Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: energy conservation act 2001 section 56 · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2007

Spencer'S Retail Ltd. Vs. Maharastra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Dec-19-2007

Subject : Electricity

not within the jurisdiction of the Commission.Enforcement of DSM measures for energy conservation is subject to regulation under Energy Conservation Act, 2001, by agencies so designated.55. In view of our above findings and observations, we allow the appeal and set … (FY) 2009-10 and Tariff for FY 2007-08. The proceedings for tariff determination were conducted by the Commission under Section 61 and Section 62 of the Electricity Act (for short to be referred to as the 'Act') and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2014

The Technological Institute of Textile and Science Bhiwani Vs. Financi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-23-2014

Subject : Education

job work basis to minimize working capital requirement, product mix was suitably changed, machines stoppages were controlled and energy conservation measures were taken etc.In the reply which is filed on behalf of the Union-respondent No.4, it was submitted … P-1) whereby, the Government has rejected the application of the petitioner under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short 'the Act') for permission to close the textile mill of the institute on the ground

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2005

State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2005

Subject : ConstitutionEnvironment

Acts : Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 2 and 4; ;Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1954 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(1A) and 5(2); ;Bombay Animal Preservation Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and 6; ;Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Extension and Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 4; ;Saurashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1956; Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1979; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to 19(6), 25, 25(1), 31C, 37, 39, 47, 48, 48A, 51A, 141 and 145(3); Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Ordinance, 1993; Bihar Preservation and Improvement of Animals Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955; ;Central Provinces and Berar Animal Preservation Act, 1949; Madhya Pradesh Krish

Reported in : AIR2006SC212; (2006)1GLR294; [2006(2)JCR272(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC580; RLW2006(1)SC705; 2005(8)SCALE661; (2005)8SCC534; 2006(1)LC240(SC)

to emphasise preservation and protection of agricultural animals like bulls and bullocks. With the growing adoption of non-conventional energy sources like bio-gas plants, even waste material have come to assume considerable value. After the cattle cease to … has recommended 23 steps to be taken by the State Government and the Central Government for development and conservation of food and fodder (See paras 37-41 of the report at pages 130-135).So far as the State of … 'agricultural and animal husbandry'. India is an agriculture based economy. According to 2001 census, 72.2% of the population still lives in villages (See- India Vision … reproduced by the Hon'ble Chief Justice on page 56 in his opinion onwards. Therefore, I need not … Lahoti, C.J. 1. Section 2 of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994 (Gujarat Act No. 4 of 1994) which introduced certain amendments in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 07 2024

Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited & Anr. versus Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.68

Issue for Consideration Whether, the Explanation(s) appended to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule 45 of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017 respectively are unreasonable … [Central Coalfields Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand, Civil Appeal No. 8395 of 2001 decided by three learned Judges on 24-9-2003. Ed. : Now reported at … the substantive merits of the policy itself. [Para 56] Interpretation of Statutes - Explanation(s) to r.38 of … or in breach of any statutory provision, it cannot be struck down - Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015. [Paras 50, 51, 61] Economic policies/laws relating to economic activities - Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, … as to harmonise with and clear up the ambiguity in the main section - An explanation does not either restrict or extend the enacting part;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 26 2004

Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation Vs. Epa

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-26-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

maximum degree of [pollutant] reduction … which the [state] permitting authority, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, determines is achievable for [the] facility.” §7479(3). Two provisions of the … Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA - 02-658 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2003 ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION V. EPA SUPREME COURT OF … Court of Appeals lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. In an order released March 27, 2001, the Ninth Circuit concluded that it had adjudicatory authority pursuant to 42 … plan. 48 Fed. Reg. 30626 (1983), as amended, 56 Fed. Reg. 19288 (1991); 40 CFR §52.96(a) (2002). … No. 02-658. Argued October 8, 2003-Decided January 21, 2004 The Clean Air Act’s (CAA or Act) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program, 42 U. S. … enforcement authority in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Section §113(a)(5) generally authorizes the EPA, when it finds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2010

Argentina Versus Uruguay

Court : International Court of Justice ICJ

Decided on : Apr-20-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Statute, pollution shall mean the direct or indirect introduction by man into the aquatic environment of substances or energy which have harmful effects.? The term œharmful effects? is defined in the CARU Digest as: œany alteration of … establishment by the parties of a œrégime for the use of the river? covering various subjects, including the conservation of living resources and the prevention of water pollution of the river. Articles 8 to 10 lay down … United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter the œBiodiversity Convention?), and the 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (hereinafter the œPOPs Convention?). It asserts … purpose of producing new documents pursuant to Article 56 of the Rules of Court. By letters of … the River Uruguay?, with reference in particular to œthe effects of such activities on the quality of the waters of the River Uruguay and on … CARU. These standards are to be found in Sections E3 and E4 of the CARU Digest. One

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2019

Hanuman Laxman Aroskar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

• • Drawing of traffic circulation plan for smooth circulation of Traffic in the area; • Minimum 20% energy conservation measures should be adopted in incorporating provisions for use of LED, star rated AC’s, and a revised energy … soon as a notification under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act 1927 is issued. Under the Forest Conservation Act 1980, any use of forest land for non-forest purposes requires prior permission of the Union Government, as elaborated … East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. EC was granted for the project in 2001. Pursuant to a letter by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to … Where experts are not available, professionals may be appointed to the EAC. 56 The EAC and the SEAC are charged with evaluating the information submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2019

Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi vs.schneider Electric India Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a dealer was entitled to deduct the turnover of sales made by him to any undertaking supplying electrical energy to the public in Delhi under a license or sanction granted or deemed license under the Indian Electricity … transfer of rights was framed under Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2001 Rules"). These Rules were framed in … 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to83 of the … in State of U.P. v Babu Ram AIR1961SC751 State of Tamil Nadu v Hind Stone AIR1981SC711and Chief Forest Conservator v Nissar Khan 2003 (4) SCC595 it was held that subordinate legislation that deals with a particular topic … of electricity in Delhi.3. During the relevant period the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 (“the DST Act”) provided for the levy of tax on sale … APPL.1/2017 & connected matters Page 3 of 52 Section 4(1) of the Act provides the rate at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2023

Cox And Kings Ltd. Vs. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2023

Subject : Arbitration

this Court before Chloro Controls (supra), rendered in Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd v. Jayesh H Pandya7 and Indowind Energy Ltd v. Wescare (I) Ltd,8 adopted a “rigid” and “restrictive” approach by placing undue emphasis on formal consent. … been succinctly summarized in an unpublished ICC award in case No.11405 of 2001 in the following terms: “[t].here is no general rule, in French international … Parties to Arbitration Agreement ....................................................................... 45 E. Group of Companies Doctrine ............................................................................. 56 i. Separate legal personality ................................................................................ 56 ii. Adopting a pragmatic approach to … form of negotiation or performance of the contract. iv. England 49. The English courts have generally taken a conservative approach to binding non-signatory parties to arbitration agreements. Section 82(2) of the English Arbitration Act 1996 defines a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2006

Randall Vs. Sorrell

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-2006

Subject : MRTP

expenditures was that “candidates were compelled to allow to fund raising increasing and extreme amounts of money and energy.” Buckley v. Valeo , 519 F. 2d 821, 838 (CADC 1975); see also Brief for United States et … Massachusetts Citizens for Life , Inc., 479 U. S. 238 , 259-260 (1986); Federal Election Comm’n v. National Conservative Political Action Comm. , 470 U. S. 480 , 491 (1985) (NCPAC); California Medical Assn. v. Federal Election … second circuit No. 04-1528. Argued February 28, 2006-Decided June 26, 2006 Vermont’s Act 64 stringently limits both the amounts that candidates for state office may … , N. Ornstein, T. Mann, & M. Malbin, Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002, pp. 89-98 (2002) (data showing that spending in competitive elections, i.e. , … and a reduction in fundraising time. In a section of the opinion dealing with FECA’s public financing … Democratic Party v. Jones , 530 U. S. 567 , 574. Although the Court upheld federal limits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial