Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: electricity act 2003 section 68 · Page 1 of about 1,502 results (0.083 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 2012

Shri Sathya Sai Warehousing and Logistics Park (Sss ) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-26-2012

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003. - Sections 68, 164, 185(2)(b); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(1)(2), 18; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 12, 16; Constitution of India - Article 226, 21

it is not in dispute. Admittedly, no rules have been framed in terms of Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 185(2)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 which deals with Repeal and Saving provides that the provisions contained in … executing the power evacuation line works for the NCTPS Stage-II and MTPS Stage-III projects as provided for, under Section 68 and 164 of The Electricity Act, 2003."7. For the purpose of laying the electric line or electrical transmission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2012

A.Subramani Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 174; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 68 ; Motor Vehicles Act - Section 163-A

of coconut leaves and, therefore, liability is on the owner to pay compensation.THE STATUTE:10. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 contains provisions relating to overhead lines. The said provision reads thus:68. Overhead lines.- (1) An overhead line shall,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2007

Ajay Munjal Memorial Trust and ors. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-07-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 51, 67, 67(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 176(2) and 185; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 51; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 15; Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar34; 2007(2)BLJR1798; [2007(3)JCR254(Jhr)]

418 Kilo meters, involving a total cost of about Rs. 342 Crores was also approved on 14.1.2004 under Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. On 31.1.2004, 18.10.2004 and 12.9.2006, petitioner No. 2 purchased lands in question on … over their land 4. Respondent No. 1 is a Central Government Company and is a Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Licensee for short). The Licensee is required to establish transmission system and to undertake transmission of electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 29 2012

Alamelu Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

not due to improper maintenance. It was due to heavy rain and wind.STATUTORY FRAMEWORK:10. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 contains provisions relating to overhead lines. The said provision reads thus: 68. Overhead lines.- (1) An overhead line

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2012

The Chairman, Tantransco, Chennai Vs. the District Collector, Thiruval ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-22-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

approved the scheme through G.O.Ms.No.102, Energy Department, dated 10.12.2009 as provided under Sections 68 and 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner is exercising the power, which the Telegraph Authority possess under the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 under … No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Constitution of India - Article 226 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 68 & Section 164 - Section 17 - Indian Telegraph Act -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2011

D.P. Venkateshappa Vs. the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, Su ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Though it is contended by the learned Counsel for the respondents that as per Section 68(5) of the Electricity Act,2003, it is the Executive Magistrate or the Authority Specified by the Appropriate Government who has the power to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2014

The Executive Engineer KPTCL, Major and Another Vs. Doddakka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the compensation and also for assessing the value of the trees cut and removed. Even as per The Electricity Act, 2003, Section 68 provides for removal of shrubs, trees and other such growth if they are likely to affect overhead power … (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 – Section 10 - Land Acquisition Act - The Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 68 – Compensation for use of land – Respondent’s land was used by petitioners to draw high tension circuit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2009

Calendula Realtors Private Limited Vs. Cesc Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(20), 2(22), 2(40), 2(61), 2(72), 39(1), 51, 67, 68, 68(3), 68(5), 69, 164 and 173 to 175; ;Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 16(1) and 17; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 51; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Section 3(1); ;West Bengal Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3 and 3(4)

requirements of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the rules made there under.J) In terms of Section 68 of the 2003 Act, the State Government, through its Power Department, vide letter dated October 30, 2006 granted … Companies Act, 1956 and a licensee engaged in the business of distribution and generation of electricity, under the Electricity Act, 2003; And, whereas CESC is required to establish distribution system and to undertake supply of electricity through its distribution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2011

P.Nachimuthu and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 180, 68(1), 183, 176(2)(e); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6 to 12; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003: 27.Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2006

Jayantkumar Bhagubhai Patel and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-03-2006

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 67, 67(2), 68 and 164; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 28, 28(1) and 511; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regulation) Act, 2003; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19; Electricity (Supply) Act - Sections 28; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1725

Section 19 deals with 'compensation for damage'.The learned advocate for respondent No. 2 submitted that in new Act (Electricity Act, 2003) Section 164 provides for 'exercise of power of telegraphic authority in certain cases'. The learned advocate submitted that Section … for the petitioners submitted that the activity carried on by respondent No. 2 falls within the ambit of Section 68 of the Act. wherein it is provided:Provisions relating to overhead lines, such overhead lines can be laid down

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial