Advanced Search Results

Ajay Munjal Memorial Trust and ors. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 51, 67, 67(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 176(2) and 185; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 51; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 15; Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar34; 2007(2)BLJR1798; [2007(3)JCR254(Jhr)]

over their land 4. Respondent No. 1 is a Central Government Company and is a Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Licensee for short). The Licensee is required to establish transmission system and to undertake transmission of electricity … lay down or place electric supply lines with consent of the owner or the occupier of the land. Section 51 of this Act provided inter alia that notwithstanding anything contained in Sections 12, the Central Government for inter-State

G.V.S. Rama Krishna and ors. Vs. A.P. Transco Rep. by Its Managing Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 57(2), 67 to 69, 164, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 19, 37, 51 and 53; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 28, 29, 29(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 69(1) and 69(2); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2009AP158; 2009(3)ALT502; 2009LC(AP)517

whereon any electric supply line or work has not already been lawfully laid down by such licensee. Under Section 51 of the Electricity Act, 1910, it was permissible for the Government to confer upon any public officer, Transmission … lines through the lands of the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.3. It is pleaded by the petitioners that originally a 400 KV line under Vijayawada Power Transmission Scheme was

Ashley Alteams India Limited. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

consent by the competent authority. Petitioner satisfies the definition of owner as defined under Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and "consumer's premises" as per Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Therefore, petitioner is

Hinduja Foundries Limited. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

the building and structure, he will fall within the definition of owner as per Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Relevant portion of the decision in paras

Ms.A.R.S. Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Bo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

7.06.2012 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as being contradictory to the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004 and Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004.COMMON ORDERWrit Petition No.15238 of … Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 as the area served by a service connection and the word premises defined under Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 as any land, building or structure . Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil

Chemplast Sanmar Limited. Vs. the Chairman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2(51); Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 - Regulation 2(l); Constitution of India - Articles 226

the building and structure, he will fall within the definition of owner as per Section 2(51) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 2(l) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. Relevant portion of the decision in paras

S.A. Hakim Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Transmission Licensee in the capacity of State Transmission Utility as envisaged under Sections 39 and 40 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short '2003 Act'). Under Section 164 of the 2003 Act, the appropriate Government (the State Government herein) … which the Telegraph Authority possesses under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. Section 164 of 2003 Act corresponds to Section 51 of 1910 Act and the same is saved by Section 185(2)(a) of 2003 Act. Therefore, the power conferred

Calendula Realtors Private Limited Vs. Cesc Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(20), 2(22), 2(40), 2(61), 2(72), 39(1), 51, 67, 68, 68(3), 68(5), 69, 164 and 173 to 175; ;Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 16(1) and 17; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 51; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Section 3(1); ;West Bengal Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3 and 3(4)

Companies Act, 1956 and a licensee engaged in the business of distribution and generation of electricity, under the Electricity Act, 2003; And, whereas CESC is required to establish distribution system and to undertake supply of electricity through its distribution … person on whom the powers under the Telegraph Act have been conferred by the State Government acting under Section 51 of the Electricity Act is resisted or obstructed, that authority has no alternative but to approach the District

Shri Padmakar Balkrishna Samant Meghdoot and Others Vs. Maharashtra St ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

for short) arrayed as respondent No.1 on the ground that it contradicts Sections 41 and 51 of The Electricity Act, 2003. The appellant also seeks certain directions on the respondent No.2, a distribution licensee in the area falling within … appellants, this income arose out of ‘other business’ and income from such business has to be governed by Section 51 of the Electricity Act, 2003 requiring accounts to be maintained separately for the distribution business as well as

Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi vs.schneider Electric India Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

upto 11.03.2004 upto which the DISCOMs enjoyed being licensees under Electricity Act 1910 but not thereafter when the Electricity Act, 2003 was brought into force. The tribunal further held that the assesses were not entitled to claim deduction for … may be. Further, Section 3 to 11, 28, 36(ii), 49A, 50 and 51 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 became inapplicable in the National Territory … tax on sale and purchase of goods in Delhi. ST. APPL.1/2017 & connected matters Page 3 of 52 Section 4(1) of the Act provides the rate at which sales tax was levied on the ―taxable turnover‖ of