Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: equal remuneration act 1976 section 1 · Page 1 of about 564 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 26 1987

M/s. Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Audrey D'costa and another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1987

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 39, 119, 136 and 226; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1987SC1281; (1987)2CompLJ165(SC); 1987(89)Crimes156; [1987(54)FLR530]; JT1987(2)SC34; (1987)ILLJ536SC; 1987(1)SCALE627; (1987)2SCC469; [1987]2SCR659; 1988(1)SLJ196(SC);

No. 1042 of 1986, the question whether the petitioner had violated the provisions of Section 4 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (No. 25 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') arises for consideration.2. The petitioner is a company … the list of establishments and employments to which the Act has been made applicable under Sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Act. Respondent No. 1 Audrey D'Costa was one of the employees working under the petitioner till

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2004

Smt. Bimla Rani W/O Sh. Padam Bahadur and ors. Vs. Appellate Authority ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 4 and 7(1)

Reported in : 113(2004)DLT441; [2005(104)FLR34]; (2005)IILLJ148Del; 2005(1)SLJ481(Delhi)

The Petitioners are ladies employed with Respondent No.2. They had filed a claim under Section 7(1)(b) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (the Act) claiming the same pay-scale as granted to men performing the same work. 2. Section 7(1)(b) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2003

Air India CabIn Crew Association Vs. Yeshawinee Merchant and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(2), 51A, 77 and 226; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 15 and 16; Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 45(2); Air Corporations Regulations - Regulation 46(1); Income Tax Act - Sections 89 and 192(2A); Air Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1994; Industrial Employment (Standing Order) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR2004SC187; 2003(4)ALD97(SC); 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)364; JT2003(5)SC413; (2003)IIILLJ1SC; 2003(5)SCALE208; (2003)6SCC277; 2003(2)LC1358(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1852

violative of Articles 14, 15 & 16 of the Constitution of India as also Section 5 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (for short the ER Act) and contrary to the mandatory directions issued by the Central Government under Section … to the age of 58 years is discrimination against them based on sex which is violative of Articles 14, 15 & 16 of the Constitution of India as also Section 5 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 08 1992

State of Madhya Pradesh and Another Vs. Pramod Bhartiya and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-1992

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 37 and 39; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1993SC286; [1992(65)FLR991]; JT1992(5)SC683; (1993)ILLJ490SC; 1993(I)OLR(SC)448; 1992(2)SCALE791; (1993)1SCC539; [1992]Supp1SCR904

the expressions 'same work or work of similar nature' contained in Clause (h) of Section 2 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The said Act was enacted by Parliament (as pointed out by this Court in Mackinnon Mackenzie v. Andrey … pay for equal work, it is self evident, is implicit in the doctrine of equality enshrined in Article 14, it flows from it. Because Clause (d) of Article 39 spoke of 'equal pay for equal work for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1986

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Audrey D'Costa of Bombay and Anr. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-1986

Subject : Service

Acts : Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 1(3) and 4(3); Equal Remuneration Ordinance, 1975; Companies Act

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR654; (1986)88BOMLR516

June 30, 1981. Thereafter on September 5, 1981 respondent No. 1 filed application for claim as contemplated by section 7 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 before the authority appointed under the Act. Respondent No. 1 1976 … the order dated May 31, 1982 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement). Appellate Authority under the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The facts giving rise to passing of this order are required to be briefly stated to appreciate the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1981

Air India Vs. Nergesh Meerza and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-1981

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 16, 16(2) and 19; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 4 and 16; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 45(2); Indian Airlines Corporation Regulations - Regulation 12

Reported in : AIR1981SC1829; 1981LabIC1313; (1981)IILLJ314SC; 1981(3)SCALE1275; (1981)4SCC335; [1982]1SCR438; 1981(2)SLJ349(SC)

Meerza and Ors. as 'petitioners'. (5) Declaration by the Central Government under Equal Remuneration Act as 'Declaration' and Equal Remuneration Act 1976 as '1976 Act'. (6) Air Corporation Act of 1953 as '1953 Act.'(7) Justice Khosla Award as 'Khosla Award' … history which laid to the formation of the two Corporations, viz., A.I. and I.A.C. 3. By virtue of Section 3 of the 1953 Act, the Central Government by a notification published in the official Gazette created two … S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. Transferred Case No. 3 of 1981 and the writ petitions filed by the petitioners raise common constitutional and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1997

irene Fernandes Vs. Neo Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR633

she was being paid only Rs. 700/- p.m.. The petitioner therefore filed claim under Section 7(1)(b) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 claiming payment at the same rate at which her male counterpart i.e. Vithal Shetty was paid.3. The Assistant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2006

K.V. Kamath Vs. Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Equal Remuneration Rules, 1976 - Rule 6; ;Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 10(1); ;Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 2; ;Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section 2

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN658,[2007(113)FLR853],(2007)ILLJ936Cal

the petitioner praying for quashing the proceeding being Case No. C-3006 of 2002 under Section 10(1)(a) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 read with Rule 6 of the Equal Remuneration Rules, 1976 and for setting aside the orders dated 04.06.2003

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2013

ing Vysa Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. State Represented by ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Apr-08-2013

Subject : Labour and Industrial

2009 filed by the respondent alleging that the petitioners have committed offence punishable under Section 10(1)(a) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 ('the Act' for short). The respondent is the Labour Enforcement Officer (Central). The complaint is sought to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2000

Vijaya Bank, M.G. Road, Bangalore and Another Vs. State by Labour Enfo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 200 and 204(2); Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 9 and 10(1)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4773; 2001(1)KarLJ457

ORDER1. This petition is directed against taking cognizance of an offence under Section 10(1) of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 in C.C. No. 115 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, II Court, Hassan.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial