Advanced Search Results

Ptc India Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 60, 66, 111, 121, 125, 127 and 142

Reported in : 2009(5)SCALE411

Delhi (hereinafter referred to as to the `Tribunal'). The appeal has been filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act').2. The primary stand of the appellant is that though the Tribunal accepted that Electricity … the `Regulatory Commission') did not have any power to determine tariff for trading, it invoked Sections 60 and 66 of the Act to direct all Regulatory Commissions to fix trading margins as if it involved tariff determination.

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 60, 66, 111, 121, 125, 127 and 142

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW3987; 2009LC(SC)496; 2009(5)SCALE489; 2009(4)LC1738(SC)

Delhi (hereinafter referred to as to the `Tribunal'). The appeal has been filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act').2. The primary stand of the appellant is that though the Tribunal accepted that Electricity … the `Regulatory Commission') did not have any power to determine tariff for trading, it invoked Sections 60 and 66 of the Act to direct all Regulatory Commissions to fix trading margins as if it involved tariff determination.

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Gajendra Haldea and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 52, 60, 62, 66, 79(1), 86(1), 111, 111(1), 121, 127, 142 and 178; Central Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 9; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for grant of Trading License and other related matters) Regulations, 2004; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Fixation of Trading Margin) Regulations, 2006 - Regulation 2

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW7294; 2008LC(SC)511; [2008(4)JCR10(SC)]; 2008(11)SCALE313; 2008(2)LC1095(SC)

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short the `CERC') purportedly under Section 52 read with Section 79(1)(g) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the `Act') on 28.2.2006. The prayers inter- alia were under: (a) Direct GRIDCO to adhere to … on 26.3.2006 and the judgment was reserved. In said matters larger question of design of electricity market under Section 66 of the Act and role of regulators under Sections 60, 62, 79(1)(j) and 178 thereof were involved.9. It

DakshIn Haryana Bijli Vitran Vs. Dlf Services Ltd., Dlf Universal

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL764

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

being not by any artificial means or through the tampered meter, the assessment under Section 126(6) of the Electricity Act 2003 (for short, ‘the Act 2003’) could only be called to twice the fixed charges payable and such consumer … bidding process), Section 64 (Procedure for tariff order), Section 65 (Provision of subsidy by the State Government) and Section 66 (Development of market). In terms of Section 61, the Appropriate 30 Commission is entrusted, subject to the provisions

The Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity ...

Court : Kerala

under this Act. WP(C) NO. 19205 OF 2023 : 11 : performance of its statutory functions under the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 1258 provides that any person aggrieved by any decision of the APTEL may file an appeal to the … and Extra High Tension (EHT) category consumers of Kerala State Electricity Board Limited (KSEBL) availing supply at 11KV, 66 KV, 110 KV and 220 KV. The 1st respondent Regulatory Commission is constituted under Section 82(1)3 of the

In the Matter Of: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Gujarat Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member: 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter called 'The Act) against the Order dated 31.12.2012 passed by the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called … to nearest substation of GETCO. Further, Power Producer shall ensure the injection of power at not lower than 66 KV level. Power Producer shall also install RTUs to enable SLDC to monitor the injection of power. (vi)

M/S. Srinivasa Builders vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Kerala

PIN-685 553. 3 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER 66 KV SUB STATION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 553. 4 THE STATE OF KERALA … not goods as per the definition of 'goods' provided in Section 2(xx) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'the KVAT Act'). It is submitted that though the petitioner had obtained registration under the KVAT … was on clear error of fact and law, a rectification application was filed before the 1 strespondent under Section 66 of the Act as Ext.P21. The petitioner produced Ext.P15 letter of the KSEB with photographs of the windmill,

Ptc India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Thr. Its ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 14(1), 14A(7), 14(2), 18(5), 26(1), 27 and 77; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 60, 61, 62, 66, 79, 79(1), 79(3), 111, 121, 178, 178(2) and 179; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 108; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Fixation of Trading Margin) Regulations, 2006

Reported in : 2009(2)LHSC1037; 2009AIRSCW2946; 2009LC(SC)489; JT2009(3)SC564; 2009(3)SCALE845; (2009)5SCC466; 2009(3)LC1543(SC)

(supra) has no application to the present case. The Regulations have been framed under Section 178 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short `2003 Act'). It is pointed out that there is conceptual difference between the provisions which have … regulations' and later relates to 'determination' of tariff.3. Therefore, there is no question of dealing with trading margin. Section 66 deals with the issue of development of market including trading. Section 79 deals with functioning of CERC. Section

Global Energy Ltd. and anr. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(71), 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(5), 16, 17, 18, 19, 29(1), 29(2), 52, 66, 76, 76(1), 178, 178(1) and 178(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 356(2); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 22A; Rajasthan Amendment Act, 1976; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 74(1), 146(2), 226, 245 and 246; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters) (Amendment), Regulation, 2006 - Regulation 6A; Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Trading License and other related matters), Regulation, 2004 - Regula

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW5121; AIR2009SC3194; 2009LC(SC)227; JT2009(11)SC164; 2009(8)SCALE108; 2009(5)LC2521(SC); (2009) 15 SCC 570

as 'Amended Regulation') is the question involved herein.BACKGROUND FACTS3. It arises in the following factual matrix.The Parliament enacted Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the said Act'). In exercise of its jurisdiction conferred by Section 178 of the … that the Commission may specify the technical requirement, capital adequacy requirement and creditworthiness for being an electricity trader. Section 66 mandates that the Appropriate Commission shall endeavour to promote the development of a market (including trading) in power