Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 93 · Page 1 of about 864 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 2005

Twenty First Century Wire Rods Limited Vs. the Administrator and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 49 and 79; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 121 and 122 to 185; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227; Tariff Regulations

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR408; 2006(1)BomCR539; (2005)107BOMLR1220

dt.22.9.03 and 2.3.04 are both illegal and unlawful as the notification dt.2.4.93 lapsed on the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, having brought into force on 10.6.03. The learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn my attention to the … computed on the basis of method prescribed under notification issued on 2.4.93 in exercise of power conferred under Section 49 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948. On 19.9.03 the Writ Petition preferred in respect of Unit No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2014

Vijay Nath Mishra @ Vijendra Nath Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and Ot ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

For quashing of the F.I.R., bearing Alamganj P.S. Case No. 315 of 2012, registered under Section-135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground of being not maintainable as the same has been … law including the Act with reference to the provisions contained in Sections 41 to 60, 70 to 81, 93 to 105 and 165 Cr.P.C. The Division Bench in the case of Ram Chandra Pansari also did not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2023

M/S.Vodafone Idea Ltd. (Formerly Known as Idea Cellular Ltd.) vs Keral ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-19-2023

be set aside.5. Sri.Nandagopal Kurup, on the other hand, argued that in view of Section 93 of the Electricity Act, 2003, no act or proceedings of an Appropriate Commission shall be questioned or invalidated merely on the ground of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2013

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-24-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … cost has been fixed correctly by the State Commission. Accordingly, this issue is decided as against the Appellants. 93. The Fourth Issue is regarding Return on Equity. 94. According to the learned counsel for the Appellants, Return

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2008

Small Hydro Power Developers' Vs. Transmission Corporation Of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-08-2008

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2011

Ptc India Limited, New Delhi and Another Vs. Uttrakhand Electricity Re ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-11-2011

Subject : MRTP

on the clarification given by the State Government, Respondent herein, without considering the scheme and provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the various Regulations framed thereunder. ii) The Electricity Act, 2003 envisages trading in electricity for ensuring efficient … Pvt. Ltd. on 66 kV network. The State Commission by the impugned order has held that as per Section 42 of the Electricity Act and its Regulations on open access in Distribution, open access is permissible only … MR. RAKESH NATH, TEHNICAL MEMBER 1. Appeal Nos. 88 and 93 of 2010 have been filed by PTC India Limited and Bhilangana Hydro

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2011

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … power and functions of the Tribunal is concerned, is very clear and have been laid down in para 93 and 94 of the judgment. Therefore, we cannot legitimately do exercise which is not mandated in Section 111

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission of … of votes, the Chairperson would have a casting vote. W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 68 of 152 93. Speaking about the powers of the SEBI, the Supreme Court, in Clariant International Ltd. and Anr. vs. Securities

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2011

Tamilnadu State Electricity Board, Chennai Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Mar-17-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Commission dismissed the same. There upon, the Appellant requested the Government to issue policy directives u/s 108 of Electricity Act, 2003. Accordingly, on 11.04.2007, the State Government issued the policy directives to the State Commission to the effect that … Commission has fixed the purchase price of Wind Mill without being conscious of the fact that as per Section 61 of the Electricity Act, the appropriate Commission must safeguard the interest of the consumers, while fixing the … well as with the ratio of this Tribunal’s Judgement in Appeal no. 93 of 2009 relied upon by the Appellant. Hence, the view of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2022

The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission Vs. Maharashtra Electricit ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2022

Subject : Electricity

2003. The tariff for intra-State Transmission System can be decided under Section 62 or Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 63 provides for adoption of the tariff determined through transparent process of bidding. Clause 5.3 of the Tariff … any, are disposed of. ……....….....…….....………………........CJI. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]. ...….........….....….......………………........J.[AS Bopanna]. …….........….....….......………………........J.[J.B. Pardiwala]. New Delhi; November 23, 2022 93

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial