Advanced Search Results

Dsr Steel (P) Ltd Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 125, 94(1)(f); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 100

the Commission, the appellants and a large number of other consumers in that category filed review petitions under Section 94 (1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking review and continuation of the incentive scheme. These review petitions were … 1. These appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 call in question the correctness of an order dated 23rd November, 2006, passed by the Appellate Tribunal for

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationElectricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

now deal with the submission of Mr. Fali S. Nariman that in view of Section 175 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is also available for arbitrating disputes between licensees and generating … This appeal is filed regarding the deduction of Rs. 5 crores. The appellant may file application under Section 94(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 before the appropriate Commission, to pass such an interim order, as may consider

M/S. Aarti Steels Limited, Odisha Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Co ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

coal and other consumables did increase. The ASL also filed an application under section 94(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking review of the provisional variable cost of 59 paisa. The Commission then directed the ASL to submit

M/S. Aarti Steels Limited, Odisha Vs. Odisha Electricity Regulatory Co ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

coal and other consumables did increase. The ASL also filed an application under section 94(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking review of the provisional variable cost of 59 paisa. The Commission then directed the ASL to submit

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(4), 3, 14, 16, 42, 42(5), 42(6), 45(5), 55(2), 57, 61, 62, 76, 76(1), 79, 79(1), 82, 83, 84, 85, 85(1), 86, 86(1), 86(2), 94, 96, 125, 126, 127, 128, 128(1), 128(5), 128(6), 129, 142, 143, 163 and 181; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and Ombudsman) Regulations, 2003

Reported in : AIR2008SC976; 2007(4)AWC3662(SC); 2008(1)BomCR738; JT2007(10)SC365; 2007(10)SCALE279; (2007)8SCC381; [2007] 9 SCR 9

Civil Appeal No. 2846 of 20061. This appeal under Section 125 of the of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by … Section 61 lays down the tariff regulations and Section 62 provides for determination of tariff. The Commission under Section 94 has civil powers also and under Section 96 it has power of entry and seizure. Under Section 126

Vrl Logistics Ltd Corporate Office Vs. Hubli Electricity Supply Compan ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

construction is unavoidable. (b) The powers of the State Commission under the Electricity Act, 2003 are enumerated in Section 94. Section 94 (f) states that the appropriate Commission shall have powers to review its directions and orders. Section … Jurisdiction and whether such an Order can be prevented from being challenged in Appeal u/s 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 before this Tribunal?? 1. These are the two questions posed before this Tribunal in this matter. 2. VRL

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … this issue is as follows: “By the impugned order, the banking charges are directed to be collected at 94 paise per unit banked and re-drawn for consumption. Earlier, banking charges were collected @ 5% of the units

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Viniyamak Bhavan, C-Block, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110 017 Sub: Directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003 regarding disruption in electricity supply to consumers and compensation payable in respect thereof. Sir, Considering the very large … Province, the Chief Commissioner acting within the scope of the authority given to him under sub-section (3) of section 94 of the said Act, and b) in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … functions of an Information Commissioner.58. A reference was, once again, made to the powers of the Commission under Section 94 to 96 of the said Act as also to Section 97, which provides for delegation of the power

Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Lanco Kondapalli Po ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Secitons 8, 9, 11, 11(3), 11(4), 14, 20, 29, 33, 94(2), 126, 127 and 145; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 - Sections 2, 14, 28, 37, 37(1) and 50; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(64), 82, 82(1), 86, 86(1), 158 and 174; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 185 and 185(3); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Partnership Act; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : 2006(1)ARBLR1(SC); JT2005(10)SC542; (2006)1SCC540; MANU/SC/2523/2005

terms of Section 37(1) of the 1998 Act corresponding to Section 86(1)(f) read with Section 174 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, '2003 Act'). However, in the meantime, as no arbitrator was appointed by the Appellant in terms … be subject to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996)'24. Sub-section (2) of Section 94 of the Act empowers the State Commission to pass an interim order in any proceeding before it. The