Advanced Search Results

Raja Mohammad Amir Mohannad Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 6, 8, 13 and 18; Enemy Property Order, 1965; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR663; (2002)3BOMLR248; 2002(2)MhLj425

and preservation. Thereafter, in the year 1968 the Enemy Property Ordinance, 1968 was promulgated which was replaced by Enemy Property Act, 1968 (For short 'Enemy Property Act'). The properties belonging to late Raja which vested in the second respondent pursuant … fromattachment, seizure or sale in execution of decree of a Civil Court or orders of any other authority. Section 13 makes provision for validity of action taken in pursuance of orders of custodian and it reads thus -'13.

Smt. Dropadi Devi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 363 and 372; Delhi Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65 and 66 - Order 11, Rules 12 and 14 - Order 12, Rule 8 - Order 13, Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles XII(3), 166 and 365(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(29); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 6; Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1947; Perpetuities and Accumulation Act; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Indian Registration Act; defense of India Act, 1962; defense of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133; Enemy Property Act, 1968; Immovable Property Act, 1952; Requisitioning and Acquisition Act, 1952 - Sections 19 and 23

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi87

provisions of R. 133(v) of the defense of India Rules, 1962. With the revocation of the emergency, the Enemy Property Act, 1968 was enacted, whose object was to provide for continuing vesting of enemy property, which had already been vested … declared owners of suit property and entitled to exercise all rights of ownership in respect of same. - Section 13: [Altamas Kabir & Cyriac Joseph,JJ] Custody of child - Welfare of child vis--vis comity of Courts - The

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 48; Defence of India Ordinance, 1962; Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 22; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18 and 19; Defence of India (Amendment) Act, 1971; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 133V; Enemy Property Ordinance, 1968; Enemy Property (Custody and Registration) Order, 1962; Enemy Property (Custody and Registration) (Amendment) Order, 1965

Reported in : AIR2005SC4383; 2006(1)BomCR639; [2005(4)JCR206(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC25; 2005(8)SCALE523; (2005)8SCC696; 2006(1)LC44(SC)

of the properties in question were rejected. 5. Counsel for the parties have been heard at length. The Enemy Property Act, 1968 was enacted for purpose of continued vesting of enemy property, vested in the Custodian of Enemy Property for … attachment, seizure or sale in execution of decree of a civil court or orders of any other authority. Section 13 makes provision for validity of action taken in pursuance of orders of Custodian and reads as under:-'13. Validity

The Swadeshi Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 8, 9, 13, 10, 17, 18 and 19; ;Defence of India Act, 1962 - Section 2 and 2C; ;Defence of India (Amendment) Act, 1971; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 116; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Defence of India Rules, 1962; ;Defence of India Rules, 1971

Reported in : AIR2007Cal53

enemy firm and the respondent authority became the custodian of the enemy property under the provision of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act of 1968') and continued to be in possession since then. The … attachment, seizure or sale in execution of decree of a civil Court or orders of any other authority.14. Section 13 makes provision for validity of action taken in pursuance of orders of the Custodian and reads as under:13.

Shamim Ahmad Vs. Rashida Begum and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 100; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 18 and 19; Defence of India Act, 1962; Defence of India Rules, 1962; Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act - Sections 13

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1316

20.2.1981. It was presented for registration on 20.5.1981. 18. The enemy and enemy property have been defined in Enemy Property Act. 1968. According toclause (b) of Section 2. enemy means a person or country who or which was enemy, an … is Ram Singh and others v. Cram Panchayat Mehal Kalan and others : [1986]3SCR831 . In this case, Section 13 of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act was considered. It was observed that the plaint cannot be drawn

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(3), 173, 372, 372(13), 372(14), 391, 392, 393 and 394; ;Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Section 6; ;Banking Regulation Act, 1949; ;Enemy Properties Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 7(3) and 8(1)

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

held by the Pakistani nationals now in Bangladesh. Mr. Mukherjee referred to the provisions of the Enemy Properties Act, 1968, Sections 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 20 and 22, and he submitted, if necessary, that the petitioner … on Bangladesh shareholders, Mr. Nag rightly submitted that notice on Custodian of Enemy Property was sufficient under the Enemy Property Act, Section 2(c), Section 7(3), Section 8(1) and Section 2(i). Thereafter, he dealt with the decision cited by the

Zia--uddIn Vs. Abdul Majid and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21

Reported in : AIR1972Delhi251

not transgress any law which requires compliance. 9. I have gone through the concerned provisions contained in 'The Enemy Property Act, 1968', Section 9 where of is :- '9. Exemption of attachment etc. - All Enemy Property vested in the Custodian … - in view of legal position property of appellant cannot be attached - decree cannot be executed. - Section 13: [Altamas Kabir & Cyriac Joseph,JJ] Custody of child - Welfare of child vis--vis comity of Courts - The

M/s. Jay Construction Co. Vs. The Custodian of the Enemy Property and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

continues to vest in it as per certificate dated 17th February, 2005 issued under section 12 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (for short âthe said Actâ?). The Petitioner was called upon to show cause as to how construction was … 12. Then, validity of action taken in pursuance of orders of Custodian is an aspect dealt with by section 13. By sections 14, 15 and 16, the Act provides for proceedings against companies whose assets vest in Custodian,

Syed Jaweed Hussaini and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 9(3), 10 and 18; Enemy Property Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 3 and 8; Enemy Property (Amendment) Act, 1977; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Defence of India Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 300A; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133(1); Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1971

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD783

further explained the scope and ambit of both the Administration of Evacuee Property Act 1950 and also the Enemy Property Act, 1968.5. Sri Polisetti Radhakrishna, the learned Counsel representing the 5th respondent would submit that the stand of the 5th … affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The facts and events commencing from the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act dated 6-7-1967, Section 5A enquiry dated 24-10-1969 and Section 6 declaration dated … was issued under the powers given under the rules and particularly Rule 133(v) Sub-rule (1) of the Rules made under the Defence Act. According to

Lucknow Nagar Nigam Vs. Kohli Brothers Colour Lab Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

View of the Controversy:3. Whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” for the sake of convenience) amounts to expropriation which leads to the … he shall not be liable to any suit or other legal proceeding by reason only of such compliance.10.12 Section 13 deals with validity of action taken in pursuance of orders of Custodian while Section 14 deals with proceeding