Advanced Search Results
State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Shriram Babulal Chaurasiya
Mumbai
Mar-05-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C and 15
1992(3)BomCR201
Officers, the suit is not tenable at all in view of the provisions of section 15 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Section 15 of the Essential Commodities Act reads as under:' (1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie … Officers, the suit is not tenable at all in view of the provisions of section 15 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Section 15 of the Essential Commodities Act reads as under: (1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu and Others Vs. M/S. Sanjeetha Trading Co. and Othe ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-24-1992
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301, 302, 303 and 304; Tamil Nadu Timber (Movement Control) Order, 1982; Tamil Nadu Timber Rules, 1968; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Mysore Forest Act, 1900 - Sections 37
AIR1993SC237; 1992(2)SCALE635; (1993)1SCC236; [1992]Supp1SCR840
K. Ramanathan (supra) it will appear that in exercise of the power conferred under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture (Department of Food) Order dated June 9, 1978, with the … Rules, 1959 came up for consideration. The said Rules had been framed in exercise of the power under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. By aforesaid Rule 8-C, leases for quarrying black
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Sriganganagar and anr. Vs. M/S. Madan ...
Rajasthan
Feb-09-2000
Commercial
Sugar (Price Control) Order, 1979; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 15, 16, 19A, 23, 24, 27, 65, and 68 to 72
2000(4)WLC506; 2000(3)WLN113
Control) Order 1979 on 12.9.79 by the Central Government in exercise of its powers u/Sec. 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, the maximum ex-factory price of sugar as well as maximum price at which sugar could be sold in … The refund of excess price to the purchaser has not been provided in law. He invited attention to Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act: It was urged that no ingredients of coercion as envisaged therein is shown
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State of Gujarat Vs. Janta Pauva Factory and ors.
Gujarat
Jun-17-1982
Civil
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 15(2); Gujarat Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1966; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 91; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80
AIR1983Guj64; (1983)1GLR378
of the State firstly urged that the suits were not maintainable in view of Section 15(2) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Section 15(2) runs as under:'15(2). No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Government for any damage
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Belsund Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-10-1999
Commercial
Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 - Sections 2(1), 3(1) 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 15, 18, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 46, 48, 49, 50(1), 51, 52 and 58 - Rule 82; Bihar Sugarcane(Regulation of Supply & Purchase) Act, 1981; Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1975; Sugar(Control) Order, 1966; Sugar(Packing & Marking) Order, 1970; Sugar(Restriction on Movement) Order, 1970; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 132(1), 133(1), 142, 145 and 254(1); Industries(Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Rice Milling Industry(Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1); Tea Act, 1953 - Sections 30(1); Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Bihar Molasses(Control) Act, 1947; Bihar Sugarcane Act, 1979 - Bihar Sugarcane
AIR1999SC3125; 1999(4)ARBLR502(SC); 1999(3)BLJR2191; JT1999(5)SC422; 1999(4)SCALE516; (1999)9SCC620; [1999]Supp1SCR146
1966 as well as the Sugar (Control) Order of the same year issued under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and also the provisions of the Bihar Molasses (Control) Act, 1947 fully occupied the field of regulation of … factories undertaking the purchase and sale of the concerned transactions. In the alternative, it was contended that once Section 15 of the Market Act is out of picture and once it remains an admitted position that the appellant-sugar
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCipla Limited, Mumbai and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-31-2001
Commercial
Drug Price Control Order, 1995; Constitution of India - Article 14; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3
2002(1)ALLMR75; (2002)1BOMLR62; 2002(2)MhLj631
India but exported. It is further submitted that the DPCOs only exercise power under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and cannot purport to nor are they intended to regulate prices of essential commodities, i.e. drugs outside the … Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1995 and pursuant to the New Drug Policy 1994 issued on 15th September, 1954 by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India. Previously, the following drugs price control
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-06-2006
Commercial
Madhya Pradesh Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1958 - Sections 1(1), 1(2), 1(3), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4), 21, 22; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972 - Sections 4, 4(2), 15, 6, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 37, 37(1), 37(2); Sugar Cane (Control) Order, 1966; Bihar Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1982; Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1986; Tobacco Board Act - Sections 8(2), 13, 13A, 14, 14A and 32; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 6A and 6A(2); Tobacco Board Rules, 1976 - Rule 32;Tobacco Board (Auction) Rules, 1984; Tobacco Board (Auction)
2006(3)MPLJ433; (2008)16VST591(MP)
and by the Sugar Cane (Control) Order, 1966 made by the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and that the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972 which regulates the buying and selling of agricultural produce … upon him by or under the Act. Section 12 states that the Cane Commissioner may, for purposes of Section 15, 16 or 17 by order, require the occupier to furnish in the manner and by the date specified
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Jan-10-1972
Constitution
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(2) and 3(3); Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
AIR1972Delhi159
an essential commodity. Parliament has, thereforee empowered the Central Government under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter called the Act) to promulgate Orders to provide for regulating or prohibiting the production, supply and distribution … of production for D-29 grade of sugar plus return pet quintal for the season 1970-71 comes to Rs. 151.15 per quintal while the price fixed by the Government was only Rs. 124.63, the loss suffered by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-1974
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Sugar (Control) Order, 1966
AIR1975SC460; (1974)2SCC630b; [1975]1SCR956
by the Govt. and its officers for actions of the nature sought to be quashed by the appellants, Section 15 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, lays down :15(1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie … excess of the power to fix price. This power is confined to fixation for the purposes mentioned in Essential Commodities Act, 1955. In any case, the appellants' objections could form the subject matter of representations which could have been made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Nankram Ahuja Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Sep-25-2014
Miscellaneous
merchants but they had not taken the delivery. The trial Court rightly relied on Section 10-C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to presume existence of a culpable mental state on the part of accused. Under Section 14 of the … proved as Exh. 25. He accepted that, notice Exh. 26 was issued asking the accused to appear on 15.12.1995. Similarly, he admitted that he had issued order Exh. 27 rejecting the application. Thus, the accused himself brought
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »