Advanced Search Results
Mysore Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...
Mumbai
Feb-02-1966
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2) and 58K; Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Sections 17
[1966]61ITR572(Bom)
the manufacture and sale of year and cloth in Bangalore. The Company started two provident funds for its employees. In the year 1941 it started provident found for the benefit of the monthly-rated employees and this found
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRalliwolf Limited Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-i, for ...
Mumbai
Sep-15-2000
Service SICA
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 5, 6, 7-A, 11, 12, 14-B, 15(2) and 17(5); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 15(1), 16(2), 18 and 22(1); Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23, 39 and 41; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 9-A; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25, 32, 529A and 530; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Bombay Village Panchayats Act., 1959; UP Industrial Peace (Timely Payment of Wages) Act, 1978
(2001)1BOMLR235; [2001(88)FLR692]; (2001)ILLJ1423Bom; 2001(2)MhLj169
involved in the present proceedings is whether an action to recover dues payable under the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is maintainable when the employer who is sought to be proceeded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Nagpur Glass Works Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commission ...
Mumbai
Nov-26-1959
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3), 2(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 17 and 19A; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 83; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Provident Funds Act, 1925; Provident Funds Rules; Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 226 and 227; Charitable Trusts (Validation) Act, 1954
AIR1961Bom157; (1960)62BOMLR425; [1960(1)FLR63]; ILR1960Bom580
1956) praying for the quashing of the above said demand on the ground that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act of 1952 were not applicable to the industry of the petitioner. The Division Bench of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.R. Kulkarni and ors. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra, Nationalised Bank Cons ...
Mumbai
Feb-13-2004
ServiceLabour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 217 and 226; Bank of Maharashtra Officers Service Regulation, 1979 - Regulation 2, 3, 19 and 20(2); Maharashtra Employees' Provident Fund Rules - Rule 2; Bank of Maharashtra (Employees') Pension Regulations 1995 - Regulation 20(2), 22, 22(1), 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 31, 31(1), 32, 33 and 34(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 12(2) and 19; Bank of Maharashtra Employees' Pension Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 29(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 18(1); Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957; Central Civil Service Rules - Rule 26; Reserve Bank of India Staff Regulations, 1948 - Regulations 16, 26 and 26(3A); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bank of
2004(2)ALLMR612; 2004(5)BomCR743; (2004)IILLJ1007Bom
it to his notice, did not do so. In the other banks, where the scheme was introduced the employees of those banks had been given certain monetary benefits which have been denied to the petitioner and other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir India Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity A ...
Mumbai
Nov-10-1998
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(6), 7, 13 and 14; Payment of Gratuity (Maharashtra) Rules, 1972 - Rules 6 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 41 and 226; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 9; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 60; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 10 and 12; Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 - Rule 9(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630
1999(1)BomCR426; [1999(81)FLR900]
Controlling Authority though the issues involved were identical. Under the said orders, the respondents No. 3 to 26 employees were held eligible to recover the amount of their gratuity payable in accordance with the provisions of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSophia Shree Basant Kumar Memorial Polytechnic Vs. Regional Provident ...
Mumbai
Oct-17-2000
Labour and Industrial
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A, 14B and 148
2001(1)BomCR791; (2001)1BOMLR428; [2001(88)FLR924]; (2001)ILLJ985Bom; 2001(1)MhLj211
Fund Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner), whereby the Commissioner directed the petitioner-institution to refund to its employees the amount that was deducted by the petitioner from the wages payable to the employees on account of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRambhuwal Thakar Prasad Vs. Phoenix Mills
Mumbai
Mar-19-1974
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33A; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 73
(1976)ILLJ93Bom
Bench of the Madras High court that the employer had not properly discharged its obligation of examining the employees explanation was correct or not, by going through the facts on record and found that the certificate which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Bombay Vs. Bharat Barrel a ...
Mumbai
Sep-19-1966
InsuranceLabour and Industrial
Bombay Employees' Insurance Courts Rules, 1959 - Rules 13(3), 16, 17, 42(1) and 42(2); Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 75, 76 to 78, 78(2), 80, 96 and 96(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2, 80 and 129; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(10)
AIR1967Bom472; (1967)69BOMLR52; [1967(15)FLR369]; (1967)ILLJ625Bom; 1967MhLJ261; (2008)1SCC(L&S)558
Matched in: Parties The Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Bombay Vs. Bharat Barrel and Drum Manufacturing Co. Private Ltd. and Anr. (19.09.1966 - BOMHC)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskConsolidated Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd. Vs. V. Hema Chandra Rao
Mumbai
Feb-06-1976
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 12; Provident Fund Act - Sections 12
(1976)78BOMLR246; (1977)ILLJ114Bom
A very short question arises in this petition as to the correct meaning of S. 12 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (Act 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Provident
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.B. Khatavkar Vs. S. Taki Beligrami
Mumbai
Aug-07-1970
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 5, 10(1), 17, and 25H; Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Sections 5 and 17; Employees Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions act - Sections 2 and 2(10)
(1971)73BOMLR570; (1971)IILLJ445Bom; 1971MhLJ753
industry. In the second part, which may be called the inclusive part, of the definition are included contractor's employees and employees who are dismissed or discharged under certain circumstances. 3. It may be added that sub-clause (b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »