Advanced Search Results

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : The Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 15, 19, 42, 49, 53, 56, 59, 62, 62(1), 64, 64(6), 82, 86, 131(2) and 172; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24 and 24(1); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22, 29, 29(2), 29(3), 85 and 85(1); Electricity Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 78, 84 and 88; Factories Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Reorganization Act; Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Guj164; (2005)1GLR519

Commission Act,1998 read with section 86 of Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 78 of the Regulation framed by the Commission.4.1 He submitted that as held … with retrospective effect.3. Mr. G.N. Shah, learned counsel for some of the petitioners advanced the following arguments:3.1 The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. … 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was brought into force by Central Government Notification dated 10th June 2003. Section 172(d) of the said Act authorizes a State Government to declare that the said Act shall not apply

A.V. Amarnathan S/O Late T.K. Karunakaran Vs. Sri. H.D. Kumaraswamy, C ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Karnataka Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Sections 2C, 14, 15 and 95; Electricity Act, 2003; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 2 and 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 78(2) and 81; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2313

the Statutory provision. Commission has the necessary power, so vested in the Civil Court in terms of CPC. Electricity Act 2003 came into force with effect from 10.6.2003 under the Central Act. The State Electricity Regulatory Commission is constituted … Thereafter, the complainant submitted . an application before the Advocate General seeking for a permission to proceed Under Section 15 of the Act. The same was rejected. With these facts, the complainant is before us for initiation … A newspaper is not one of the documents referred to in Section 78(2) of the Evidence Act, 1872 by which an allegation of fact can

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 11, 11(1), 12, 12(3), 15(4), 26, 26(5), 54(2), 56(2) and 56(3); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 29; Transfer Scheme Rules

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

Matched in: Citation AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

the Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … statute. It issued directions which were binding upon the Board having regard to the provisions contained in Section 78-A of the 1948 Act. The Board was bound thereby. The Board, having regard to its financial constraints, could

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … statute. It issued directions which were binding upon the Board having regard to the provisions contained in Section 78-A of the 1948 Act. The Board was bound thereby. The Board, having regard to its financial constraints, could

M/S. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited, (U.P.) Vs. Haryana Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute under Section 86 (1) (b) and Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 between Generating Company, the Appellant and the Distribution Licensee, Haryana Power (R-2) over a Power Purchase Agreement dated … deal with the issue as well as the relevant facts for giving such a finding by the Commission. 78. This case relates to the dispute between the Haryana Power and PTC, the Lanco Power with reference to

Anil Soni Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Commission by the Central Government is envisaged to be on the recommendations of a Selection Committee as per Section 78 of The Electricity Act, 2003, which reads as under:“78. Constitution of Selection Committee to recommend Members.(1) The Central … PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Interpretation of sub-Section 2 of Section 77 of The Electricity Act, 2003, falls for consideration in the two captioned petitions. Two additional issues, the first pertaining to Dr.R.K.Pachauri, alleged to

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … ground, this Court set aside the second appellate decision which had been brought before it by the appellants. 78 In R. Ramachandran Ayyar v. Ramalingam Chettiar [(1963) 3 SCR604: AIR1963SC302 , this Court had occasion to revert

Shri Nand Kishore Garg and anr. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 108, 61, 62

regard to the issues relating to finalization of the tariff by the Commission under the provisions of The Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity the 2003 Act), the illegality committed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi in … the Section 108 of the 2003 Act is almost similar to Section 78A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (for short the 1948 Act) and … State Government could have passed the order in the manner it has done in exercise of power under Section 108 of the 2003 Act.3. In this regard, we think it apposite to reproduce the relevant submissions advanced