Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: environment protection act 1986 section 13 · Page 1 of about 1,292 results (0.102 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 18 2004

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-2004

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 23; National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4 and 5; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 5, 5(3), 5(4) and 6(3); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Town and Country Planning Act; National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 4A, 22(4), 22(4A) and 22(5); Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Mineral Conservation and Dev

Reported in : AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

under notification dated 29th January, 1998 issued in exercise of power under Section 3(1) & (3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short, 'the EP Act') Mr. Bhure Lal was appointed its Chairman. The EPCA was constituted with a … enacted to provide for the development and regulation of mines and minerals under the control of the Union. Section 13 is the rule making power of the Central, Government. The Central Government is empowered to make rules to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

M/S. Sri Durga Glass Works, Firozabad Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 - Sections 2; 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 13; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 2; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 51-A and 252; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1997All179

Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 as well as Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.11. So in the light of this new philosophy to solve the human problems so as to sustain healthy … by item No. 2 of the Schedule. He further submitted that the petitioner should have filed appeal under Section 13 of the Act and non filing of appeal also disentitles the petitioner to the relief claimed. He has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2009

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2009

Subject : EnvironmentCommercial

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4A and 23; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18 and 35; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 13(2) and 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 6, 22(5) and 27(1); Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 - Rules 34 and 37; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 48A, 51A and 142

Reported in : JT2009(6)SC434; 2009(7)SCALE650; (2009)6SCC142; 2009(6)LC2626(SC)

It is important to note that by Notification dated 7.5.1992 issued by MoEF under Section 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 ('EP Act' for short), as amended, all new mining operations including renewal leases stood banned. The Notification further … suspended in the above Area.V. Net Effect of Orders passed by this Court earlier on 6.5.20022, 29/30.10.20023; 16.12.20024, 13.4.20065 and Judgment dated 18.3.20046 in M.C. Mehta's case: 12. One of the points argued on behalf of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2008

Vidarbha Flour Fills Owners' Association A Trade Union Registered unde ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Industrial Act; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Hazardous Wastes Management and Handling Rules, 1989; Air and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Less Act, 1977; Nagpur Municipal Corporation Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Development and Control Regulations, 2000 - Regulation 14.2

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR718; 2008(6)BomCR859

trade.21. For industries, party has to follow the rules comes under Industrial Act.22. Provision and rules under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Hazardous Wastes Management and Handling Rules, 1989 and the Air and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) … is the President of Vidarbha Flour Mills Owners Association, a registered trade union, registered under the provisions of Section 13 of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Petitioner No. 2 is running a flour mill in New Mangalwari area since

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2016

Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

19 - Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 - Section 38 - Cases Referred: 1. High Court on … It is in the light of this legal position, in paragraph 8 of the Judgment and Order dated 13th March 2015, while dealing with the provision of Section 234 of the said Act of 1949, this Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2002

Environsare Foundation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-30-2002

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(2); Coastal Region Zone Rules - Rule 5(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR519

imposing restrictions on industries, operations and processes in the C.R.Z. under section 3(1) and section 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and after considering the objections, in exercise of its powers under Rule 5(3)(d), it had issued the particular … July, 2002. The Division Bench passed the same order in the second writ petition being Writ Petition No. 1397 of 2002, which was filed in the meanwhile on 31st May, 2000. Both the petitions were directed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2006

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(2), 3(3) and 5; National Capital Region Planning Act, 1985; Air and Water Act

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT605(SC); 2006(10)SCALE246; (2006)10SCC490

done by the experts. We are of the view that the authority contemplated by Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 ('the Act') can be the only appropriate Authority to look into the environment protection side of the present … planned to develop the said area for construction of Hotels, Convention centers etc. Initially, by an order dated 13.9.1996 this Court directed inter alia as follows:The proposal of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) called International Hotels Complex

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

Prof.i.Elangovan Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Section 33, 32 to 41, 2(a)(k); Constitution of India - Article 253, 246(3) , 51, 247, 249, 250, 252; Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) - Section 617; B.N.A. Act - Section 92 (13); Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3(3)

v. Union of India, 1997 (2) SCC 87, a two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, being a Central Legislation, has overriding effect. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 has been enacted under Entry 13 … THE CHIEF JUSTICE 1. These petitions raise identical question of law and are concerned with the interpretation of Section 33 of the The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2008

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Through Chief S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-21-2008

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008MP142; 2008(2)MPHT490

dated 13th October, 1993, it was clarified that all the measures will be implemented under the provisions of Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Ministry reserved the right to take action including revoking the clearance under the provisions of the … the Omkareshwar Dam submitted by the Government of M.P. By letter dated 13th October, 1993, the Ministry of Environment and Forests accorded environmental clearance and … that on 6th July, 1968, the State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water dispute has arisen between the States

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2026

M/S.Srm Institute of Science and Technology, vs the Tamilnadu Pollutio ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-2026

pursuance of the complaint filed by the respondent under Section 200 Cr.P.C. read with Section 19(a) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, for the offences under Sections 15 and 16, ibid.2. The uncontroverted facts leading to the filing of this … made thefollowing submissions: i. When the petitioners had applied to the SEIAA for expansion of existing buildings on 13.04.2018 and had also got a Terms of Reference for the project proposal, in pursuance whereof, the petitioners had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial