Advanced Search Results

Shamim Akhtar Vs. Iqbal Ahmad and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Evacuee Property Act, 1950; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Constitution of India - Article 226; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)612; 2000(7)SCALE197; (2000)8SCC123

the contention that the suit filed by the appellant was barred in view of Section 8 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968. Subsequently, respondent No. 1 sought an amendment of the written statement to introduce paragraph 29-A in which a … Mohalla Harsha, Varanasi. The appellant claiming to be the landlady of the said house filed a petition Under Section 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as

Raja Mohammad Amir Mohannad Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 6, 8, 13 and 18; Enemy Property Order, 1965; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR663; (2002)3BOMLR248; 2002(2)MhLj425

and preservation. Thereafter, in the year 1968 the Enemy Property Ordinance, 1968 was promulgated which was replaced by Enemy Property Act, 1968 (For short 'Enemy Property Act'). The properties belonging to late Raja which vested in the second respondent pursuant … deceased) continued to reside in India as Indian citizen. On 5-11-1962, the Defence of India Rules made under Section 3 of Defence of India Ordinance, 1962 came into force. The said Rules inter alia provided that with … the outset, pursuant to the order passed by us on 4th September, 2001 directing respondents to place on record copy of the note put up

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(3), 173, 372, 372(13), 372(14), 391, 392, 393 and 394; ;Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Section 6; ;Banking Regulation Act, 1949; ;Enemy Properties Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 7(3) and 8(1)

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

held by the Pakistani nationals now in Bangladesh. Mr. Mukherjee referred to the provisions of the Enemy Properties Act, 1968, Sections 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 20 and 22, and he submitted, if necessary, that the petitioner … on Bangladesh shareholders, Mr. Nag rightly submitted that notice on Custodian of Enemy Property was sufficient under the Enemy Property Act, Section 2(c), Section 7(3), Section 8(1) and Section 2(i). Thereafter, he dealt with the decision cited by the

Kausar Iram vs.government of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under W.P.(C) 2517 & 2518 of 2011 Page 1 of 10 Section 5, 5A and 24 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereafter „the Act‟).2. The issues involved in the present petitions are similar and, therefore, the present petitions were … impugned order‟) passed by the Custodian of Enemy Property (hereafter „the Custodian‟) under W.P.(C) 2517 & 2518 of 2011 Page 1 of 10 Section 5, 5A and 24 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereafter „the Act‟).2.

Rashida Khatoon & Ors vs.goverment of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under W.P.(C) 2517 & 2518 of 2011 Page 1 of 10 Section 5, 5A and 24 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereafter „the Act‟).2. The issues involved in the present petitions are similar and, therefore, the present petitions were … impugned order‟) passed by the Custodian of Enemy Property (hereafter „the Custodian‟) under W.P.(C) 2517 & 2518 of 2011 Page 1 of 10 Section 5, 5A and 24 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereafter „the Act‟).2.

Pradip Kumar Sarkar and ors. Vs. Luxmi Tea Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108, 155, 397, 398 and 399

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas491(Cal)

although his name may not be recorded in the register of members. 43. Under Section 5 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968, the enemy property vests in the Custodian of Enemy Property. It is, therefore, seen that the Custodian of … under Section 155 of the Companies Act were pending in respect of more than 3,000 shares constituting about 20% of the company's paid-up capital, purchased by some of the present plaintiffs and their supporters. 9. The present

Tanwir Eqbal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 5 and 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1989Cal139,(1989)1CALLT129(HC)

September, 1965 (copy enclosed) and continues to so vest in the said Custodian under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968'. (It is an admitted fact that Khadija Bi or Khadija Khatoon is one and the same person). The … that the said property as' vested in the custodian is without jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of Section 5, Enemy Property Act. It was further contended that Section 5 of the said Act states that notwithstanding … Bi sold this property to Gulam Rasul Qais in consideration of Rs. 20,000/- only. Undoubtedly this appearssomewhat strange that in the heart of the city

M/s. Jay Construction Co. Vs. The Custodian of the Enemy Property and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

continues to vest in it as per certificate dated 17th February, 2005 issued under section 12 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (for short âthe said Actâ?). The Petitioner was called upon to show cause as to how construction was … challenges the order passed by the Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, dated 16th May, 2014. 4. The Petitioner is also aggrieved and dissatisfied with the sealing of the immovable property under a notice

GyasuddIn Vs. Allah Tala Waqf Mausuma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145 and 146; Muslim Law; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133V(1); Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2); Citizenship Rules, 1956 - Rule 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 83

Reported in : AIR1986All39

other co-owners. This too, however, is beset with difficulty as will presently appear. 15. Section 5(1) of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (as amended by the Central Act XL of 1977), which came into force on September 27, 1977 relied … made also to the terms in which the mukhtarnama was executed by Srimati Umme Laila, which dated March 20, 1967, vide exhibit 5 and is claimed to have been brought into being in Pakistan. This also supports

Shamim Ahmad Vs. Rashida Begum and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 100; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 18 and 19; Defence of India Act, 1962; Defence of India Rules, 1962; Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act - Sections 13

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1316

20.2.1981. It was presented for registration on 20.5.1981. 18. The enemy and enemy property have been defined in Enemy Property Act. 1968. According toclause (b) of Section 2. enemy means a person or country who or which was enemy, an