Advanced Search Results

irene Fernandes Vs. Neo Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR633

she was being paid only Rs. 700/- p.m.. The petitioner therefore filed claim under Section 7(1)(b) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 claiming payment at the same rate at which her male counterpart i.e. Vithal Shetty was paid.3. The Assistant

People's Union for Democratic Rights and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOi) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17, 21, 23, 24 and 32; Employment of Children Act, 1938 - Sections 3(3); Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 13 to 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 20 and 21; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Labour Law; Equal Remuneration Act, 1946; Equal Remuneration (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1982SC1473; 1982(0)BLJR401; (1982)IILLJ454SC; 1982(1)SCALE818; (1982)3SCC235; [1983]1SCR456; 1982(14)LC657(SC)

of Rs. 9.25 per day. The petitioners also alleged in the writ petition that the provisions of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 were violated and women workers were being paid only Rs. 7/- per day and the balance of the … construction industry is not a process specified in the Schedule and is therefore not within the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of that Act. Now unfortunately this contention urged on behalf of the respondents is well

People's Union for Democratic Rights and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOi) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 21; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 12; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 4 and 5; Employment of Children Act, 1938 - Sections 3; Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 13 to 17

Reported in : AIR1982SC1473b; 1982(30)BLJR401; [1982(45)FLR140]; 1982(1)SCALE817; (1982)2SCC494; 1982(14)LC553(SC)

(Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970, Section 12 of the Minimum Wages Act, Sections 4 and 5 of the Equal Remuneration Act 1976, Section 3 of the Employment of Children Act 1938 and Sections 13 to 17 of the Inter-state Migrant Workmen (Regulation

M/s. Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Audrey D'costa and another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 39, 119, 136 and 226; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1987SC1281; (1987)2CompLJ165(SC); 1987(89)Crimes156; [1987(54)FLR530]; JT1987(2)SC34; (1987)ILLJ536SC; 1987(1)SCALE627; (1987)2SCC469; [1987]2SCR659; 1988(1)SLJ196(SC);

No. 1042 of 1986, the question whether the petitioner had violated the provisions of Section 4 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (No. 25 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') arises for consideration.2. The petitioner is a company … 'Water Transport' in the list of establishments and employments to which the Act has been made applicable under Sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Act. Respondent No. 1 Audrey D'Costa was one of the employees working under

Sita Devi and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 32; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC2764; [1996(74)FLR2386]; JT1996(7)SC438; (1996)IILLJ817SC; 1996(6)SCALE151; (1996)10SCC1; [1996]Supp5SCR173; 1996(2)LC513(SC); (1997)1UPLBEC567

after referring to the definition of 'same work or work of a similar nature' in Section 2(h) of Equal Remuneration Act 1976, that :the stress is upon the similarity of skill, effort and responsibility when performed under similar conditions. Further, … classification on basis of technical qualification or educational qualification is valid and acceptable. - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Section 3: [S.B.Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi & Aftab Alam,JJ] Child witness - Eye-witness, child of 13 years - Incident leading

U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sant Raj Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 - Sections 3 and 16; ;Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 to 16 and 39

Reported in : AIR2006SC2296; (2006)IIILLJ509SC; (2006)4MLJ618(SC); 2006(6)SCALE205; (2006)9SCC82; 2007(1)SLJ84(SC)

and Anr. v. Pramod Bhartiya and Ors. : (1993)ILLJ490SC referring to the provisions of Section 2(h) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, this Court stated:13. It would be evident from this definition that the stress is upon the similarity of … incidental thereto. 'Appointed Day' in the said Act was defined to be 3rd July, 1971. In terms of Section 3 of the said Act, on the appointed day, every scheduled undertaking shall, by reason thereof, stand and be

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Audrey D'Costa of Bombay and Anr. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 1(3) and 4(3); Equal Remuneration Ordinance, 1975; Companies Act

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR654; (1986)88BOMLR516

the order dated May 31, 1982 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement). Appellate Authority under the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The facts giving rise to passing of this order are required to be briefly stated to appreciate the … June 30, 1981. Thereafter on September 5, 1981 respondent No. 1 filed application for claim as contemplated by section 7 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 before the authority appointed under the Act. Respondent No. 1 1976 … the petitioner employer is challenging the legality of the order dated May 31, 1982 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement). Appellate Authority under

Air India Vs. Nergesh Meerza and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 16, 16(2) and 19; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 4 and 16; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 45(2); Indian Airlines Corporation Regulations - Regulation 12

Reported in : AIR1981SC1829; 1981LabIC1313; (1981)IILLJ314SC; 1981(3)SCALE1275; (1981)4SCC335; [1982]1SCR438; 1981(2)SLJ349(SC)

Meerza and Ors. as 'petitioners'. (5) Declaration by the Central Government under Equal Remuneration Act as 'Declaration' and Equal Remuneration Act 1976 as '1976 Act'. (6) Air Corporation Act of 1953 as '1953 Act.'(7) Justice Khosla Award as 'Khosla Award' … history which laid to the formation of the two Corporations, viz., A.I. and I.A.C. 3. By virtue of Section 3 of the 1953 Act, the Central Government by a notification published in the official Gazette created two Corporations

D. Roselin Joyce Vs. Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Rep. B ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

in W.P. Nos.21539 to 21548 of2014. In para-8 of the order, learned single Judge has referred to the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, which provided for payment of equal remuneration/pay to men and women workers, for same work or work of … the remedy available to them. 11. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/appellants submit that as per Section 3 of the Act, the petitioners are entitled for confirmation/regularisation of their services with effect from the completion of

State of Madhya Pradesh and Another Vs. Pramod Bhartiya and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 37 and 39; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1993SC286; [1992(65)FLR991]; JT1992(5)SC683; (1993)ILLJ490SC; 1993(I)OLR(SC)448; 1992(2)SCALE791; (1993)1SCC539; [1992]Supp1SCR904

the expressions 'same work or work of similar nature' contained in Clause (h) of Section 2 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The said Act was enacted by Parliament (as pointed out by this Court in Mackinnon Mackenzie v. Andrey … in the doctrine of equality enshrined in Article 14, it flows from it. Because Clause (d) of Article 39 spoke of 'equal pay for equal work for both men and women' it did not cease to be