Advanced Search Results

M.k. Ranjitsinh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is no single or umbrella legislation in India which relates to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 Energy Conservation Act 2001, Section 14(w). 17 | P age However, this does not mean that the people of India do not have … solar power as a source of renewable energy ........................................ 26 IV. Climate change litigation in other jurisdictions .......................................................... 31 D. The reasons for the modification of the judgement dated 19 April 2021 .......................... 34 2 | P

Sagar Sugars and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 15(4), 21(4) and 21(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Power Purchase Agreement - Article 9

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD419; 2004(2)ALT41

factory, the petitioner wanted to establish the power project with bagasse as fuel.3. The petitioner approached the Non-Conventional Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (for short hereinafter referred to as 'NEDCAP') with a proposal to set … to produce them separately. Thus by achieving higher efficiency, co-generation facilities can make a significant contribution to energy conservation.3. Objectives of the policy.3.1 As electricity and heat are fundamental inputs to most of the industrial activities the … ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1.The petitioner seeks a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in abruptly stopping the evacuation of … the power generated by the petitioner and the same is contrary to Section 15(4)(b) of the Reforms Act. Thirdly he contended that the 1st respondent

Neev Energy Llp vs Cochin Smart Mission Limited (Csml)

Court : Kerala

WORK TO THIS RESPONDENTExhibit R1(f) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.06.2023 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 14 OF THE ENERGY CONSERVATION ACT 2001 BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Exhibit R1(g) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.9.2021 IN WP(C) NO. 18203 … Authority [2023 (5) KHC 560]; Flemingo Travel Retail Limited v. Kannur International Air Port limited [2020 KHC Online 3118] and Flemingo Travel Retail Limited v. Kannur International Air port limited [2020(3) KHC 729], in support of his

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd and Or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mr. G.C. Bharuka, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Jasmeet Kaur & Mr. Kaushik, Advs. Versus SARDA ENERGY AND MINERALS LTD & ORS..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ratan Kr. Singh with Mr. J.K. Chaudhary, Mr. Vinod Chawla, … Act was granted on 06.10.1998. However, their request for grant of clearance under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 was kept pending for a long time and ultimately, the same was granted on 22.05.2003 by the … Section 79 of the Reorganization Act read with Adaptation of Laws Order, 2001. Consequently, it was not open to the State of Chhattisgarh to issue … to that effect was passed by the State of Madhya Pradesh on 31.12.1997. Another application of M/s Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. dated 22.05.1990 for prospecting

T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad (Through K.M. Chinnappa) Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 35(1)(4)(5); Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 24-B; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Section 349; Conservation Act - Section 3

Reported in : (2002)10SCC606

recognized “hotspots” for biodiversity conservation in the world. IA No. 670 of 2001 was filed by Shri K.M. Chinnappa describing himself as trustee, Wildlife First.2. … man-made environment and natural environment.18. Industrialisation, urbanisation, explosion of population, overexploitation of resources, depletion of traditional sources of energy and raw materials, and the search for new sources of energy and raw materials, the disruption of natural … Act, 1957 (in short “the Mines Act”), it was submitted that notwithstanding anything provided under the Act, the Conservation Act or the Environment Act, on an application being made the lease was to be renewed for twenty years … carried out was declared to be a national park in terms of Section 35(1) of the Act. The matter was referred to the Central Empowered

K.M. Chinnappa and T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 35(1), 35(4) and 35(5); Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 24B and 29; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 349; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 6, 7, 14, 21, 47, 48, 48A and 51A; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Forest Conservation Rules, 1981 - Rules 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003SC724; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)389; 2003(51)BLJR324; [2003(1)JCR105(SC)]; JT2002(9)SC200

environment man-made and natural environment. 19 Industrialisation, urbanisation, explosion of population, over-exploitationof resources, depletion of traditional sources of energy and rawmaterials, and the search for new sources of energy and raw materials, thedisruption of natural ecological balances, … (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (inshort the 'Mines Act'), it was submitted that notwithstanding anythingprovided under the Act, Conservation Act or the Environment Act, on anapplication being made the lease was to be renewed for twenty years andtherefore, … internationally recognized 'Hotspots' for bio-diversityconservation in the world. The I.A. 670 of 2001 was filed by Sri K.M.Chinnappa describing himself as trustee. Wildlife First. 2. … partof the tree. (See Kautilya III, XIX, 197) 31. As observed by this Court in Rural Litigation … was referred to the Central EmpoweredCommittee (in short 'the Committee') constituted under Section 3 of theEnvironment (Protection) Act, 1986 (in short the 'Environment Act'). Afterhearing

Gridco Limited, Orissa Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission N ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

to mines, pollution control monitoring equipment, development of ash brick storage yard, etc. to meet the requirement of Energy Conservation Act, 2001, the Environmental Action Plan and the obligations laid down by the Ministry of Environment and Pollution Control Board. … contained in the existing tariff notifications for individual power stations issued by the Central Government under proviso to Section 43 A(2) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 in respect of the existing stations of NTPC shall continue … time determined by the Central Commission for the period from 1.4.2000 to 31.3.2004 by Order dated 19.6.2002. Thereupon, the Respondent NTPC Limited filed the petition

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

the DVC Act provides that the corporation shall fix the schedule of charges for the supply of electrical energy, including their rates for bulk supply and retail distribution. It also requires the DVC to specify the manner … Utilities, wherein DVC is mandated to carryout certain functions such as flood control, irrigation, social integration project, soil conservation activities, multi-purpose dams, aforestation, etc. which normally are the functions of the States of Jharkhand and West Bengal.62. … While determining the tariff for such projects of NTPC, etc. under Regulations, 2001, the Central Commission provided special dispensation to these projects of NTPC in … my own with regard to the impact of the fourth proviso to Section 14 and effect of Sections 61, 62 and the relevant provisions of … account of Foreign Exchange Rate Variation up to 31.3.2004 already allowed by the Central Government/Commission. (iii) On

New York Vs. Ferc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AT OCTOBER TERM, 2001 Syllabus NEW YORK ET AL. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT … 16 U. S. C. § 2601 et seq., to promote the development of new generating facilities and to conserve the use of fossil fuels. Because the traditional utilities controlled the transmission lines and were reluctant to purchase … 00-568. Argued October 3, 200l-Decided March 4, 2002* When the Federal Power Act (FPA) became law in 1935, most electric utilities operated as separate, local … cost of its delivery; and there was little competition among utility companies. Section 201(b) of the FPA gave the Federal Power Commission (predecessor to respondent … & Regs., Regs. Preambles, Jan. 1991-June 1996, ~ 31,036, p. 31,632, 61 Fed. Reg. 21540 (1996). Order

Ms Saihavahana Ispat Limited. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act ; Mineral Concession Rules - Rule 26(1), 54; MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT - Section 30; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 14 Rule 2; Constitution of India. - Article 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; Right To Information Act

respondents No.5 to 11 therein and cause grave injustice to them, since enormous amount of time, money and energy spent by them in setting up the distilleries would be totally wasted.e) Also, in Netai Bag And Others … view of a statutory prohibition with regard to grant of mining lease under the provisions of the Forest. (Conservation) Act, 1980, it was only in the year 2003 that the lands in question were notified for grant of … failed to pursue the revision petition which was pending from 1993 till 2001 but it also did not take part in the proceedings after remand. … any revision petition as it was Rule 54 of the M.C.Rules r/w Section 30 of the M.M.R.D. Act. Further, W.P.No.5303/2006 was filed by one Sri … considered, the application filed by respondent No.3 dated 31/07/1980 was processed and Notification dated 27/02/2006 was issued