Advanced Search Results

Shamim Ahmad Vs. Rashida Begum and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 100; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 18 and 19; Defence of India Act, 1962; Defence of India Rules, 1962; Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act - Sections 13

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1316

20.2.1981. It was presented for registration on 20.5.1981. 18. The enemy and enemy property have been defined in Enemy Property Act. 1968. According toclause (b) of Section 2. enemy means a person or country who or which was enemy, an … that the suit of the respondent No. 1 was not cognizable by civil court and is barred by Section 19 of Enemy Property Act. Section 19 reads as follows : '19. Protection of action taken under the Act.--No

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 48; Defence of India Ordinance, 1962; Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 22; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18 and 19; Defence of India (Amendment) Act, 1971; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 133V; Enemy Property Ordinance, 1968; Enemy Property (Custody and Registration) Order, 1962; Enemy Property (Custody and Registration) (Amendment) Order, 1965

Reported in : AIR2005SC4383; 2006(1)BomCR639; [2005(4)JCR206(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC25; 2005(8)SCALE523; (2005)8SCC696; 2006(1)LC44(SC)

of the properties in question were rejected. 5. Counsel for the parties have been heard at length. The Enemy Property Act, 1968 was enacted for purpose of continued vesting of enemy property, vested in the Custodian of Enemy Property for … property is not permanently vested in the Custodian and divesting the custodian of such property is contemplated. 8. Section 19 protects the action taken under the Act and provides that no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall

Liaq Ahmed and ors. Vs. Shri Habeeb-ur-rehman

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Enemy Properties Act, 1968 - Sections 18 and 19; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 2, 14(1), 15, and 26B

Reported in : AIR2000SC2470; 85(2000)DLT358(SC); JT2000(5)SC611; 2000(4)SCALE100; (2000)5SCC708

Reliance was placed on Section 18 of the Enemy Properties Act, 1968. It was further pleaded that under Section 19 of the said Act the Rent Controller had no jurisdiction. The appellants further submitted that the sale deed … distinction between the Evacuee Property Act under which the order dated 30th March, 1954 was passed and the Enemy Property Act, 1968 regarding which letter EkhibitP-1 dated 15th October, 1970 was issued intimating that the property, the subject matter of

The Swadeshi Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 8, 9, 13, 10, 17, 18 and 19; ;Defence of India Act, 1962 - Section 2 and 2C; ;Defence of India (Amendment) Act, 1971; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 116; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Defence of India Rules, 1962; ;Defence of India Rules, 1971

Reported in : AIR2007Cal53

enemy firm and the respondent authority became the custodian of the enemy property under the provision of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act of 1968') and continued to be in possession since then. The … enemy property is not permanently vested in the Custodian and divesting the Custodian of such property is contemplated.16. Section 19 protects the action taken under the Act and provides that no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall

Raja Mohammad Amir Mohannad Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 6, 8, 13 and 18; Enemy Property Order, 1965; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR663; (2002)3BOMLR248; 2002(2)MhLj425

and preservation. Thereafter, in the year 1968 the Enemy Property Ordinance, 1968 was promulgated which was replaced by Enemy Property Act, 1968 (For short 'Enemy Property Act'). The properties belonging to late Raja which vested in the second respondent pursuant … thereupon such property shall cease to vestin the Custodian and shall revest in such owner or other person.' Section 19 protects the action taken under the Act and provides that no `prosecution or other-legal proceeding shall lie against

Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammed Khan Vs. Metropole Hostels Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2010Utr7

2-Custodian of Enemy Property, was not maintainable in view of the bar created Under Section 19 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968. Also, in view of the fact that defendant No. 2 being a Government functionary and notice Under Section

Ismailbhai I. Kansara(d) Th. Lr Vs. State Of Gujarat, Through The Chie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

bar accompanying the written submission, in my view, would be of no avail to the petitioner and 2 Enemy Property Act, 1968 2 therefore, the Court need not detain itself elaborately on the aspect of regularization.3. In an intra Court … Still aggrieved, the appellant is before this Court.2. The appellant was served with a notice on 23.6.1992 under Section 19(2)(b) of the Displaced Person (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 19541. The appellant filed a writ petition in the High

M/s. Jay Construction Co. Vs. The Custodian of the Enemy Property and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

continues to vest in it as per certificate dated 17th February, 2005 issued under section 12 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (for short âthe said Actâ?). The Petitioner was called upon to show cause as to how construction was … The Petitioner is also aggrieved and dissatisfied with the sealing of the immovable property under a notice dated 19th May, 2014, issued by the Custodian of the Enemy Property (Respondent No. 1). 5. The Petitioner is a

Tanwir Eqbal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 5 and 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1989Cal139,(1989)1CALLT129(HC)

September, 1965 (copy enclosed) and continues to so vest in the said Custodian under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968'. (It is an admitted fact that Khadija Bi or Khadija Khatoon is one and the same person). The … that the said property as' vested in the custodian is without jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of Section 5, Enemy Property Act. It was further contended that Section 5 of the said Act states that notwithstanding … Hon'ble High Court. A writ petition with identical facts was moved in 1979 and thereafter the Trial Court's decision was challenged before the Division Bench

Smt. Dropadi Devi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 363 and 372; Delhi Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65 and 66 - Order 11, Rules 12 and 14 - Order 12, Rule 8 - Order 13, Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles XII(3), 166 and 365(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(29); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 6; Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1947; Perpetuities and Accumulation Act; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Indian Registration Act; defense of India Act, 1962; defense of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133; Enemy Property Act, 1968; Immovable Property Act, 1952; Requisitioning and Acquisition Act, 1952 - Sections 19 and 23

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi87

provisions of R. 133(v) of the defense of India Rules, 1962. With the revocation of the emergency, the Enemy Property Act, 1968 was enacted, whose object was to provide for continuing vesting of enemy property, which had already been vested … of compensation payable, and the authorities in whom that jurisdiction is vested, is provided by the 1952 Act. Section 19 expressly bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, including the High Court, to adjudicate in respect of any