Advanced Search Results
Mysore Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...
Mumbai
Feb-02-1966
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2) and 58K; Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Sections 17
[1966]61ITR572(Bom)
the manufacture and sale of year and cloth in Bangalore. The Company started two provident funds for its employees. In the year 1941 it started provident found for the benefit of the monthly-rated employees and this found
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.R. Kulkarni and ors. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra, Nationalised Bank Cons ...
Mumbai
Feb-13-2004
ServiceLabour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 217 and 226; Bank of Maharashtra Officers Service Regulation, 1979 - Regulation 2, 3, 19 and 20(2); Maharashtra Employees' Provident Fund Rules - Rule 2; Bank of Maharashtra (Employees') Pension Regulations 1995 - Regulation 20(2), 22, 22(1), 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 31, 31(1), 32, 33 and 34(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 12(2) and 19; Bank of Maharashtra Employees' Pension Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 29(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 18(1); Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957; Central Civil Service Rules - Rule 26; Reserve Bank of India Staff Regulations, 1948 - Regulations 16, 26 and 26(3A); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bank of
2004(2)ALLMR612; 2004(5)BomCR743; (2004)IILLJ1007Bom
it to his notice, did not do so. In the other banks, where the scheme was introduced the employees of those banks had been given certain monetary benefits which have been denied to the petitioner and other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir India Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity A ...
Mumbai
Nov-10-1998
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(6), 7, 13 and 14; Payment of Gratuity (Maharashtra) Rules, 1972 - Rules 6 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 41 and 226; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 9; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 60; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 10 and 12; Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 - Rule 9(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630
1999(1)BomCR426; [1999(81)FLR900]
Controlling Authority though the issues involved were identical. Under the said orders, the respondents No. 3 to 26 employees were held eligible to recover the amount of their gratuity payable in accordance with the provisions of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rambhuwal Thakar Prasad Vs. Phoenix Mills
Mumbai
Mar-19-1974
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33A; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 73
(1976)ILLJ93Bom
Bench of the Madras High court that the employer had not properly discharged its obligation of examining the employees explanation was correct or not, by going through the facts on record and found that the certificate which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Bombay Vs. Bharat Barrel a ...
Mumbai
Sep-19-1966
InsuranceLabour and Industrial
Bombay Employees' Insurance Courts Rules, 1959 - Rules 13(3), 16, 17, 42(1) and 42(2); Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 75, 76 to 78, 78(2), 80, 96 and 96(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2, 80 and 129; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(10)
AIR1967Bom472; (1967)69BOMLR52; [1967(15)FLR369]; (1967)ILLJ625Bom; 1967MhLJ261; (2008)1SCC(L&S)558
Tarkunde, J.(1) This reference has been made under Section 81 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 by the Employees' Insurance Court, Bombay, for the decision of two questions of law.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.B. Khatavkar Vs. S. Taki Beligrami
Mumbai
Aug-07-1970
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 5, 10(1), 17, and 25H; Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Sections 5 and 17; Employees Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions act - Sections 2 and 2(10)
(1971)73BOMLR570; (1971)IILLJ445Bom; 1971MhLJ753
industry. In the second part, which may be called the inclusive part, of the definition are included contractor's employees and employees who are dismissed or discharged under certain circumstances. 3. It may be added that sub-clause (b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahalaxmi Shikshan Sanstha Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jan-08-1998
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9 and 16 ; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 36 and 37; Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(2)ALLMR35; 1998(3)BomCR796; 1998(1)MhLj826
the enquiry against the employee for his alleged omissions and commissions and misconduct in accordance with the Maharashtra Employees of Private School Rules. 1981 (for short, 'Rules of 1981'), and proceed against the employee accordingly. The management
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociated Electrical Agencies Vs. Commissioner for Workmen's Compensa ...
Mumbai
Aug-04-1994
Labour and Industrial
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8) and (14), 3, 38, 39, 46, 46(1), 51, 53, 61 and 96; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1928 - Sections 22(2) and 30
1994ACJ1078; 1995(2)BomCR82; (1994)96BOMLR39; [1995(70)FLR749]; (1995)ILLJ368Bom; 1995(1)MhLj379
Respondent No. 2, at the time of the incident, was 27 years old. 2. The Legislature enacted the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short 'the ESI Act') to provide for certain benefits to employees in case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchand Onkarlal Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
May-02-2006
Labour and Industrial
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), 1(5), 2(12) and 87; Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1976; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4 and 3; Employees' Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952; Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1989; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 26, 28, 37(3), 38(2), 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52(A), 56, 58, 59 and 61; Beedi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976; Maternity Benefits Act, 1961; Central Excises Act, 1944; Bidi and Cigar Workers (Regulation of Conditions of Service) Act; Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Maharashtra Workmen Minimum House Rent Allowance Act, 1983; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1941 - Sections 61; Payment of Wages
2006(5)BomCR884; (2006)IIILLJ441Bom; 2006(4)MhLj339
Relaiwala, who work in the business premises. The petition has been aimed to challenge application of provisions of Employees' State Insurance Act to the petitioner's factory, in particular, and generally to challenge the amended Section 2(12), i.e.,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRhone-poulenc Employees Union Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ...
Mumbai
Mar-15-1995
Labour and Industrial
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 - Sections 17 and 17(2)
1995(3)BomCR707; (1996)IILLJ1001Bom
interpretation of provisions of Section 17(2) of theEmployees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 read with the EmployeesProvident Funds Scheme, 1952. For the sake of convenience facts in Writ Petition No. 1910/1992, briefly, are being stated.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »