Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: equal remuneration rules 1976 rule 05 · Page 1 of about 57 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 05 2006

K.V. Kamath Vs. Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Equal Remuneration Rules, 1976 - Rule 6; ;Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 10(1); ;Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 2; ;Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 2

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN658,[2007(113)FLR853],(2007)ILLJ936Cal

C-3006 of 2002 under Section 10(1)(a) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 read with Rule 6 of the Equal Remuneration Rules, 1976 and for setting aside the orders dated 04.06.2003 to 05.04.2004 passed therein, pending in the Court of learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2024

Sri Vishal Sharma vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-2024

Magistrate Traffic Court, Bengaluru in C.C.No.168/2020 registered for the offence punishable under Section 10(1)(a) and (b) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1976 for short). Petitioners have further prayed to quash the … of the Equal Remuneration Act 1976. On found guilty of contravene of Rule 6 Section 10 (1) (a) (b) of Equal Remuneration Act. The accused … connected matters challenging the proceedings initiated against them under the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Rules, 1958 raising similar contentions. This Court placing reliance on various judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has allowed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2013

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the marginalized section of society. The second set of Legislations, being quoted on illustrative basis, are (a) Equal Remuneration Act, 1976; (b) Pre- conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994; (c) Transplantation of … as such like procedural difficulties can be effectively streamlined by the Appellate Court through an appropriate set of rules or instructions to its Registry. For example, if the appeal is preferred by other than a Class-I legal … provisions of the Code pose a serious threat to the well- known rule of harmonious interpretation and lead to some of those unconciliatory eventualities which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2014

M/S. Century Central Vs. State of Karnataka, Urban Development Departm ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bonus Act, 1965, the Payment of Wages Act, 1936,, the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, Gratuity Act, 1972, the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961; (ii) "Authority" includes a local authority or … of such a meeting along with agenda had to be issued under Rule 4(2) of Karnataka Industries Facilitation Rules, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as 'Facilitation Rules'). In the instant case, fifth respondent's project proposal was riot part … are at Annexures "A" to "H". Annexure "J" is the communication dated 05/11/2011 issued by the fifth respondent, stating that the land in question cannot

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2023

M/s Creative Garments Ltd. Vs. Kashiram Verma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-2023

Subject : Education

Wages Act, 1936; (ii) The Minimum Wages Act, 1948; (iii) The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; (iv) The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. 82. Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (i) The Factories Act, 1948; (ii) The … all the applicants are required to furnish their addresses as per Form-B annexed to Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules 1937.15. Under Workman Compensation Act 1923, when an application is filed by a workman for compensation, he is … furnish their addresses as per Form-B annexed to Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules 1937.15. Under Workman Compensation Act 1923, when an application is filed by … for the workman was recorded that he will report for duty on 05.11.2007 at 10:00 A.M. The order reads as under:3. “1. The learned Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

practices that further inequality and sometimes even criminalizing certain customs, resulted in legislations such as the 1 0 Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (which guaranteed equal pay for equal work regardless of the sex of the worker), the Dowry … (CIVIL) NO(S). 129 OF2023WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 260 OF2023TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 05 OF2023TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 06 OF20232 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 319 OF2023TRANSFERRED … sense codified and recognized existing customs - such as by enacting prohibited degrees of relationships, rule against insanity, rules enabling declaration of nullity or divorce on ground of impotence, etc., - others were meant to further interests

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2025

The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (Kptcl) vs Sri Na ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-24-2025

all the works being done by the Rural Electric Representatives are uniform in all the Electricity Supply Companies equal remuneration can be provided.3. As the Rural Electric Representatives are carrying outthe major responsibilities of the Company, apart from … after publishing newspaper advertisements. The eligibility criteria was not uniform among all the 5 companies and the reservation rules was followed only by GESCOM only in the first appointment process. None of the other Electricity Supply Companies … criteria was not uniform among all the 5 companies and the reservation rules was followed only by GESCOM only in the first appointment process. None … appearing for the private respondents.3. The brief facts are stated as follows:-On 05.02.2004, the Chief Minister of Karnataka in his budget speech articulated that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2022

Union Of India Vs. Munshi Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

in Application for Addl. Docs. i.e. IA No.137388/2021].. iii. Clause 9: Commission vendors are not entitled to any remuneration except commission on sale of articles [@Pg. 35 in Application for Addl. Docs. i.e. IA No.137388/2021].. xxx xxx … of General Manager. Age Limit 18-28 years relaxable Not defined. up to 05 yrs. Wages Daily rate wages Work on commission basis governed by after … aforesaid differentia between the casual labourers and the commission vendors and the law on unequals not being treated equally. Ms. Madhavi Divan, learned ASG has relied upon the decisions of this Court in the cases of Haryana … Vol. II, 1991 (IREM) r/w Rule 31 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 (for short, ‘1993 Rules’), are entitled to include 50% of their

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2015

Devendra Narain Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the lower pay scale of Rs.22,400-525-24,500 to him.14. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the principle of equal pay for equal work is a well settled principle, and it has been violated by the respondents, by … following as Rule 13:“The Chairman or a member of the Tribunal shall not be entitled for any salary, remuneration, allowance or any other benefits to which the Chairman or member is entitled under these rules, if the … 1978”) framed under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (hereinafter “SAFEMA”), whereby he is being denied a higher pay scale applicable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2015

Devendra Narain Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the lower pay scale of Rs.22,400-525-24,500 to him.14. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the principle of equal pay for equal work is a well settled principle, and it has been violated by the respondents, by … following as Rule 13:“The Chairman or a member of the Tribunal shall not be entitled for any salary, remuneration, allowance or any other benefits to which the Chairman or member is entitled under these rules, if the … 1978”) framed under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (hereinafter “SAFEMA”), whereby he is being denied a higher pay scale applicable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial