Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: evidence act 1872 section 17 · Page 1 of about 10,496 results (0.201 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 03 1951

Narsingdas Takhatmal Vs. Radhakisan Rambakas and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-1951

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9

Reported in : (1952)54BOMLR492

entitled to redeem the properties. On the question whether this was barred under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, it was contended by the plaintiff that as he was not a party to the deed of partition … of Rampratap, had advanced moneys-from time to time to the plaintiff between the years 1934 & 1907. On 17-6-1907, the plaintiff executed two sale-deeds in favour of Ramnath one for a consideration of Rs. 5,000 conveying the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2007

Ram Singh Vs. Sonia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1B); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 201 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25, 26, 45 and 91; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 164(2), 164(4), 235(2), 281, 354(3), 364, 463, 463(1), 533 and 533(1); Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 136

Reported in : AIR2007SC1218; 2007CriLJ1642; JT2007(3)SC287; 2007(3)SCALE106; (2007)3SCC1; 2007AIRSCW1278; 2007)2SCC(Cri)1; (2007)2Crimes1(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)771.; MANU/SC/7109/2007

been complied with by the recording magistrate, it may, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 91 of the Indian Evidence, Act, 1872, take evidence in regard to such non-compliance, and may, if satisfied that such non-compliance has not injured the … around circumstantial evidence, extra-judicial confessions made by him to Sunder Singh, PW.48, and Rajni Gandhi, Scientific Assistant, PW 17, the result of the polygraph test to which he was put by the prosecution and the recoveries made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2007

State of Gujarat Vs. Mahmad Sarif Umar Gajal Muslim

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-05-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 297 and 304A; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 112, 116 and 117; Bombay Prohibition Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8, 17 to 31, 145 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 378; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 162, 162(2) and 164

Reported in : 2008CriLJ644

30 of the Evidence Act and Sections 162 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Sections 17 to 31 of the Evidence Act are to be found under the heading 'Admissions'. Confession is a species … officer and is not admissible in evidence against the accused, by virtue of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.20. In Aghnoo Nagesia v. State of Bihar reported in : 1966CriLJ100 , the Supreme Court has enunciated the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 1966

Basant Singh Vs. Janki Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-1966

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1967SC341; 1967(15)BLJR27; [1967]1SCR1

by him in a prior suit is an admission within the meaning of s. 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and may be proved against him in other litigations. The High Court also relied on the English law … but also against a different opponent. Moreover, we are not concerned with the technicalities of the English law. Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 makes no distinction between an admission made by a party in a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2000

Edla Venkat Raj Reddy Vs. Edla Linga Reddy (Died) Per Lrs. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (TA) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 34, 37, 38-E and 99; Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 - Sections 8; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 21; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD654; 2000(5)ALT299

in support of his contention that a party's admission as defined in Sections 17 - 21 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is substantive evidence and if such an admission is unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the party … Smt. Kavita v. State of Maharashtra, reported in AIR 1981 SC 2084 that an admission in view of Section 17 of the Evidence Act furnishes best evidence unless explained. It cannot be disputed that admissions voluntarily made constitute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2005

Piara Singh Vs. Harbhajan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100

Reported in : (2006)142PLR595

loose significance. In any case. the admission is the best piece of evidence under Section 17 of the Evidence Act, 1872, Therefore, no transfer of property by sale is deemed to have taken place.12. It has been repeatedly emphasized

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1999

Duraipandian Vs. Tamiljothi and 3 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-1999

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 -- Sections 17(1) and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 91; Mulla's Registration Act

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC574

evidence. Secondly evidence of the factum of partition will not be admissible by reason of S.91 of the Evidence Act. 1872. (2) partition lists which are mere records of a previously completed partition between the parties, will be admitted … opposed the marking of the document on the ground that the document dated 21.4.1996 is compulsorily registerable under Section 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act and consequently, it should not be considered for any purpose. The lower

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2008

Mohmed AmIn @ AmIn Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh and anr. Vs. C.B.i. Thro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 15, 15(1), 18, 20(8), 21 and 21(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 34, 114, 120A, 120B, 176 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1) and 27; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135 and 135(1); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 268, 313, 342, 437 and 439; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 - Rule 15, 15(1) and 15(5); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 24 to 30; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17; Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR529; 2008(6)LHSC4434

made to Police Officers to be taken into consideration- (1)Notwithstanding anything in the Code or in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), but subject to the provisions of this section, a confession made by a person before … view of the drastic provisions of this Act. More so when the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 under Section 17 and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 under Section 13, authorise only a police officer of a specified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1992

R. Dilip Kumar Vs. S. Ramu

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-19-1992

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 18

Reported in : ILR1992KAR2905; 1992(3)KarLJ685

a plaint signed and verified by him in a prior suit is an admission within the meaning of Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and may be proved against him in other litigations. The High Court … are the joint family properties.6. In BASANT SINGH v. JANAKI SINGH : [1967]1SCR1 it has been held as follows:'Evidence Act (1872), Sections 21, 17 and 18 - Admission by party in plaint signed and verified by him - Admission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1956

Ajodhya Prasad Bhargava Vs. Bhawani Shanker Bhargava and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-08-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17, 21, 31, 58, 101 to 104 and 145

Reported in : AIR1957All1

singularly clear. Fortunately the law of India pronounces no uncertain sound upon the same matter. By Section 145, Evidence Act, 1872, it is provided that 'A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing … substantive evidence in the case without drawing in cross-examination the attention of the opponent to those admissions?' 47. Section 17, Evidence Act defines an admission as 'a statement, oral or documentary, which suggests any inference as to any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial