Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: encroachment act · Page 1 of about 12,797 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 07 2002

Pre. Jothi Education Society Vs. Secretary, Major Irrigation, Governme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6 and 7; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 116

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD83; 2002(4)ALT417

is complained to this Court that the respondents issued a notice under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 on 18.4.2001 to the petitioner-Society calling upon it to show cause why they should not proceed under … calling upon it to show cause why they should not proceed under Section 6 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act 1905 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Encroachment Act'). It is also complained that, though no specific time was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2004

S. Lingamaiah Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act - Sections 6 and 7

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD837; 2004(3)ALT276

unauthorized occupation of Government land, a notice purported to be one under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short 'the Land Encroachment Act') was issued calling the petitioner to show-cause by 16-9-1993 as to … purported to be one under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short 'the Land Encroachment Act') was issued calling the petitioner to show-cause by 16-9-1993 as to why he should not be evicted from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2001

G. Kalavathi Vs. C. Anand Rau and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-19-2001

Subject : Property Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10 and 12; Land Grabbing Act - Sections 8; A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 2(1), 3(1), 5, 6 and 7; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 - Sections 13 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD2; 2001(2)ALT119; 2001CriLJ2253

dated 27-6-1971. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, issued a notice under Section 6 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905, dated 20-6-1986, bearing No.C/4360/1983, calling upon her lessee to vacate the land within three days from the … No.3/1, Ward-11, Block 'S', Shaikpet village, the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, initiated proceedings under A.P. Land Encroachment Act (for short the 'Act'). At the stage the petitioner questioned the said proceedings in Writ Petition No.11714 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 2012

S. Jayaraman and Another Vs. the Corporation of Madras, Rep.by Its Com ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 1992 is maintainable in view of the statutory bar contained under Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Encroachment Act 1905?" (extracted as such) 6. Heard both sides. 7. Mr.Raghavachari-the learned counsel for the appellant-Jayaraman (S.A.No.308 of 2006) … well as Mr.Sanjasy the learned counsel for Thiyagarajan would in unison submit that Section 14 of the Land Encroachment Act, which is extracted hereunder for ready reference "Sec.14. Bar of jurisdiction of Courts- Notwithstanding anything contained in any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2016

M. Raja Vs. The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Thirumayam Taluk and An ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-16-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

basis of the wrong classification, the Thasildar has issued notice dated 27.05.2016 under Section 5 of the Land Encroachment act, 1905 referring W.P.No.26722 of 2013 dated 08.10.2016 of this court and W.P.(MD).No.367 of 2016 dated 09.03.2016 of Madurai … has no jurisdiction to issue notice, after the enactment of Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 and his building has been in existence even prior to the year 1939. Hence, this Court by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2007

Addanki Adilakshmamma and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-21-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Shops and Establishments Act; Factories Act; Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 7 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 11 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 10 and 11- Order 10; Andhra Pradesh Board Standing Orders - Orders 15 and 21

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD398; 2007(3)ALT245

the suit is not maintainable. The Government is entitled to deal with the property as per the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and Section 14 thereof bars the jurisdiction of civil Court. The suit is, hence, not maintainable and … and as the defendants are trying to forcibly evict the plaintiff without following the procedure under the Land Encroachment Act, the suit was filed for declaration and injunction, which is not barred by Section 14 of the Land

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2026

Ravanammal vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-2026

the limits of Lake as per Section (6) of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 and after surveying the same handover the report to the 8th respondent as referred to in Section … 8th respondent as referred to in Section (6) (2) of Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 and on such handing over the chart and register publish notice in such manner prescribed or pointing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1994

Sri L. Syamababu Patro Vs. the Collector and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-09-1994

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Orissa State Urban Land Settlement Rules 1959 - Rule 17; Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act, 1954 - Sections 7(2); Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (Amendment) Act, 1972; Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (Amendment) Act, 1975; Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (Amendment) Act, 1976; Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (Amendment) Act, 1982; Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act, (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 78(1994)CLT414; 1994(I)OLR485

directing his appearance on 13-5-1971 and filing of show-cause under Section 7 of the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act, 1953 (Orissa Act 15 of 1954). Rule 17 of the U. L. S. Rules provides that if a … examine the case in the light of the provisions of Section 7 of the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act and fix up responsibility for slackness shown in the case. The reason, for the Government to direct examination

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1979

Rajkishore Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-23-1979

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 11, Rule 12

Reported in : AIR1979Ori96; 47(1979)CLT451

false plea was taken that the demolition was made under the provisions of the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act, but as a matter of fact no proceeding was started against the plaintiffs and in fact records were … statement of the State Government, it has been averred that Encroachment case under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act was filed against the plaintiffs and personal contact and proclamation through loudspeaker were made before actual eviction, proceedings

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2000

Sree Pancha Murthy Co-op. House Building Society Ltd. Vs. Govt. of A.P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-27-2000

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 - Sections 13; Madras Survey and Boundaries Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Encroachment Act - Sections 6 and 7; Land Regulation, 1358 Fasli - Sections 4

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD520

following the due process of law. 18. Admittedly, no proceedings were initiated under the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act or no suit was initiated. In such an event, the Government is estopped from claiming the title suo … such assignees out of 35 Sarfekhas assignees by name Mr. Jqffar Ali Shareefwhen the proceedings under the Land Encroachment Act were sought to be initiated against successors-in-title, the Division Bench of this Court in a common judgment in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial