bhandari & H.L. Dattu,JJ] School Leaving Certificate Evidentiary value Held, Document falls within the ambit of … Whether the relationship, particularly regarding parentage, is required to be proved strictly in consonance with the provisions of Section 50 and 60 of the Indian Evidence Act? Can the evidence of persons who having no special means of

Neelakantappa Vs. Ambamma

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 494 to 498

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3969; 1986(1)KarLJ41

up for consideration in the proceedings initiated under Section 125 of the Code. Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 lays down this position. Section 50 reads :'50. Opinion on relationship, when relevant - When the Court has

Suraj Mal Vs. Smt. Keshar Devi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 40 to 44 and 50; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Evidence (Amendment) Act, 1931

Reported in : (2006)142PLR393

always regarded him as her son. Such evidence might have been relevant under Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. However, nothing of that nature has been brought on record to prove the relationship of the plaintiff-appellant with

Ambika Prasad Thakur and ors. Vs. Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 50(2)

Reported in : [1966]1SCR758

be drawn. The presumption of future continuance is noticed hi Illustration (d) to s. 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In appropriate cases, an inference of the continuity of a thing or state of things backwards may be … have held those plots from the time of the Permanent Settlement. The contention is based on fallacious reasoning. Section 50(2) of the Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 raises in a suit or proceeding under the Act a presumption that

Dilu Vs. Dhani Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 50

Reported in : I(1993)DMC399

of any entry from this register, which is duly certified, as provided in Sec. 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving the relation inter se the members of the family … was highly interested witness. These observations are also not in consonance with the provisions of law. According to Section 50 of the Evidence Act when the Court has to form an opinion as to the relationship of one