Advanced Search Results

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

notified the Competitive Bidding Guidelines 3 (hereinafter referred to as “the Bidding Guidelines”) under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “the Electricity Act”). The objective of the said Bidding Guidelines is for introduction of

Sidhi Smelters Private Limited Rep. by Its Executive Director Bijay Ku ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 26, 49 and 79; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 24, 47, 50, 88, 181 and 181(3); Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004 - Regulation 5(5); Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Electricity Rules - Rule 27

Reported in : AIR2008Mad78

in order to consolidate the laws relating to electricity generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity, the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) has been enacted to replace the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, the Electricity … above preamble. It is further submitted that the commission had duly consulted the State advisory committee constituted under Section 88 of the said Act and the Commission had made previous publication of the draft Electricity Supply Code as

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : The Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 15, 19, 42, 49, 53, 56, 59, 62, 62(1), 64, 64(6), 82, 86, 131(2) and 172; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24 and 24(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 85 and 85(1); Electricity Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 78, 84 and 88; Factories Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Reorganization Act; Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Guj164; (2005)1GLR519

with retrospective effect.3. Mr. G.N. Shah, learned counsel for some of the petitioners advanced the following arguments:3.1 The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. … 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. Section 172(d) of the said Act authorizes a State Government to declare that the said Act shall not apply … amendment is approved by the Commission and published as provided under Regulation 88 of the Regulations.'8.2 In the case of M.S.E. Board v. M/s Madhusudandas,

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

tabulated below: Central Law under List Addition and not in Overriding over other III Derogation provision Inconsistent laws Electricity Act, 2003 (List Sec. 175 Sec.174 III, Entry38) Limited Liability Act, 2008 Sec. 71 -- (List III, Entry7) The Commercial … the provisions of any other law for the time being in force.” 85 PART F13Section 83 corresponds to Section 88 of the RERA. However, there is no provision in WB-HIRA corresponding to Section 89 of RERA, according to

Ptc India Limited, New Delhi and Another Vs. Uttrakhand Electricity Re ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

on the clarification given by the State Government, Respondent herein, without considering the scheme and provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the various Regulations framed thereunder. ii) The Electricity Act, 2003 envisages trading in electricity for ensuring efficient … Pvt. Ltd. on 66 kV network. The State Commission by the impugned order has held that as per Section 42 of the Electricity Act and its Regulations on open access in Distribution, open access is permissible only … MR. RAKESH NATH, TEHNICAL MEMBER 1. Appeal Nos. 88 and 93 of 2010 have been filed by PTC India Limited and

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … as notified by SBI each year gets incorporated in the Power Purchasing Agreements, as binding between the parties. 88 Thus, any other system notified by the Reserve Bank of India by its circulars has no bearing on

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission of … to electronic records and electronic signatures; (i) section 85-C - presumption as to digital signature certificates; (j) section 88-A - presumption as to electronic messages; (k) section 89 - presumption as to due execution etc., of documents

Kanan Devan Hill Plantations Company Pvt. Ltd. Munnar and Others Vs. K ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

respect of each of the appellants. It is contended as follows:- a) As per the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 , the Commission has to decide the price of power to be purchased by the distribution licensees either … Bulk Supply Tariff is not included under Section 62 of the Act carries no force because under the Act, 2003, Section 2(70) ‘supply’ in relation to electricity means the sale of electricity to a consumer as also to a … appellant is Rs.4.04. It is clearly brought out on record that about 88% of the total sales of energy is made by this appellant to

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member. 1. This is an Appeal preferred under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 9.05.2013 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the Central Commission) in … Central Commission has partly allowed the Review Petition and, therefore, as per judgment dated 2.12.2013 in Appeal No. 88 of 2013, NTPC v/s Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, this Tribunal has held that the doctrine of merger is

Municipal Corporation of Greater Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

impugned MERC order dated November 6, 2007 passed, inter-alia, under the provisions of Section 86(1) (f) of The Electricity Act, 2003 (The Act in short). The appellant has challenged the validity and legality of that part of the impugned … for further hearing on July 31, 2007. In the meantime the MERC shall decide petition nos. 87 and 88 of 2006 within a period of four months. We have no manner of doubt that in case the