Advanced Search Results

Delhi Pollution Control Committee versus Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.362

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Constitution of India; Environment (Protection) Act 1986. List of Keywords Restitutionary and compensatory damages; Bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure; Potential environmental damage; Violation of … Pollution) Act, 1981 on the ground that such an action amounts to imposition of penalty provided for in Chapters VII and VI of the respective Acts, and as such, procedure contemplated thereunder will be the only method … to 15 ] Constitution of India - Part IV A and Arts. 48A, 51A - Interpretation of and for Environmental Institutions - Discussed. [Paras 16-17]

Kakaral Ravikumar, Koppa and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. b ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 and rules, the Karnataka Industries [Facilitation] Act, 2002 and the Environment [Protection] Act, 1986, but also the constitutional provisions and placing and placing reliance on the Judgments indicated above has strongly urged … is available on record and therefore, submission to the contrary is rejected, extending the applicability of provisions of Chapter VII of the Act and this Notification also indicated that while the extent of 118 acres 6 guntas … (Prayer: These Writ Appeals filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to call for records and

Baldev Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC135

issued a notification dated 27.1.1994 in exercise of the powers vested in it under the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Rules framed thereunder for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects.37. The relevant extracts of the Ministry … follows:Therefore, M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited should have applied to the State Government for relaxation from observations contained in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. Since exemption from provision of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of the Development Plan of

In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(1)A, 19(10), 21, 25, 141 and 142; Noise Pollution Control and Regulation Rules, 1999; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Noise Abetment Act, 1960 - Sections 2; Control on Pollution Act, 1974; Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act, 1993; Noise Control Act, 1975; Noise Control (Miscellaneous Articles) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control (Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Accessories) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control Ordinance; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95, 268, 290 and 291; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 89 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;

Reported in : AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733

from traffic or aeroplane engines.'19. 'Pollution' is a noun derived from the verb 'pollute'. Section 2 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 defines 'environmental pollution' to mean the presence in the environment of any environmental pollutant. Section 2 of the … and Control, holds public meetings in selected cities to compile information on noise pollution.The Public Health And Welfare:- Chapter 65- Noise Control(US)68. The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an … occurs typically at high frequencies, usually with a maximum loss at around 4,000 Hz. It is now accepted that the risk of hearing loss is

Ajay Dubey, and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Minor Minerals Rules, 1996 - Rules 49, 2(22) 49(1), 45, 46 ; Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 ; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 15(1A), 18 ;

Mineral Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as '1996 Rules' ) which gives exemption from taking environmental clearance under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 for … and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 the Central Government has framed Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988. Chapter V of the said Rules deals with environment clearance which contains Rules 31 to 41. However, Rule 2(iv) … i.e. W.P. No.13329/2009, the validity of Sub-rule (1) and (2) of Rule 49 of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as '1996 Rules'

Shyam Bahadur Sakhya Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3, Sub-section (2), Clause (v); MMDR Act - Section 15; Environmental Protection Rules - Rule 5 (3)

in exercise of powers under sub-section 1 and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as Environment Act) read with clause (d) of sub-rule (3) of Rule 5 of the … 53 of the said judgment is also relevant, which reads as under:-53. Rule 31 to 41 contained in Chapter V of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 framed under Section 18 of MMRD Act deal with … Supreme Courts judgments dated 18.3.2004 and 8.5.2009 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985 (M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India and others) wherein it

The State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union Hasao District Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

declared by the Union to have taken under its control. Referring to EIA notification dated 14.09.2006 issued under Environment Protection Act, 1986, he submitted that environment clearance for mining was required only when area of mining was more than five … report of Comptroller and Auditor General of India for the period ending 31st March, 2013 under 7.5.18 of Chapter 7 of which the invoice value of the coal has been taken Rs. 4850/- per metric tonne. Thus, … KA Hima Nongstoin Land Owners, Coal Traders and Producers Association against the 4 order dated 10.05.2016 of the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.

Hanuman Laxman Aroskar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the HLWG. Paragraph 9 of the 2013 notification which has been issued under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 specifies the categories of new and expansion projects which are prohibited in the ESZ. The proposed airport 30 … cover specifically for a 10 kilometre radius from the airport site in Maharashtra is also set out in Chapter II of the EIA report, which indicates a reference to the forest area. Annexure IX of the EIA … and commercial/industrial and allied development near Mopa in the State of Goa”. 4 On 1 May 2000, the Government of India communicated its approval for

Sachu Rajan Eapen vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the NGT Act, 2010, the Tribunal exercising appellate jurisdiction cannot strike down rules or regulations made under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and therefore, relying upon the said proposition, it was contended that it would be fallacious to state that … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … BHAWAN, EAST ARJUN NAGAR, DELHI - 110032, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 4 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PLAMOODU JUNCTION, PATTAM PALACE P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

P.K.Biju @ Varghese P.K., vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the NGT Act, 2010, the Tribunal exercising appellate jurisdiction cannot strike down rules or regulations made under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and therefore, relying upon the said proposition, it was contended that it would be fallacious to state that … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … BHAWAN, EAST ARJUN NAGAR, DELHI - 110032, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 4 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PLAMOODU JUNCTION, PATTAM PALACE P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM