Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: estates partition act 1897 section 19 · Page 1 of about 186 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 1909

Ananda Kishore Chowdhry Vs. Daije Thakurain

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-09-1909

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1909)ILR36Cal726

Court Fees Act. Partition - Estates Partition Act Bengal VIII of 1876), Section 63, and (Bengal v. of 1897), Section 2, Clause (6)--Private Partition--Partition Proceedings commenced under Act V of 1876 (B.C.) whether governed by Act V of … litigation, had been privately partitioned and could not form the subject-matter of partition by the Collector under the Estates Partition Act. There has been no investigation into the facts of the case, but the Subordinate Judge has dismissed the … Collector, the application for partition fulfils the requirements of Sections 18 and 19, that is, is in proper form and is accompanied by the necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1914

Neogendra Mohan Ray and anr. Vs. Pyari Mohan Saha and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-28-1914

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1915Cal339,30Ind.Cas.420

been assigned by private partition. Thereafter, on a partition of the entire estate by the Collector under the Estates Partition Act, these lands were allotted to the plaintiffs, but they were unable to obtain possession thereof, as the defendants … of dismissal made by the Subordinate Judge, and have contended that under Section 99 of Act V of 1897 B.C., the lands in their hands are not subject to the tenure set up by the defendants. In … 14 C. 791 at p. 793 and Balmukund Kesurdas v. Bhagwandas Kesurdas 19 Ind. Cas. 401 : 15 bom. L.R. 209 a plaintiff cannot be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1909

Ananda Kishore Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Daiji Thakurani

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-09-1909

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1Ind.Cas.549

had been privately partitioned and could not form the subject matter of partition by the Collector under the Estates Partition Act. There has been no investigation into the facts of the case but the Subordinate Judge has dismissed the … partition--Estates Partition Act (VIII B.C. of 1876), Sections 12, 24, 26, 31 and 149--Estates Partition, Act (B.C.V of 1897), Section 2 Clause (c)--Limitation Act (XV of 1877), Schedule II, Article 14--Jurisdiction, order without, nullity--Evidence--Possession--Entry in Collector's order-sheet--Suit not … Collector the application for partition fulfills the requirements of Sections 18 and 19, that is, is in proper form and is accompanied by the necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 11 1916

Nuri Miah Vs. Ambica Singh and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-1916

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 34Ind.Cas.869

been made by the Trial Court. The property was the subject of the proceeding for partition under the Estates Partition Act, 1897, instituted before the Collector on the 15th May 1909. The partition proceedings were completed on the 2nd September … proceedings were completed on the 2nd of December 1913, by reason of the issue of the notice under Section 92 of Estates Partition Act. The first decree in this suit, as I have already-mentioned, was on the … Lancelot Sanderson, C.J.Rule No. 326 of 1916.1. In this case the action was for pre-emption. The suit was dismissed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1933

Sachindra Kumar Roy and ors. Vs. Nabendra Kishore Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-1933

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1934Cal155

Kharija Taluk Gour Kishore Roy. The plaintiff applied to the Collector for partition of the estate under the Estates Partition Act (5 of 1897). To this the defendants objected on the ground of Section 7 of the Act, namely, … Specific Relief Act, as has been understood in such cases as Ram Chandra v. Secretary of State AIR 1916 Mad 1061 and Bam Krishna v. Narayana AIR 1915 Mad 584, the plaintiff gains very little; because in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1928

Haran Chandra Saha and anr. Vs. Behari Lal Bhumia and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-25-1928

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1928Cal560

had been given to show why he had not that power.4. According to the learned Judges Section 81, Estates Partition Act, 1897 distinctly gave him that power though, no doubt, it imposes the condition that it must be reasonably necessary … and Mehar Ali transferred to the defendants appellants a portion of the holding comprising settlement plots 189 and 190 of mauza Kedarpur appertaining to Estate No. 4054 and the defendants were in possession of that portion of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1981

The Chief Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Raj Kishan Goel

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-15-1981

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 2; Delhi Sales Tax Rules, 1951 - Rule 10

Reported in : 21(1982)DLT15; [1982]50STC1(Delhi)

Act, 1922 as is dear from Section 3 of that Act. The partition of the Hindu undivided family has' the effect of disruption of the … would include a firm being a body of individuals by force of Section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act, 1897. There is nothing repugnant in the subject or context to exclude the application of this definition contained in … The Legislature not having made any provision generally for the assessment of income receivable on behalf of the estate of the deceased person the expression 'any tax which would have been payable by him under this Act … S.S. Chadha, J. (1) Under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 as extended to the Union Territory of Delhi and the Delhi Sales

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1914

Anand Kisore Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Daiji Thakurain

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-18-1914

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1915Cal571,28Ind.Cas.580

the 9th March 1907 on the ground that it was not maintainable under the provisions of the Bengal Estates Partition Act, 1897. This decision was reversed by this Court on the 9th March 1909, and the case was remitted to … mutual consent and for mutual convenience, there was No. such final and definitive partition as is contemplated in Section 12 of the Estates Partition Act, 1876, and as would effectively deprive the Collector of his jurisdiction. Tins … Estates Partition Act. 1876. The suit was commenced on the 9th April 1906 and was dismissed by the Subordinate Judge on the 9th March 1907

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2012

Vasudeva Menon and Others Vs. M/S. K.J. Plantation

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

by document No.953/1978 executed by the above persons. According to the petitioner, M/s. K.J. Plantations consists of three estates that is Mount Rubi Estate, which is item No.1 in the E.P., Saphire Estate which is item No.2 … F. A. No.12/2010 is directed against the order in EA. No.38/09. The said Suit, OS.No.1/64 was one for partition. Following a preliminary decree, a final decree came to be passed. As per the final decree, the appellants … both the parties. A1 purports to be the lease of the year 1897. A2 is the copy of the agreement between the lessor and Anglo … efflux of time as per Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act. The lease was not renewed and they have relinquished their leasehold right … defendants 16 to 21 in O.S No.1 of 1964 on the file of the District Court, Palakkad.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1953

Pushavathi Vijayaram Gajapathi Raj Manne Sultan Bahadur, Raja of Vizia ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-16-1953

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Madras Impartible Estates Act, 1904; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Tenancy Law; Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 12, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 45 and 66(1)

Reported in : AIR1955Mad219

with reference to any given piece of property. The second question was whether the provisions of the Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, Act XXVI of 1948 hereinafter referred to as the Abolition Act, overrode … Rajagopalan, J.1. The preliminary decree in this suit defining the shares for the partition of the properties among the heirs of Alak Narayan, was issued on 11-9-1950. There was no dispute either … any incorporation. Apart from other considerations, Chitti Babu was a minor between 1897 and 1904. There could therefore be no question of any incorporation during … the Abolition Act affect the par-tibility or otherwise of these items. 32. Section 12 of the Abolition Act concludes, in my opinion, the rights of … the application she filed. Appln. No. 4830 of 1950. Rani Vidya-vathi claimed 55 items of jewellery as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial