Advanced Search Results

The Tata Power Company Limited, Rep. by B.J. Shroff Vs. Maharashtra El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Maharashtra swore an affidavit on 11.06.2010 to the effect that the Government did not exercise its power under section 11 or section 37 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and that the Memoranda dated 7.05.2010 and 19.05.2010 are … MERC, to kindly issue further instructions to SLDC Kalwa for scheduling power as per the provisions in the Electricity Act,2003” 5. In this situation the appellant filed a writ application on 19.05.2010 before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court … others -Vs State of Maharashtra and others reported in (2009) 9 SCC 92. 18. Since the appellant challenged the letter dated 16.05.2010 and 18.05.2010 before

In the Matter of : Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Vs. Rajasthan Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

these sections have anything similar or analogous to the provisions of sub section 92) of section 56 of Electricity Act 2003. Section 455 of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act provides for a method of recovery of certain dues. The Corporation

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission a ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the appellant. In the first place, the Commission has drawn our attention to section 92 of the Electricity Act 2003. Section 92 deals with proceedings of appropriate commissions. The Section 92(3) deals with the manner in which decisions have to

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. National thermal Power Corporation Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulation Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 3(1), 13, 14(1), 14A, 14A(7), 14(2), 28, 37, 51, 55 and 79; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 43A(2); Electricity Act, 2003; Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 114 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 47, Rule 1; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 92, 93, 94, 103 and 110 to 117; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms & Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2001 - Regulations 1.4, 2.4 and 2.7; ; ;

Reported in : 2009LC(SC)13; JT2009(3)SC462; 2009(3)SCALE620; (2009)6SCC235; 2009(2)LC966(SC); 2009AIRSCW5869; [2009] 3 SCR 1060

Authority, Regulatory Commission and establishment of Appellate Tribunal and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, enacted the Electricity Act, 2003. It came into force with effect from 10th June, 2003.12. On or about 25th September, 1999 the Government … the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short the Central Commission) was established in terms of Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the 1998 Act. Indisputably the powers and functions of the Commission are extensive being contained in … 1999 Regulations').Chapter V of the 1999 Regulations deals with tariff regulations. Regulations 92, 93, 94 read as under:92. The Commission on its own on being

The Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity ...

Court : Kerala

under this Act. WP(C) NO. 19205 OF 2023 : 11 : performance of its statutory functions under the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 1258 provides that any person aggrieved by any decision of the APTEL may file an appeal to the … under sub-section (2) of section 91;(zl) rules of procedure for transaction of business under sub-section (1) of section 92;(zm) minimum information to be maintained by a licensee or the generating company and the manner of such information

National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

namely, PTC India Ltd. vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission [(2010) 4 SCC603 under pari materia provisions under the Electricity Act, 2003, and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India & Ors. [(2014) 3 SCC222 under the … various earlier decisions of this Court, which had held that an Advocate General granting or refusing sanction under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code was an administrative decision, just as granting or withholding sanction to file a

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL1108

1. The Appellant M/s Tata Steel Ltd. has preferred the present appeal under Section 111 of The Electricity Act, 2003 seeking for the following reliefs: (i) To call for the records and direct the Respondents not to Insist … conclusion of the member of the commission and by virtue of casting vote conferred under Sub-section (3) of Section 92, on the petition filed by the Appellant herein, held thus: Keeping the above in view the following issues

Central Coalfields Ltd Jharkhand Vs. Dlf Power Ltd Haryana

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … capital cost comprises land cost, wind generator cost, cost of the evacuation facilities and infrastructure development cost, etc. 92. The State Commission has taken into consideration the same and fixed the capital cost. The Appellants have not

Monnet Power Company Limted vs.union of India & Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

on fixed charges / capacity charges under the regime of electricity tariffs specifically under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 which provides for determination of tariff by a bidding process; (2) The decision to put a cap on