Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: entry tax act 1976 · Page 1 of about 11,080 results (0.194 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 05 2004

Geo Miller and Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2004

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958; ;Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 2(2), 3 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 366 and 366 (29A)

Reported in : AIR2004SC3552; 2004(5)SCALE747; (2004)5SCC209; [2004]136STC241(SC)

judgment affects the entire community of contractors.3. The questions that arise for consideration herein are:i) Whether the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, is unconstitutional as it is hit by Article 301 of the Constitution for not satisfying the conditions laid … goods used by the appellants are subject to Entry Tax by virtue of Section 3 of the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976?4. It is the submission of the appellants that the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976 is unconstitutional as it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

hereunder (at page 243 in 136 STC):3. The questions that arise for consideration herein are:(i) Whether the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, is unconstitutional as it is hit by Article 301 of the Constitution for not satisfying the conditions laid … goods used by the appellants are subject to entry tax by virtue of Section 3 of the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976?4. It is the submission of the appellants that the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976 is unconstitutional as it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2003

Bharati Telenet Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-2003

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 9, 10 and 12; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 226

Reported in : [2006]146STC243(MP)

for a declaration that the notification contained in annexure P-4 is violative of Section 3(2) of the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976 (for brevity 'the Act'). Quite apart from the above there are series of reliefs claimed in the writ … if eventually the notification is declared to be intra vires, to be assessed Under Section 3(2) of the Entry Tax Act, 1976 but the petitioner has been proceeded Under Section 3(1) of the Entry Tax Act which is not permissible

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 16 2018

National Highways Authority of India vs.ssangyong Engineering & Co ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the impugned award.13. Mr Potdukhe entered a Dissenting Note. He accepted that the Notification under the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 was a Subsequent Legislation. However, according to him, the extra cost incurred was not reimbursable. Mr Potdukhe agreed … barred by limitation; (ii) Ssangyong was not a dealer and, therefore, the Notification issued under the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 was not applicable to Ssangyong; and (iii) Ssangyong was not obliged to procure HSD from IOCL as its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2025

M/S United Spirits Ltd. versus the State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2025

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.11

effect the entry of goods into the local area as required u/s.3(1)(a) r/w ss.2(1)(aa), 2(1)(b) and 2(3), M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, rendering them liable for entry tax for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008; is there an inseverable link between … period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008; is there an inseverable link between the manufacturers and the ultimate retailers. Headnotes† M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976 - s.3(1)(a) r/w ss.2(1)(aa), 2(1)(b) and 2(3) - Incidence of taxation - “entry of goods into a local

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2006

Reliance Industries Ltd.-operator Vs. Assessing Authority and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-24-2006

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1, 226 and 227; Orissa Entertainment Tax Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 7(4); Orissa Entry Tax Rules, 1999 - Rule 10(2); Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6, 6(5), 6(6) and 7(7); Entry Tax Act

Reported in : 102(2006)CLT122; 2006(I)OLR802; [2006]148STC324(Orissa)

Orissa Entertainment Tax Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as 'the O.E.T. Act') and Rule 10(2) of the Orissa Entry Tax Rules, 1999 (hereinafter called 'the O.E.T. Rules') for the years 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively as well as the … of notification under Section 6(6) of the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 (hereinafter called 'the Maritime Zones Act'). The Assessing Authority without considering the stand taken by the petitioner has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2025

M/S Jsw Steel Limited versus Pratishtha Thakur Haritwal & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1200

demands under the relevant provisions of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Entry Tax Act, 1976 for the outstanding amount of Central Tax- Rs. 1,08,25,666/, State Tax- Rs. 2,66,42,094/-, and Entry Tax- Rs. 61,51,689/- … Courts Act, 1971; Constitution of India; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Entry Tax Act, 1976.List of Keywords Willful disobedience of judgment; Insolvency proceedings; Resolution Plans; Demand notices; Statutory dues of the central or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2008

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of C ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Apr-09-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2009)24VST348(NULL)

3(1) of the M.P. (C.G) Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 (for short, 'the Entry Tax Act') or not ?3. The facts, briefly stated, are that the petitioner(s), South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S. E.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1995

The Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-29-1995

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Men Maal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4A, 4A(1), 9, 9(1) and 12; Constitution of India - Article 14; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 1; Madhya Pradesh Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1882; Madhya Pradesh Upkar Adhiniyam, 1981; Entry Tax Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1996MP116

U.L. Bhat, C.J. 1. In some of these writ petitions, provisions of Entry Tax Act, 1976 (for short the Act) are challenged as unconstitutional. In all the writ petitions, except M. P. No. 1520

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1984

Gulabchand Harekchand and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 4, 5 and 8(3); ;Taxes on Entry of Goods into Calcutta Metropolitan Area Act, 1972; ;Central Excises Act, 1944; ;Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941 - Rule 3 and 3(28); ;West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1985(5)ECC235,1986(23)ELT306(Cal),[1985]59STC224(Cal)

under the Taxes of Entry on Goods into Calcutta Metropolitan Area Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Entry Tax Act).4. Mr. Gopal Chakraborty, the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, contends that 'gudaku' manufactured out of tobacco … and the said Entry Tax Act under a mistaken concept of law, such mistake was detected in September, 1976.16. Mr. Chakraborty also cites a decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case of B. Dar Laboratories

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial