Advanced Search Results
Gopalbhai Chandubhai Rana Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jul-15-2008
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 135, 135(1), 135(1)(A) and 135(1)(C); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 99 to 101, 209, 313 and 374
2008CriLJ4023; (2008)3GLR2026
alias Suresh Amarsinh Gohil were charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 135(1) (A) and (C) of he Electricity Act, 2003 by the learned Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad which is at Exh.5 in Special Case (GEB) No. 59 … give false evidence against the accused persons. Merely because procedure under Chapter VII of the Criminal Procedure Code Section 99 to 101 is not followed by PW 4 Mr. Bhalsod, it cannot be said that the whole case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReliance Energy Limited Vs. the Maharashtra Electricity
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Apr-04-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)LCAPTEL164
18, 2006.4. The Commission in exercise of power vested in it under Sections 61 and 62 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and all other powers enabling it in this behalf and after taking into consideration of the submissions made … May 3, 2006 directed REL to submit its revised ARR and Tariff Petition for FY 2006-07 including separate section on truing up of ARR for FY 2005-06. REL submitted its revised ARR and Tariff Petition for FY … etc. REL has claimed the actual amount spent by it of Rs. 99.19 crores in this regard. However, Rs. 73.66 crores was allowed on truing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-08-2021
Land Acquisition
versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … 01.07.2010 and 31.03.2017 had crystallised and the dispute as to rate of LPS was raised to vex it 99 further. It is not denied that the appellant had not disputed any of the Monthly Bills or Supplementary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In the Matter Of: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd Vs. Madhya ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-06-2010
Land Acquisition
Commission) seeking for the approval and adoption of tariff for procurement of power under section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 from two bidders namely Reliance Power Limited and Essar Power Limited who had submitted offer for supply of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Mohit Paper Mills Ltd. and Another Pvvnl and Others
Allahabad
Oct-14-2011
Land Acquisition
but having further scope of privatization. Lastly we had a comprehensive single Parliamentary Legislation in the form of Electricity Act, 2003 (Hereinafter referred to as the Act, 2003). 7. Everybody is agreeable to one aspect that one of the … or under Act 2003. 53. Section 146 provides for punishment for non-compliance of orders or direction given under Act 2003. Section 147 declares that penalties under the Act 2003 shall be in addition to and not in derogation of … not be made but includes also the period lesser than twelve months. 99. The Assessing Officer, further, in making assessment cannot proceed in a mechanical
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
May-24-2013
Land Acquisition
of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … to pre-tax RoE of less than what was allowed to the wind energy generators in the impugned order. 99. In other words, the wind energy projects have been allowed Return on Equity more than that was allowed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Assistant Executive Engineer, Distribution/Rural, Tamil Nadu Elect ...
Chennai
Jun-24-2008
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39(1), 44(1) and 185; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 151, 153 and 154; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 135 to 139, 260(1), 262, 263 to 265, 307, 308 and 313
2009LC(MAD)782
revision petitioner has repeatedly contended that the first appellate Court has rendered its judgment on 30.12.2003 and the Electricity Act, 2003 has come into force on 10.06.2003 and therefore, on the date of pronouncement of the judgment by the … the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. Under the said circumstances, the accused is said to have committed offences under Sections 39(1) and 44(1)(aa) of the Electricity Act, 1910.3. On receipt of Ex.P1, the investigating agency has done investigation … case is to the judgment dated 30.12.2003 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2002 by the Additional Sessions cum Fast Track Court No. I,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Karnataka
Dec-20-2024
Service Tax
12 other cases Karnataka before the enactment of the Karnataka Electricity Regulations, 1999 (“the KER, 1999”) and the Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Electricity Act” or “the Act”).5. They had also entered into agreements with the Government of Karnataka which … financial autonomy to the Regulatory Commissions. The Act provides that the appropriate Government shall constitute a Fund under section 99 or Section 103 of the Act, as the case may be, to be called as Regulatory Commission Fund.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Station Manager, Wbseb (Now Wbsedcl) Burdwan and Others Vs. Sisir ...
West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Aug-16-2013
MRTP
new meter installed on 04.01.2007 . It was also submitted that in terms of provisions of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 read with the provisions of the West Bengal (Electricity Supply Code ) 2004 , a complaint against any … both parties and after perusal of documents / Case Laws and after taking into consideration the provision of Section 42 (5) of the Electricity Act 2003 , Ld. Forum below treated the complaint as a consumer complaint … 1999 illegally and unauthorizedly extended the contractual load of 45. HP to 99.5 HP and again , thereafter, to 131.90 HP for which the Complainants
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Rajasthan Steel Chambers C/O Savitri Concast Ltd, and Others Vs. ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-30-2012
Electricity
the Electricity Act for the Financial Year 2011-2012. In accordance with the provision of Section 64(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Electricity Board published the abridged form of its application inviting objections and comments from the stake holders.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »