Advanced Search Results

Molay Kumar Acharya Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, W.B. State Ele ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(39) and 43; ;Poor Relief (Ireland) Act, 1838 - Sections 71 and 124; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144(2)

Reported in : AIR2008Cal47,2008(3)CHN27

filed the aforementioned Suit for the eviction of her brother, i.e. the petitioner.12. Under Section 43 of the Electricity Act 2003, the 'Licensee' defined under Section 2(39) of the Act, has the duty to supply electricity on an Application … photocopy whereof was submitted by Mr. Bidyut Banerjee himself and which reads as follows:(21) 'Person in actual occupation-' Section 71, 'Occupier', Section 124, Poor Relief (Ireland) Act, 1838)(1 & 2 Vict. c. 56), see Middleton v. M'Donnell (1896)

The Tata Power Company Limited, Rep. by B.J. Shroff Vs. Maharashtra El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Maharashtra swore an affidavit on 11.06.2010 to the effect that the Government did not exercise its power under section 11 or section 37 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and that the Memoranda dated 7.05.2010 and 19.05.2010 are … MERC, to kindly issue further instructions to SLDC Kalwa for scheduling power as per the provisions in the Electricity Act,2003” 5. In this situation the appellant filed a writ application on 19.05.2010 before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court … application on 19.05.2010 before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (writ petition no. 71 of 2011 ) challenging the Memorandum dated 7.05.2010 issued by the Government

Ptc India Ltd. Vs Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation .

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Himachal Pradesh to be developed by the respondent. The respondent is a generating company as defined in the Electricity Act, 2003.4. The appellant company has been granted license to trade in electricity by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred … Electricity in its judgment dated 21st October, 2008, passed in Appeal No. 71/2008, has specifically noted that CERC does not have the power to determine … PTC India Limited v. Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as JKHCL) dismissing its petition under Section 9 (ii) (d) and (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an interim stay against the termination

Global Energy Ltd. and anr. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(71), 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(5), 16, 17, 18, 19, 29(1), 29(2), 52, 66, 76, 76(1), 178, 178(1) and 178(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 356(2); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 22A; Rajasthan Amendment Act, 1976; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 74(1), 146(2), 226, 245 and 246; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters) (Amendment), Regulation, 2006 - Regulation 6A; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters), Regulation, 2004 - Regula

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW5121; AIR2009SC3194; 2009LC(SC)227; JT2009(11)SC164; 2009(8)SCALE108; 2009(5)LC2521(SC); (2009) 15 SCC 570

as 'Amended Regulation') is the question involved herein.BACKGROUND FACTS3. It arises in the following factual matrix.The Parliament enacted Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the said Act'). In exercise of its jurisdiction conferred by Section 178 of the

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

tabulated below: Central Law under List Addition and not in Overriding over other III Derogation provision Inconsistent laws Electricity Act, 2003 (List Sec. 175 Sec.174 III, Entry38) Limited Liability Act, 2008 Sec. 71 -- (List III, Entry7) The Commercial … 70: Provides for There is no such provision. Compounding of compounding of offences under Offences the Act. 8 Section 71(1): provides that Section 40(3): Factors Factors for Regulatory Authority shall stated in WB-HIRA for adjudging quantum appoint an

National Hydroelectric Power Vs. H.P. State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL730

of the Electricity Act, 2003. The learned Counsel appearing for the contesting Respondent while placing reliance on Regulation 71, pointed out that the Appellant may be directed to go before the Regulatory Commission for relaxation or to … Ltd., an undertaking of the Government of India, has preferred the present appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking to set aside (i) the Order dated 20^th July, 2005 passed by the first Respondent Himachal Pradesh

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … coal, made by the generator which were disputed by the distribution licensee on the ground that the bid 71 submitted by the generator itself was premised on imported coal. Since the principal claim was disputed by the

Small Hydro Power Developers' Vs. Transmission Corporation Of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … are (a) West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission V/s Calcutta Electricity Supply Company Ltd. Reported in (2002) 8 SCC 715, (b) K.S Venkataraman and Co. Pvt.Ltd. V/s State of Madras reported in AIR 1966 SC 1089 ,(c )

M/S. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited, (U.P.) Vs. Haryana Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute under Section 86 (1) (b) and Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 between Generating Company, the Appellant and the Distribution Licensee, Haryana Power (R-2) over a Power Purchase Agreement dated … relating to the trading licensees only when the trading license has been granted by the said State Commission. 71. On the strength of this contention, it is contended by the Appellant that it does not have the