Advanced Search Results
Lakhi Chowdhuri and ors. Vs. Akloo Jha and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-01-1911
Land Acquisition
13Ind.Cas.123
the joint owners of an estate which is now in course of partition under the provisions of the Estates Partition Act of 1897. In the partition proceedings the first defendant put forward a claim that he was the tenant … had not been joined as a party and, secondly, that the suit was barred under the provisions of Section 25 of the Bengal Estates Partition Act.2. In respect of the first objection, the learned Judge held that … 1. This appeal is directed against a decree of dismissal in a suit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirwardhary Singh Vs. Bachu Singh and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-23-1909
PropertyCivil
5Ind.Cas.454
was approved and in April of that year the proprietors came, in under Section 51 of the Bengal Estates Partition Act (1897) and applied to have the partition made by arbitrators three of whom were named.2. It appears that the … 1. The question that arises in this second appeal is whether a Civil Court has jurisdiction to set aside
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHem Chandra Chakravarti and ors. Vs. Sarabala Datta and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-25-1929
Property
AIR1930Cal265,121Ind.Cas.747
1915, declaring the estates to be under separation and also under partition under Sections 5, 6 and 29, Estates Partition Act (Beng. 5 of 1897). An estimate of cost was prepared - cost of separation of the lands of … drawn up on 24th July 1915, declaring the estates to be under separation and also under partition under Sections 5, 6 and 29, Estates Partition Act (Beng. 5 of 1897). An estimate of cost was prepared - … for a declaration that the order of the Collector of Backerganj, dated 1st November 1920, for refund of a certain amount of money deposited by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sachindra Kumar Roy and ors. Vs. Nabendra Kishore Roy
Kolkata
May-15-1933
Property
AIR1934Cal155
Kharija Taluk Gour Kishore Roy. The plaintiff applied to the Collector for partition of the estate under the Estates Partition Act (5 of 1897). To this the defendants objected on the ground of Section 7 of the Act, namely, … The plaintiff applied to the Collector for partition of the estate under the Estates Partition Act (5 of 1897). To this the defendants objected on the ground of Section 7 of the Act, namely, that the lands
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPriyanath Roy Vs. Sreedhar Chandra Roy and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-10-1943
Civil
AIR1945Cal28
under appeal in the Court below, the plaintiff has applied for partition of the estate under the Bengal Estates Partition Act, 1897. This he did on 27th August 1941, and on 15th April 1942, the Collector apparently made an order … one-fourth. The main point taken before us is that the decree is incompetent or irregular by reason of Section 154, Civil P. C. This section runs:Where the decree is for the partition of an undivided estate assessed … is that the decree is incompetent or irregular by reason of Section 154, Civil P. C. This section runs:Where the decree is for the partition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaran Chandra Saha and anr. Vs. Behari Lal Bhumia and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-25-1928
Tenancy
AIR1928Cal560
had been given to show why he had not that power.4. According to the learned Judges Section 81, Estates Partition Act, 1897 distinctly gave him that power though, no doubt, it imposes the condition that it must be reasonably necessary … Suhrawardy, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit by the plaintiffs for eject meat of defendants 1 and 2 from the lands in suit on the allegation that the holding was abandoned by the former
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKedar Nath Sanyal and ors. Vs. Naresh Chandra Ghosh and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-17-1930
Civil
AIR1931Cal29
defendant before us, two points have been taken : (1) that the suit is barred under Section 119, Estates Partition Act 1897; (2) that the suit is barred by limitation under Article 14, Lim. Act. It [may be noted that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMt. Matangini Ghose and ors. Vs. Mt. Monmohini Ghose and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-05-1927
Property
AIR1928Cal41
Page, J.1. This appeal depends upon the true construction of Section 149, Estates Partition Act (8 of 1876), now Section 119 of Act Section 1897. Section 149 runs as follows:No order of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra Gopal Roy and ors. Vs. Matanginti Alias Susamoyi Debya and or ...
Kolkata
Aug-22-1918
Land Acquisition
AIR1919Cal215,49Ind.Cas.965
that the Deputy Collector had power to make the order which he did under Section 83 of the Estates Partition Act of 1897, and...thirdly, if he failed upon the first two points, then he wishes to rely upon the … had power to make the order which he did under Section 83 of the Estates Partition Act of 1897, and...thirdly, if he failed upon the first two points, then he wishes to rely upon the argument that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Biswas and ors. Vs. Rash Mohan Saha and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-18-1923
Property
AIR1924Cal245,81Ind.Cas.29
into the question of the correctness of the orders passed in the partition proceedings.7. Section 119 of the Estates Partition Act (V of 1897) provides that no order made under certain sections and Chapters of the Act including Chap. … 1. This appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of the Plaintiff's title to the land in dispute
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »