Advanced Search Results

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 37, 42, 43, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5) and 75; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 12; States Reorganisation Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 32; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 131; Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962; General Clauses Act - Sections 14; Imports and Exports Control Act

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC629; 2006(9)SCALE194; (2006)10SCC736

Board and in particular in ignoring the provisions contained in the proviso appended to Section 131 of the Electricity Act, 2003.(iv) Apportionment of assets and liabilities pursuant to fixation of cut-off date as 15.11.2000 had caused serious prejudice to … generation, transmission and supply of electric power in both the successor States safeguards should also be provided Under Section 75 of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganization Act.21. Yet again the Chief Secretary of the Government of Madhya Pradesh by

Simran Wind Project Private Limited and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electric ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

being arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires the powers of the TNERC and contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the applicable CERC regulations.) 1. The writ petitions have been filed to declare that the Tamil Nadu … gap between the conventional energy price and renewable energy price is bridged. The Tariff Policy, 2006 and the section 86 (1) of the act enabled the appropriate commissions to fix the minimum purchase of electricity from renewable … energy Purchase Obligation Regulations, 2010 on 16.10.2010 by fixing a cap at 75% of the preferential tariff fixed by the commission on the purchases from

A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368

O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

Rules, 1956 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.(d) Whether till regulations are framed under Section 55 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the authority, the distribution company has authority to determine what would be a correct meter.27. The aforesaid … 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (Central Act 54 of 1948) to the extent this Act

M/S. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited, (U.P.) Vs. Haryana Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute under Section 86 (1) (b) and Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 between Generating Company, the Appellant and the Distribution Licensee, Haryana Power (R-2) over a Power Purchase Agreement dated … the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity in Appeal No.200 of 2009 dated 23rd February, 2011 (i) (2008) 4 SCC 755, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Versus Essar Power Limited 8. The Learned Senior Counsel for the R-2 has

A.P. Gas Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Regulatory Commission and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 11(1), 12, 13, 14, 14(4), 15, 16, 21(4) and 56(3); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(6), 5 to 18, 18A, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1926; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 to 19 and 28; Electricity Rules, 1956; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Duty) Act, 1952; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Consumption and Use) Order, 1977; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2004SC3090; JT2004(3)SC600; 2004(3)SCALE616; (2004)10SCC511

1926 - Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 - 19, 28 - Electricity Rules, 1956 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2 - State Government of Andhra Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh Electricity Board entering into Memorandum of

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … are using their energy for captive use as well as for 3rd party sale and the distribution licensees. 75. The Relevant articles of the agreement entered between M/s. Beta Wind Farm (P) Ltd. (the Appellant) and TANGEDCO

West Central Railway, General Manager Office Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electr ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

in complete disregard to the principles for determination of tariff enumerated in Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Further Railway tariff should be less than other EHT consumers as explained earlier, hence to be kept as … load factor of Railways on an average remains 35%. This Appellant Tribunal in its judgment in Appeal No. 75/2011 has mentioned that the effective tariff is calculated at 35% load factor and, on this load factor, the

The Tata Power Company Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 17, 22, 22(1), 29, 73, 111 and 127; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 46, 57, 57A and 57B; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 110; Electricity Act, 1910; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR867

not open for the MERC to invite the advice of the CEA under Section 73 (n) of the Electricity Act, 2003 on the requirement of standby facility to be availed by TPC and REL as on 31st January, 1998.According

East Coast Railway Through Chief Electrical Distribution Engineer Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

issued by Ministry of Power, Government of India in 1991 is binding on the State Commissions constituted under Electricity Act, 2003. Also whether the Appellant is entitled for concessional tariff by virtue of it being a public utility? 18. … due regard to the important public function of transportation carried out by it. v) That in terms of Section 61(g) of the Electricity Act, the appropriate commission shall be guided by the objective that tariff progressively reflects … in the Judgment of this Honble Tribunal dated 23-5-2012 in Appeal No. 75 of 2011 in Union of India through Southern Railway Vs TNERC and